{"id":204135,"date":"2018-10-24T11:27:51","date_gmt":"2018-10-24T05:57:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=204135"},"modified":"2018-10-25T13:34:29","modified_gmt":"2018-10-25T08:04:29","slug":"challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/","title":{"rendered":"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna<\/strong> High Court:<\/strong> A Single judge bench comprising of Birendra Kumar, J. while hearing a civil writ petition against an Arbitrator\u2019s order held that since the statutory remedy provided under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 had not been exhausted, the High Court could not exercise its writ jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

The respondent had acquired petitioner\u2019s land for construction of \u2018Dedicated Freight Corridor Project\u2019 under the Railways Act, 1989. The dispute involved was regarding the nature of acquired land \u2013 while the petitioner claimed it to a residential-cum-commercial land, the respondent treated it as agricultural land while deciding the payable compensation. Petitioner challenged the said order of the respondent authority before an Arbitrator under Section 20-F (6) of the Railways Act; but his claim was rejected by the Arbitral Tribunal. Aggrieved by the said order, petitioner preferred the present petition before the Hon\u2019ble High Court praying for a direction to the respondent authority to treat the acquired land as a commercial land and to quash the Arbitrator\u2019s order.<\/p>\n

The High Court noted that Section 20-F (7) of the Railways Act provides that the provisions of the Arbitration Act would be applicable in respect of all arbitration proceedings instituted under the Railways Act. Further, Section 34 of Arbitration Act provides a detailed provision to challenge an Arbitrator\u2019s award before Court. In view of a statutory remedy being available to the petitioner, the Court refused to exercise its writ jurisdiction. Further, it was also observed that the question as to whether the nature of acquired land was commercial or agricultural, would be a question of fact requiring an appreciation of evidence; and the said exercise lay outside the jurisdiction of a writ court.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the petition was disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. [Dilip Kumar v Union of India,2018 SCC OnLine Pat 1906<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Birendra Kumar, J. while hearing a civil writ petition against an Arbitrator\u2019s order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32198,32146,32199,7272],"class_list":["post-204135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitrators-award","tag-section-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-statutory-remedy","tag-writ-jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"\nChallenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Birendra Kumar, J. while hearing a civil writ petition against an Arbitrator\u2019s order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-24T05:57:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-25T08:04:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/\",\"name\":\"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-24T05:57:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-25T08:04:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted","og_description":"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Birendra Kumar, J. while hearing a civil writ petition against an Arbitrator\u2019s order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-24T05:57:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-25T08:04:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/","name":"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-24T05:57:51+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-25T08:04:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/challenge-to-arbitrators-award-in-a-writ-court-not-maintainable-if-statutory-remedy-under-section-34-of-arbitration-act-not-exhausted\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Challenge to Arbitrator\u2019s award in a writ court not maintainable if statutory remedy under Section 34 of A&C Act not exhausted"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":210968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/p-fair-compensation-to-be-determined-for-all-landowners\/","url_meta":{"origin":204135,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC | S. 28-A of Land Acquisition Act not an adversarial form of adjudication; fair compensation to be determined for all landowners","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This writ petition was filed before the Bench of G.S. Sandhawalia, J., against the award passed by the Arbitrator under the Railway (Amendment) Act, 2008, whereby the market value had been fixed for the land acquired for the Dedicated Freight Corridor Project. The dispute was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":292783,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/22\/calcutta-high-court-dismissed-writ-petition-ground-of-maintainability-scc-blog-legal-reseach-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":204135,"position":1},"title":"Supplier can refer to MSME Facilitation Council for adjudication despite post-contract MSME registration: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe MSMED Act of 2006 is a special statute as it was specifically enacted for facilitating the promotion and development of micro, small and medium Enterprises and enhancing their competitiveness.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/20\/writ-petition-not-maintainable-due-to-having-an-alternative-and-efficacious-remedy-under-s-17-of-the-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":204135,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable due to having an alternative and efficacious remedy under S. 17 of the SARFAESI Act","author":"Editor","date":"May 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. dismissed the writ petition in view of availability of alternative remedy to the petitioners under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act.\u00a0 The instant writ petition was filed by the borrowers for quashing the order dated 15-03-2022 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":272666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/31\/arbitration-arbitral-award-can-execution-be-by-writ-of-mandamus-alternate-remedy-section-34-legal-news-legal-updates-supreme-court-legal-research-high-court-jurisdiction-scope\/","url_meta":{"origin":204135,"position":3},"title":"If a High Court converts itself into Executing Court it will be flooded with writ petitions to execute arbitral awards: SC","author":"Editor","date":"August 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While adjudicating an appeal relating to arbitration, the Division Bench of M. R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., held that by entertaining the petition under Article 226 for executing an arbitral award, the High Court had virtually converted itself into Executing Court. Modifying the impugned judgment and order,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/If-a-High-Court-converts-itself-into-Executing-Court-it-will-be-flooded-with-the-writ-petitions-to-execute-arbitral-awards-2.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268941,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/23\/himachal-pradesh-high-court-lack-of-immediate-remedy-under-arbitration-act-not-a-ground-to-challenge-an-arbitral-order-passed-on-miscellaneous-application-before-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":204135,"position":4},"title":"Himachal Pradesh High Court | Lack of immediate remedy under Arbitration Act not a ground to challenge an arbitral order passed on miscellaneous application before High Court","author":"Editor","date":"June 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: In the case where it was argued before the Court that the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short \u201c1996 Act\u201d) does not provide for any remedy to challenge an arbitral order and was hence, against the \u201cpublic policy of India\u201d, Satyen Vaidya J. observed that,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Himachal Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/himachal_pradesh_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357787,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/25\/contours-writ-jurisdiction-in-arbitration-landscape\/","url_meta":{"origin":204135,"position":5},"title":"Balancing Fairness and Efficiency: Contours of Writ Jurisdiction in the Arbitration Landscape","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Arush Khanna* and Akarsh Pandey**","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Writ Jurisdiction in Arbitration","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Writ-Jurisdiction-in-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Writ-Jurisdiction-in-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Writ-Jurisdiction-in-Arbitration.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Writ-Jurisdiction-in-Arbitration.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204135"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204135\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}