{"id":203912,"date":"2018-10-17T18:00:26","date_gmt":"2018-10-17T12:30:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203912"},"modified":"2018-10-22T13:33:07","modified_gmt":"2018-10-22T08:03:07","slug":"a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/","title":{"rendered":"A decision is an authority for what it actually decides: final awards passed, under the Land Acquisition Act, not be reopened casually"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., dismissed writ petitions filed against the order of the trial judge, whereby petitioner\u2019s application under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was dismissed.<\/p>\n

The main issue that arose before the Court was whether the executing court has powers to decide rival claims for apportionment of the award after the award has attained finality.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the CPC in its substantive part is not made applicable to the proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act. The Court referred to the Supreme Court judgment of Ambey Devi v. State of Bihar<\/em>, (1996) 9 SCC 84<\/a> wherein it was observed that the scheme of the Land Acquisition Act is inconsistent with the CPC; the Code provides only the procedural format to adjudicate the dispute. The Court further referred to the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Kothamasu Kanakarathamma v. State of A.P.<\/em>, AIR 1965 SC 304<\/a>, wherein it was held that the jurisdiction of the court arises only when a reference is made to it by the Collector under Section 18 or Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. Further, the court to which reference is made by the collector, cannot go beyond the point of reference by assuming jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

The Court held that if a person like petitioneris allowed to raise dispute with regard to apportionment of the award in execution stage then it would enable the Land Acquisition Officer to reopen a final award as against Section 12 of the Land Acquisition Act. An award can only be reopened by the court if an application is made to it under Section 18 of the Act by the collector or if it is challenged under the provisions of Section 54 of the Act. A decision is an authority for what it actually decides. The Court concluded by holding that Section 47 of CPC does not contemplate an enquiry into the disputed questions of title nor can a claim such as the one raised by the petitioner can be adjudicated under it. Claims for partition cannot be entertained by the executing court. Resultantly, the writ petitions were dismissed by the Court. [Shankar Choudhary v. State of Jharkhand,2018 SCC OnLine Jhar 1221<\/a>, order dated 13-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., dismissed writ petitions filed against the order of the trial judge, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32124,32122,14531,32125,32123],"class_list":["post-203912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-apportionment-of-award","tag-final-awards","tag-land-acquisition-act","tag-rival-claims","tag-section-47-of-the-code-of-civil-procedure-1908"],"yoast_head":"\nA decision is an authority for what it actually decides: final awards passed, under the Land Acquisition Act, not be reopened casually | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A decision is an authority for what it actually decides: final awards passed, under the Land Acquisition Act, not be reopened casually\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., dismissed writ petitions filed against the order of the trial judge,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-17T12:30:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-22T08:03:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/\",\"name\":\"A decision is an authority for what it actually decides: final awards passed, under the Land Acquisition Act, not be reopened casually | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-17T12:30:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-22T08:03:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A decision is an authority for what it actually decides: final awards passed, under the Land Acquisition Act, not be reopened casually\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A decision is an authority for what it actually decides: final awards passed, under the Land Acquisition Act, not be reopened casually | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A decision is an authority for what it actually decides: final awards passed, under the Land Acquisition Act, not be reopened casually","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., dismissed writ petitions filed against the order of the trial judge,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-17T12:30:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-22T08:03:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/","name":"A decision is an authority for what it actually decides: final awards passed, under the Land Acquisition Act, not be reopened casually | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-17T12:30:26+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-22T08:03:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/17\/a-decision-is-an-authority-for-what-it-actually-decides-final-awards-passed-under-the-land-acquisition-act-not-be-reopened-casually\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A decision is an authority for what it actually decides: final awards passed, under the Land Acquisition Act, not be reopened casually"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":137711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/trial-court-can-review-its-own-order-under-the-land-acquisition-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":203912,"position":0},"title":"Trial court can review its own order under the Land Acquisition Act","author":"Saba","date":"June 20, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Court comprising Shalini Phansalkar Joshi, J. held that a trial court can review its own award to bring it in tune with the amended provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984. The petitioners had stated that the trial court has no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320388,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/19\/objections-under-s-47-cpc-applicable-to-execution-of-decrees-not-maintainable-against-arbitral-awards-allahabad-hc-imposes-5-lakhs-state-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":203912,"position":1},"title":"‘Objections under S. 47 CPC are applicable only to execution of decrees not maintainable against arbitral awards\u2019; Allahabad HC imposes Rs 5 lakhs cost on State","author":"Editor","date":"April 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cImposition of costs in cases of frivolous litigation is essential to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and fairness of the judicial system. By deterring abuse of the legal process, promoting judicial efficiency, and upholding the principles of fairness and justice, cost imposition serves to safeguard the rights of individuals, protect the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335560,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/20\/arbitral-award-enforceable-wherever-it-can-be-executed\/","url_meta":{"origin":203912,"position":2},"title":"Arbitral Award treated as deemed decree; Execution can be initiated anywhere such decree can be executed: Allahabad HC","author":"Editor","date":"November 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court reiterated that Arbitration Act transcends all territorial barriers.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235418,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/07\/bom-hc-discusses-law-regarding-determination-of-compensation-and-statutory-interest-in-land-acquisition-matters\/","url_meta":{"origin":203912,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC discusses law regarding determination of compensation and statutory interest in Land Acquisition matters","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0B.U. Debadwar, J., observed the difference between Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in determining the award to be granted to a person, in the absence of an exact date of possession. Respondent--claimant was the exclusive owner in possession of the lands situated to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":111201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/03\/no-application-can-be-filed-under-section-28-a-of-land-acquisition-act-1894-subsequent-to-the-same-being-filed-under-section-18-of-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":203912,"position":4},"title":"No application can be filed under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 subsequent to the same being filed under Section 18 of the Act","author":"Saba","date":"March 3, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Recently, an issue arose\u00a0before the Court as to\u00a0whether a person interested, who has not accepted the award made under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and has filed an application before the Collector under Section 18 of the Act, can file an application under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":376282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/bom-hc-systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":203912,"position":5},"title":"Acquisition without Compensation is Unconstitutional: Bombay HC criticises State over Systemic Failure in Land Acquisition Proceedings","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA large number of cases disclosed unjustified delay of nearly three decades in completing land acquisition proceedings even after taking possession of the petitioners\u2019 lands which resulted not only in grave prejudice to the landowners but also in substantial and avoidable financial burden on the public exchequer.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"systemic failure in land acquisition proceedings","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203912\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}