{"id":203777,"date":"2018-10-15T14:15:25","date_gmt":"2018-10-15T08:45:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203777"},"modified":"2018-11-29T15:28:52","modified_gmt":"2018-11-29T09:58:52","slug":"appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order"},"content":{"rendered":"

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi:<\/strong> A Division bench comprising of N.K. Patil, J. and\u00a0S.D. Dubey (Technical Member) allowed an appeal, filed against Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, holding that the order of Commission was a non-speaking order.<\/p>\n

Appellant, a joint venture company between National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. and Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd., was working on a project for development of a 1320 MW coal-based generating station at Meja in Uttar Pradesh. Respondent is the regulator which determines generation and transmission tariff for central government-owned or controlled companies including the appellant.<\/p>\n

In a petition, the respondent passed an order directing appellant to pay Interest during Construction (IDC) and Incidental Expenditure during Construction (IEDC) for the period of delay in commissioning of Meja-Allahabad line and also for payment of transmission tariff. Aggrieved by the said order, the present appeal was preferred by the appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2013. The sole point of challenge in the appeal was that the order passed by respondent is a non-speaking order bereft of any analysis or reasons, and while passing the impugned order, the respondent Commission had failed to consider the relevant material placed on record by the appellant.<\/p>\n

After perusing the order passed by the respondent Commission, the Hon\u2019ble Appellate Tribunal noted that there was no discussion, reasoning or finding therein in relation to the case of appellant. Relying on the judgment of Apex Court in Commissioner of Police, Bombay v Gordhandas Bhanji, <\/em>1952 SCR 135<\/a>, the Tribunal observed that it is a settled principle of law that an order passed by a statutory body should speak for itself, and cannot be supplemented later with fresh reasons. Public orders, publicly made, in the exercise of statutory authority cannot be construed in the light of explanations subsequently given by the officer making the order. Since such an order has a public effect and also affects the acts and conduct of those to whom it is addressed, it must be construed objectively with reference to the language used in the order itself.<\/p>\n

On the aforesaid reasoning, finding that there was no reasoning or discussion in the respondent\u2019s order, the Tribunal held that the said order being a non-speaking order was liable to be set aside. [Meja Urja Nigam Private Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission,2018 SCC OnLine APTEL 103<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-09-2018]<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi: A Division bench comprising of N.K. Patil, J. and\u00a0S.D. Dubey (Technical Member) allowed an appeal, filed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":152743,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[32092,29540,11611,32091],"class_list":["post-203777","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-no-reasoning","tag-non-speaking-order","tag-principles-of-natural-justice","tag-statutory-body"],"yoast_head":"\nAppellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi: A Division bench comprising of N.K. Patil, J. and\u00a0S.D. Dubey (Technical Member) allowed an appeal, filed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-15T08:45:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-29T09:58:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/\",\"name\":\"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-15T08:45:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-29T09:58:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order","og_description":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi: A Division bench comprising of N.K. Patil, J. and\u00a0S.D. Dubey (Technical Member) allowed an appeal, filed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-15T08:45:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-29T09:58:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/","name":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg","datePublished":"2018-10-15T08:45:25+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-29T09:58:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296446,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/10\/state-commissions-cannot-decide-trade-margins-ists-power-projects-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":203777,"position":0},"title":"State Commissions cannot modify tariff adopted by Central Commission and adopt trade margin for ISTS power projects: APTEL","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"APTEL said that in accordance with the guidelines and the CERC Regulations, the Appropriate Commission, the trading margin shall be decided mutually by the SECI, the trading licensee and the WPPs and in turn by the distribution licensees.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"appellate tribunal for electricity","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279853,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reiterates-that-principle-that-governs-compensating-a-party-for-the-time-value-for-money-would-be-applied-for-grant-of-interest-on-carrying\/","url_meta":{"origin":203777,"position":1},"title":"Principle that governs compensating a party for the time value for money would be applied for grant of interest on carrying cost on account of a change in law event; Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"December 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The interest in \u2018carrying cost' is nothing but time value for money and the only way a party can be afforded the benefit of restitution in every which way.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-511.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":297059,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/18\/aptel-relieves-tata-power-through-interim-stay-against-merc-order-fixing-higher-tariff\/","url_meta":{"origin":203777,"position":2},"title":"Relief for Tata Power | APTEL stays MERC’s tariff schedule for FY 2023-24","author":"Editor","date":"July 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Tribunal regarded the hike in violation of Section 61(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and against the larger public interest, which is one of the critical factors to be taken into consideration in deciding whether to grant interim relief.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"appellate tribunal for electricity","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236774,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/05\/aptel-norms-can-be-relaxed-in-certain-cases-to-allow-appellant-to-recover-its-full-fixed-cost-instead-of-normative-the-interest-of-justice-and-equity-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":203777,"position":3},"title":"APTEL | Norms can be relaxed in certain cases to allow appellant to recover its full fixed cost instead of normative the interest of justice and equity; Tribunal allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"October 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL): A Coram of Manjula Chellur, J. (Chairperson) and S.D. Dubey (Technical Member), allowed an appeal which was filed under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against order passed by the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (State Commission) whereby the State Commission had rejected the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Central-Regulatory-Electricity-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Central-Regulatory-Electricity-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Central-Regulatory-Electricity-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Central-Regulatory-Electricity-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Central-Regulatory-Electricity-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224214,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":203777,"position":4},"title":"APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL): A Coram of Justice Manjula Chellur (Chairperson) and S.D. Dubey, (Technical Member) allowed an appeal filed against an impugned order passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. The counsel for the appellant Anand K. Ganesan, Swapna Seshadri,\u00a0 Ashwin Ramanathan and Utkarsh Singh had submitted that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/maharashtra-state-electricity-distribution-co-ltd-directed-to-pay-dues-of-rs-2-300-crore-to-the-ratnagiri-gas-and-power-pvt-ltd\/","url_meta":{"origin":203777,"position":5},"title":"Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. directed to pay dues of Rs 2,300 crore to the Ratnagiri Gas and Power Pvt. Ltd.","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 28, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL):\u00a0While upholding the order of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission vide which Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) was directed to pay the capacity charges and energy charges as per terms and conditions of the Power Purchase Agreement, APTEL asked MSEDCL to pay dues of Rs\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203777"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203777\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/152743"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}