{"id":203762,"date":"2018-10-15T12:30:19","date_gmt":"2018-10-15T07:00:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203762"},"modified":"2018-10-18T11:46:54","modified_gmt":"2018-10-18T06:16:54","slug":"in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/","title":{"rendered":"In service matters, fence sitters are not entitled to the benefits of a Court order delivered in favour of their counterparts \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J., dismissed a writ petition whereby the petitioner sought directions against respondents for granting him the benefit of Jammu & Kashmir Civil Services (Revised) Pay Rules, 1973 (the 1973 Rules) with effect from the date of his first appointment in the year with consequential benefits of subsequent pay revisions.<\/p>\n

The main issue that arose before the Court was whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefits under the 1973 Rules.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the petitioner did not raise any objection when he was regularized initially. Further, the petitioner did not raise any objection with regard to the timely pay scale revisions which were given to him and it was only after the High Court decided a petition filed by some other aggrieved persons who were somewhat similarly situated as the petitioner, that the petitioner raised his voice. The Court observed that the petitioner was nothing but a fence sitter who was waiting for the outcome of an ongoing litigation. The Court referred to the Supreme Court judgment in the case of State of U.P. v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava, <\/em>(2015) 1 SCC 347<\/a>, wherein It was held that when a specific group of employees are given a benefit by the Court it shall apply to all the persons similarly situated to the litigants, however, there is an exception if the similarly situated persons are liable for laches and delays as well as acquiescence.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the petitioner remained silent for a good amount of time and woke up after long delay only because of the reason that his counterparts who had approached the Court earlier in time succeeded in their efforts. Hence the petitioner cannot claim the benefit conferred upon the employees who were similarly situated to him and who had successfully won the litigation. Resultantly, the writ petition was dismissed by the Court. [Mangat Ram v. State of J&K,2018 SCC OnLine J&K 712<\/b><\/a>, order dated 05-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J., dismissed a writ petition whereby the petitioner sought directions <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32089,32088,14791],"class_list":["post-203762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-consequential-benefits","tag-pay-revisions","tag-service-matters"],"yoast_head":"\nIn service matters, fence sitters are not entitled to the benefits of a Court order delivered in favour of their counterparts \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In service matters, fence sitters are not entitled to the benefits of a Court order delivered in favour of their counterparts \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J., dismissed a writ petition whereby the petitioner sought directions\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-15T07:00:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-18T06:16:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/\",\"name\":\"In service matters, fence sitters are not entitled to the benefits of a Court order delivered in favour of their counterparts \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-15T07:00:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-18T06:16:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In service matters, fence sitters are not entitled to the benefits of a Court order delivered in favour of their counterparts \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In service matters, fence sitters are not entitled to the benefits of a Court order delivered in favour of their counterparts \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In service matters, fence sitters are not entitled to the benefits of a Court order delivered in favour of their counterparts \u00a0","og_description":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J., dismissed a writ petition whereby the petitioner sought directions","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-15T07:00:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-18T06:16:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/","name":"In service matters, fence sitters are not entitled to the benefits of a Court order delivered in favour of their counterparts \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-15T07:00:19+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-18T06:16:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/in-service-matters-fence-sitters-are-not-entitled-to-the-benefits-of-a-court-order-delivered-in-favour-of-their-counterparts\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In service matters, fence sitters are not entitled to the benefits of a Court order delivered in favour of their counterparts \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":302635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/29\/delhi-hc-period-treated-as-not-spent-on-duty-must-be-construed-for-back-wages-and-not-for-seniority-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":203762,"position":0},"title":"Period treated as \u2018not spent on duty\u2019 must be construed for back wages and not for seniority and promotion: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSubsistence allowance is not a largesse, but the statutory right of an employee, and any denial of the same would amount to violation of Article 21 of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338265,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/02\/jk-and-ladakh-high-court-urges-criminal-courts-to-remain-sensitive-and-avoid-copy-paste-syndrome-in-bail-matters-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":203762,"position":1},"title":"J&K and Ladakh High Court urges Criminal Courts to \u201cremain sensitive\u201d and avoid \u201cCopy-Paste Syndrome\u201d while deciding Bail matters","author":"Ritu","date":"January 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven a single day\u2019s delay in grant of bail to a person who is otherwise entitled to it amounts to violation of his fundamental right to life and liberty.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/02\/retrospective-re-fixation-salary-pensionary-benefits-post-retirement-not-accordance-law-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":203762,"position":2},"title":"Retrospective re-fixation of salary and pensionary benefits post-retirement is not in accordance with law: Madras HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner was retired from service by superannuation and hence, the employer - employee relationship between the petitioner and the University had come to an end and hence, the University holds no Authority to re-fix the salary and the consequential benefits of the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/19\/employee-service-interruption-retirement-benefits-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":203762,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Employee not at fault for service interruption; entitled to all service benefits\u2019; Madras HC directs authorities to grant retirement benefits to former Village Administrative Officer","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe respondents cannot take a stand that since the petitioner did not serve during the period, on the percept of 'no work no pay' his pay was fixed notionally to enable him to get pensionary benefits. The said contention of the respondents is untenable and unsustainable in the eye of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319012,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/01\/employees-have-legitimate-expectation-to-receive-same-benefits-as-offered-to-similarly-situated-employees-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":203762,"position":4},"title":"Employees have legitimate expectation to receive same benefits as offered to similarly situated employees: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court held that the respondent has no authority to make a discrimination among the similarly situated employees for no good reason.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306322,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/03\/himachal-pradesh-hc-grants-service-benefits-to-employees-from-initial-appointment-on-contract-basis-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":203762,"position":5},"title":"State is not expected to deprive lawful benefits of employees; Himachal Pradesh HC grants service benefits to employees from initial date of appointment on contract basis","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt appears, in order to avoid its liability to pay salary attached to the post and to deprive the employees from lawful service benefits available to them, exploitative policy of contract appointment for initial five years is being adopted and practiced.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203762\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}