{"id":203547,"date":"2018-10-12T17:00:32","date_gmt":"2018-10-12T11:30:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203547"},"modified":"2018-10-12T17:09:56","modified_gmt":"2018-10-12T11:39:56","slug":"necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Necessary to prove twin conditions of \u2018demand\u2019 and \u2018acceptance\u2019 of bribe in a case under PC Act; appellant acquitted for failure thereof: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/strong>A bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of Delhi High Court wherein it upheld the order of the trial court convicting the appellant under Sections 7,13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.<\/p>\n

The appellant was an employee of the Delhi Electricity Supply Undertaking, working on the post of Inspector at the time relevant. An FIR was filed against him and one Rajinder Kumar, another employee of DESU, wherein it was alleged that the appellant had demanded Rs 4000 for installation of electricity connection in complainant\u2019s factory. On the basis of FIR, the CBI formed a raiding party and the whole procedure was followed. On the scene, the appellant asked the complainant to hand over the money to Rajinder Kumar. As soon as Rajinder Kumar accepted the money, the raiding party came in and the accused were caught. The trial court convicted the appellant as aforestated. However, Rajinder Kumar was acquitted from all the charges. It is pertinent to note that both the accused were acquitted of the charge under Section 120-B IPC (criminal conspiracy). The appellant filed an appeal to the High Court which was dismissed.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court, sitting in appeal, perused the record and noted that the case of the prosecution was that the appellant conspired with Rajinder Kumar to accept illegal gratification from the complainant. The Court was of the opinion that once Rajinder Kumar and the appellant stood acquitted of the charge of conspiracy and further, Rajinder Kumar was acquitted of the charges under PC Act, the charged against the appellant must also fall on the ground. Furthermore, in order to prove its case against the appellant, it was necessary for the prosecution to prove twin requirements of demand <\/em>and acceptance <\/em>of the bribe amount by the appellant. It was the case of the prosecution that the money was accepted by Rajinder Kumar and since the accused were acquitted of the charge of conspiracy, it could not be said that Rajinder Kumar accepted the money as illegal gratification for it on behalf of the appellant. In such circumstances, there was no evidence to prove that the appellant accepted <\/em>the money from the complainant. Resultantly, the Court held that the judgment impugned requires interference which was accordingly set aside. The appeal was. allowed and the appellant was acquitted of all the charges. [Dashrath Singh Chauhan v. CBI,\u00a02018 SCC OnLine SC 1841<\/a>, decided on 09-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: A bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of Delhi High <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[32083,2680,30592,32084],"class_list":["post-203547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-acceptance","tag-bribe","tag-demand","tag-prevention-of-corruption-act-1988"],"yoast_head":"\nNecessary to prove twin conditions of \u2018demand\u2019 and \u2018acceptance\u2019 of bribe in a case under PC Act; appellant acquitted for failure thereof: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Necessary to prove twin conditions of \u2018demand\u2019 and \u2018acceptance\u2019 of bribe in a case under PC Act; appellant acquitted for failure thereof: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: A bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of Delhi High\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-12T11:30:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-12T11:39:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Necessary to prove twin conditions of \u2018demand\u2019 and \u2018acceptance\u2019 of bribe in a case under PC Act; appellant acquitted for failure thereof: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-12T11:30:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-12T11:39:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Necessary to prove twin conditions of \u2018demand\u2019 and \u2018acceptance\u2019 of bribe in a case under PC Act; appellant acquitted for failure thereof: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Necessary to prove twin conditions of \u2018demand\u2019 and \u2018acceptance\u2019 of bribe in a case under PC Act; appellant acquitted for failure thereof: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Necessary to prove twin conditions of \u2018demand\u2019 and \u2018acceptance\u2019 of bribe in a case under PC Act; appellant acquitted for failure thereof: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court: A bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of Delhi High","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-12T11:30:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-12T11:39:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/","name":"Necessary to prove twin conditions of \u2018demand\u2019 and \u2018acceptance\u2019 of bribe in a case under PC Act; appellant acquitted for failure thereof: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-10-12T11:30:32+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-12T11:39:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/12\/necessary-to-prove-twin-conditions-of-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-in-a-case-under-pc-act-appellant-acquitted-for-failure-thereof-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Necessary to prove twin conditions of \u2018demand\u2019 and \u2018acceptance\u2019 of bribe in a case under PC Act; appellant acquitted for failure thereof: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":314070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/mere-recovery-of-amount-cannot-prove-alleged-demand-of-bribe-thc-sets-aside-conviction-against-sub-inspector-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":203547,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Mere recovery of amount cannot prove alleged demand of bribe\u2019; Telangana HC sets aside conviction against Sub-Inspector of Police","author":"Editor","date":"February 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Investigating Officer becomes functus officio when charge sheet is filed after investigation, unless there will be further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":32111,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/08\/corruption-charges-against-police-constable-for-receiving-bribe-struck-down\/","url_meta":{"origin":203547,"position":1},"title":"Corruption charges against police constable for receiving bribe, struck down","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 8, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While reversing the decision laid down by the High Court with respect to the conviction of the appellant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, T.S. Thakur, CJ. and V. Gopala Gowda, J. held that there is no substantive evidence to prove demand of illegal gratification from the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197270,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/20\/making-demand-of-bribe-is-essential-to-establish-the-culpability-of-a-person-accused-of-taking-illegal-gratification-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-1988\/","url_meta":{"origin":203547,"position":2},"title":"Making \u2018demand\u2019 of bribe is essential to establish the culpability of a person accused of taking illegal gratification under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manish Pitale, J. allowed a criminal appeal setting aside the order of conviction and sentence under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, passed by the trial court against the appellant. The appellant, who worked as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":188064,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/11\/demand-acceptance-gratification-must-proved-offence-s-7-prevention-corruption-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":203547,"position":3},"title":"Demand and acceptance of gratification must be proved for an offence under s.7, Prevention of Corruption Act","author":"Saba","date":"February 11, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: A criminal appeal filed under Section 374 of CrPC was decided by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Hitesh Kumar Sarma, J., wherein the order of conviction passed against the appellant-accused by the CBI Court was set aside, holding that the essential ingredients of Section 7 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":142931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/17\/mere-recovery-of-bribe-would-not-prove-charges-against-the-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":203547,"position":4},"title":"Mere recovery of bribe would not prove charges against the accused","author":"Saba","date":"July 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0While deciding a criminal appeal preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, a Bench comprising of Amitava, J., set aside the judgment and order of the High Court which had convicted a police officer of taking bribes. The appellant (now deceased and represented by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264220,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/24\/trap-party-recovers-tainted-currency-notes-from-tax-officer-accused-of-demanding-bribe-read-why-supreme-court-acquitted-the-officer-in-spite-of-proved-recovery\/","url_meta":{"origin":203547,"position":5},"title":"Trap party recovers tainted currency notes from Tax Officer accused of demanding bribe. Read why Supreme Court acquitted the officer in spite of proved recovery","author":"Editor","date":"March 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an interesting case relating to corruption, the Division Bench of Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka*, JJ., acquitted a Commercial Tax Officer in spite of proved recovery of tainted currency notes from her. The Bench observed that though the recovery was proved in the absence of demand\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203547\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}