{"id":203346,"date":"2018-10-09T14:49:15","date_gmt":"2018-10-09T09:19:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203346"},"modified":"2018-10-15T16:58:44","modified_gmt":"2018-10-15T11:28:44","slug":"matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/","title":{"rendered":"Matters not raised on previous litigation not covered by res judicata; no illegality found in the order of Central Administrative Tribunal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Allahabad High Court: <\/strong>A writ petition was filed by Union of India and the Railway Administration before a \u00a0Division Bench comprising of B. Amit Sthalekar and Jayant Banerji, JJ., with a prayer to quash the order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal where original application filed by respondent to set aside order debarring petitioner from giving RRB exams, was allowed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case are that respondent applied for the post of Junior Engineer-II (Mechanical), Junior Engineer-II (Mechanical CADCAM) and Junior Engineer-II (Carriage and Wagon) through RRB. Respondent gave a written test in which he was declared passed. After the completion of the verification process when the final results were declared respondent\u2019s name was not found. After inquiry by respondent to the concerned authority he got to know that he had been barred for lifetime from all RRB exams. It was informed to Nodal RRB that RRB Chennai had informed that he had been debarred. RRB Chennai informed him that it had not debarred him but the same had been done by Mumbai RRB. Later, it was found that RRB Mumbai barred respondent on the ground that he submitted two applications with different photographs for post of Apprentice Engineer (Mechanical). Respondent had challenged this order in his application. Petitioner approached Tribunal where Tribunal favoured respondent holding that order of debarment was unreasonable, unjust, and arbitrary and his natural rights had been violated. Therefore, respondent\u2019s original application was allowed and concerned authority was directed to consider the candidature of respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The railway prayed for setting aside of Tribunal\u2019s order on the ground that respondent had committed fraud on Railway Authority by submitting two application. Petitioner submitted that earlier respondent had filed an original application before Chandigarh Tribunal where it was dismissed and thus original application was filed before Central Administrative Tribunal and thus was not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court was of the view that Chandigarh Tribunal dismissed the original application with a liberty to file a fresh application and the issues, in this case, were not decided by Tribunal, therefore, this will not act as res judicata. Petitioner failed to show any record when the debarment of respondent was communicated to him. Therefore, the court found no merit in the petition and the petition was dismissed. [Union of India v. Javier,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/k2HOlS37\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine All 1782<\/b><\/a>, order dated 05-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: A writ petition was filed by Union of India and the Railway Administration before a \u00a0Division Bench comprising of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32029,32031,5353,32030],"class_list":["post-203346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-central-administrative-tribunal","tag-debar","tag-res-judicata","tag-rrb-exams"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Matters not raised on previous litigation not covered by res judicata; no illegality found in the order of Central Administrative Tribunal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Matters not raised on previous litigation not covered by res judicata; no illegality found in the order of Central Administrative Tribunal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: A writ petition was filed by Union of India and the Railway Administration before a \u00a0Division Bench comprising of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-09T09:19:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-15T11:28:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/\",\"name\":\"Matters not raised on previous litigation not covered by res judicata; no illegality found in the order of Central Administrative Tribunal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-09T09:19:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-15T11:28:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Matters not raised on previous litigation not covered by res judicata; no illegality found in the order of Central Administrative Tribunal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Matters not raised on previous litigation not covered by res judicata; no illegality found in the order of Central Administrative Tribunal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Matters not raised on previous litigation not covered by res judicata; no illegality found in the order of Central Administrative Tribunal","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: A writ petition was filed by Union of India and the Railway Administration before a \u00a0Division Bench comprising of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-09T09:19:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-15T11:28:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/","name":"Matters not raised on previous litigation not covered by res judicata; no illegality found in the order of Central Administrative Tribunal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-09T09:19:15+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-15T11:28:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/matters-not-raised-on-previous-litigation-not-covered-by-res-judicata-no-illegality-found-in-the-order-of-central-administrative-tribunal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Matters not raised on previous litigation not covered by res judicata; no illegality found in the order of Central Administrative Tribunal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219018,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/02\/jhar-hc-tribunal-is-supposed-to-answer-any-reference-by-considering-evidence-and-pleading-of-parties-not-simply-by-relying-upon-precedent\/","url_meta":{"origin":203346,"position":0},"title":"Jhar HC | Tribunal is supposed to answer any reference by considering evidence and pleading of parties, not simply by relying upon precedent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Rajesh Kumar, J., allowed the petition filed by the petitioner stating that the tribunal has failed to pass a reasoned order by considering the evidence and pleading of the parties. In the pertinent case, the petitioner moved to this Court for quashing of the award passed in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221613,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/kar-hc-post-to-be-granted-to-eligible-candidate-quashing-of-final-selection-list-for-the-post-of-junior-engineer-elect-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":203346,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Post to be granted to eligible candidate; Quashing of final selection list for the post of Junior Engineer (Elect.) rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court:\u00a0R. Devdas, J., while dismissing this petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India observed that the main matter itself was disposed of. The petitioner, Arun had filed this petition to pray for the quashing of the final selection list of the post of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242033,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/09\/ker-hc-from-promotions-to-vacancies-even-where-there-is-no-direct-recruitment-the-3-quota-for-disabled-persons-has-to-be-complied-with-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":203346,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | From promotions to vacancies, even where there is no direct recruitment, the 3% quota for disabled persons has to be complied with; HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of K. Vinod Chandran and V. G. Arun, JJ., addressed the present petition filed by BSNL against the order of Central Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal had upheld the claim of the respondent for consideration of promotion as Sub Divisional Engineer (\u201cSDE\u201d) in 3% disability\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/30\/all-hc-whether-res-judicata-will-apply-where-issue-of-negligence-already-decided-by-competent-tribunal-in-claim-arising-out-of-same-accident-court-examines\/","url_meta":{"origin":203346,"position":3},"title":"All HC | Whether res judicata will apply where issue of negligence already decided by competent Tribunal in claim arising out of same accident? Court examines","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0Dr Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J., while addressing the matter observed that: \"...where there are multiple claims, MACT should place all the matters before the same Tribunal and the same tribunal should consolidate the matter and decide the same.\"\u00a0 The instant appeal was at the behest of the claimants\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":285221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/25\/classification-of-posts-and-determination-of-pay-structure-falls-within-exclusive-domain-of-executive-judicial-courts-and-tribunals-cannot-interfere-supreme-court-reiterates-legal-news-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":203346,"position":4},"title":"Classification of posts and determination of pay structure falls within Executive&#8217;s exclusive domain, Courts and Tribunals should not interfere; Supreme Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"February 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe wisdom and advisability of the Courts in the matters concerning the finance, are ordinarily not amenable to judicial review unless a gross case of arbitrariness or unfairness is established by the aggrieved party.\u201d, observed Supreme Court","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-537.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-537.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-537.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-537.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/10\/conundrum-of-res-judicata-and-rejection-of-plaint\/","url_meta":{"origin":203346,"position":5},"title":"Conundrum of res judicata and rejection of plaint: SC summarises guiding principles for deciding an application under Or. 7 R. 11(d) CPC\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dr D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, JJ. upheld the order of the Karnataka High Court whereby an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC (Rejection of plaint) filed by the appellant was dismissed.\u00a0 While deciding the appeal, the Supreme Court summarised the guiding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203346"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203346\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}