{"id":203277,"date":"2018-10-08T15:00:50","date_gmt":"2018-10-08T09:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203277"},"modified":"2018-10-18T09:50:52","modified_gmt":"2018-10-18T04:20:52","slug":"failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Failure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court:<\/strong> The petition had been filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Anjani Kumar Mishra, J., from the proceeding going on under Section 34 of the Land Revenue Act, for mutation. This order of mutation was filed by Tehsildar in favour of respondent. Petitioner contended that the above order was passed ex-parte in a restoration application which was rejected by Tehsildar.<\/p>\n

Petitioner aggrieved by the rejection of the restoration application filed a revision petition before Additional Commissioner which was allowed. Later, the order which rejected the recall application and order of mutation was set aside. The restoration application reveals that petitioner claimed to be the second wife of one Bhunesh after whose death the mutation proceedings were filed. It was found that petitioner failed to show that she was the second wife of Bhunesh thus her restoration application was rejected.<\/p>\n

The High Court observed that the order in question seemed perverse where petitioner failed to provide evidence to establish her position as the second wife. Court was of the view that this matter requires consideration and the matter was disposed of. [Mamta v. State of U.P.,2018 SCC OnLine All 1784<\/b><\/a>, dated 05-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court: The petition had been filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Anjani Kumar Mishra, J., from the proceeding <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3460,2521,32018,32017],"class_list":["post-203277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-claims","tag-Evidence","tag-land-revenue-act","tag-mutation"],"yoast_head":"\nFailure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Failure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: The petition had been filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Anjani Kumar Mishra, J., from the proceeding\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-08T09:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-18T04:20:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/\",\"name\":\"Failure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-08T09:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-18T04:20:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Failure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Failure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Failure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: The petition had been filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Anjani Kumar Mishra, J., from the proceeding","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-08T09:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-18T04:20:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/","name":"Failure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-08T09:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-18T04:20:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/failure-of-petitioner-to-provide-relevant-evidence-to-her-claims-held-needs-consideration-in-matter-under-land-revenue-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Failure of petitioner to provide relevant evidence to her claims, held needs consideration in matter under Land Revenue Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":341840,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/19\/tehsildar-cant-decide-mutation-applications-based-on-disputed-testamentary-documents-particularly-a-will-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":203277,"position":0},"title":"Tehsildar can\u2019t decide mutation applications based on disputed testamentary documents, particularly a Will: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRevenue Officers, including the Tehsildar, do not have judicial authority to resolve disputes related to wills or non-testamentary documents. These matters must be decided by the Civil Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/revenue-courts-power-order-rubber-stamp-seal-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":203277,"position":1},"title":"Revenue Courts cannot pass order by using rubber stamp seal: Allahabad HC directs Board of Revenue to apprise Courts, the way order sheet should be drawn","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court had cleared that it has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Authority\/Court concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363797,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/15\/legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":203277,"position":2},"title":"Absence of one legal heir from partition deed not valid ground to refuse mutation of property: Kerala HC directs Tehsildar to effect property’s mutation","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA share was earmarked to the excluded sharer as well, even though the same might not preclude the rights of the excluded sharer to challenge the partnership deed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Legal heir's absence no ground to refuse mutation of property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Legal-heirs-absence-no-ground-to-refuse-mutation-of-property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/04\/mp-hc-condemns-revenue-officers-misconduct-orders-disciplinary-actions-directs-6-months-training-to-enhance-judicial-understanding-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":203277,"position":3},"title":"Revenue officers\u2019 inability to understand Court orders leads to MP High Court directing 6 Months training to enhance Judicial understanding","author":"Ritu","date":"August 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court directed the revenue officer to undergo a six-month training program to improve their understanding of judicial and quasi-judicial responsibilities when they pleaded inability to understand court order to reopen mutation file.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":203277,"position":4},"title":"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of trial court whereby petitioner\u2019s application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC was rejected. In the abovesaid application, the petitioner had prayed to the court that a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213466,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":203277,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Vivek Rusia, J. Facts of the case were such that petitioners are daughters of respondent who had sold his property to other respondents. After the sale was concluded one of the respondent to whom the property was sold\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203277\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}