{"id":203258,"date":"2018-10-08T11:00:11","date_gmt":"2018-10-08T05:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203258"},"modified":"2018-10-18T13:36:52","modified_gmt":"2018-10-18T08:06:52","slug":"counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/","title":{"rendered":"Counter-claim is in the nature of a cross-suit and dismissal of suit does not automatically terminate proceedings in counter-claim"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:<\/strong> A Single judge bench comprising of R. Narayana Pisharadi, J. while dealing with an appeal filed against an order dismissing the petition for divorce, held that the dismissal of a suit does not have the effect of automatically terminating proceedings in the counter-claim.<\/p>\n

In the present case, respondent- husband had filed a petition in the Family Court for granting decree of divorce. The appellant- wife filed a written statement along with counter-claim against her respondent and his parents for the return of her ornaments. The divorce petition was dismissed for default and hence the present appeal was filed by the appellant contending that the Family Court did not dispose of her counter-claim.<\/p>\n

Relying on the judgment of \u00a0Apex Court in Rajni Rani v Khairati Lal, <\/em>(2015) 2 SCC 682<\/a>, the court stated that a plain reading of Order VIII Rules 6-A (2) and 6D of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 would reveal that a counter-claim preferred by the defendant in a suit is in the nature of a cross-suit and the statute clearly states that even if the suit is dismissed, counter-claim remains alive for adjudication. It was observed that the seminal purpose for the adoption of this approach was to avoid piece-meal adjudication.<\/p>\n

Consequently, High Court directed the Family Court to proceed with the counter-claim filed by the appellant against the respondent and dispose it of as expeditiously as possible. On being apprised that the respondent had filed an application in Family Court for restoration of the divorce petition, the court observed that in the event that the said application is allowed, petition for divorce and the counter-claim be disposed of together by the same judgment as required under Order VIII Rule 6-A (2) CPC. [Raji Mohan v Aji A.S.,2018 SCC OnLine Ker 3487<\/b><\/a>, decided on 27-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of R. Narayana Pisharadi, J. while dealing with an appeal filed against an order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[27604,32012,32013],"class_list":["post-203258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-counter-claim","tag-cross-suit","tag-terminate-proceedings"],"yoast_head":"\nCounter-claim is in the nature of a cross-suit and dismissal of suit does not automatically terminate proceedings in counter-claim | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Counter-claim is in the nature of a cross-suit and dismissal of suit does not automatically terminate proceedings in counter-claim\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of R. Narayana Pisharadi, J. while dealing with an appeal filed against an order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-08T05:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-18T08:06:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/\",\"name\":\"Counter-claim is in the nature of a cross-suit and dismissal of suit does not automatically terminate proceedings in counter-claim | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-08T05:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-18T08:06:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Counter-claim is in the nature of a cross-suit and dismissal of suit does not automatically terminate proceedings in counter-claim\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Counter-claim is in the nature of a cross-suit and dismissal of suit does not automatically terminate proceedings in counter-claim | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Counter-claim is in the nature of a cross-suit and dismissal of suit does not automatically terminate proceedings in counter-claim","og_description":"Kerala High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of R. Narayana Pisharadi, J. while dealing with an appeal filed against an order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-08T05:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-18T08:06:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/","name":"Counter-claim is in the nature of a cross-suit and dismissal of suit does not automatically terminate proceedings in counter-claim | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-08T05:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-18T08:06:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/counter-claim-is-in-the-nature-of-a-cross-suit-and-dismissal-of-suit-does-not-automatically-terminate-proceedings-in-counter-claim\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Counter-claim is in the nature of a cross-suit and dismissal of suit does not automatically terminate proceedings in counter-claim"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255692,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/16\/respondent-cant-seek-declaration-of-petitioners-second-marriage-as-void-as-counter-claim-in-a-divorce-proceeding-relief-cant-be-prayed-qua-third-party-under-section-23a-hma-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":203258,"position":0},"title":"Respondent can’t seek declaration of petitioner’s “second marriage” in a divorce proceeding; Relief can’t be prayed qua third party under Section 23A HMA: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, the relief of divorce, judicial separation etc. can be between the husband and the wife only and cannot extend to the third party.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/02\/cruelty-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":203258,"position":1},"title":"Madras HC | 12 long years of proceedings, but no appearance of wife. Assault on husband’s vital body part, not denied. Can her appeal against dissolution of marriage be still accepted? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: The Division Bench of T. Raja and G. Chandrasekharan, JJ., while upholding the decision of Court below stated that for 12 long years the wife did not appear for any proceedings to disprove the allegations of husband and crucial allegations such as assaulting husband on his vital\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/14\/utt-hc-voluntarily-depriving-husband-of-wifes-company-and-comfort-of-matrimonial-life-amounts-to-cruelty-divorce-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":203258,"position":2},"title":"Utt HC | Voluntarily depriving husband of wife\u2019s company and comfort of matrimonial life amounts to cruelty; Divorce granted\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Narayan Singh Dhanik, JJ. contemplated the special appeals preferred against the judgment of Family Court, where the divorce petition was filed under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and was subsequently dismissed but the counterclaim of the wife-respondent for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":310432,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/31\/sc-compromise-between-parties-is-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-a-suit-for-malicious-prosecution-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":203258,"position":3},"title":"Never Reported Judgment| Compromise between parties is not termination of proceedings in a suit for malicious prosecution [(1952) 2 SCC 446]","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on malicious prosecution.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"compromise not termination of proceedings in malicious prosecution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/compromise-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-malicious-prosecution.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/compromise-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-malicious-prosecution.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/compromise-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-malicious-prosecution.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/compromise-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-malicious-prosecution.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/09\/divorce-proceedings-can-be-stayed-on-non-payment-of-interim-maintenance-only-if-the-petition-for-divorce-has-been-filed-by-the-defaulting-party\/","url_meta":{"origin":203258,"position":4},"title":"Divorce proceedings can be stayed on non-payment of interim maintenance only if the petition for divorce has been filed by the defaulting party","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division bench comprising of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. affirmed the order of Family Court striking off defence of the erring husband but set aside the part of order staying proceedings in a divorce petition instituted by the wife, holding the same to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":298029,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/29\/delhi-hc-taking-recourse-to-law-not-cruelty-unconditional-abandonment-of-claim-constitute-condonation\/","url_meta":{"origin":203258,"position":5},"title":"Taking recourse to \u2018law\u2019 would not amount \u2018cruelty\u2019; Delhi High Court dismisses petition of dissolution of marriage on account of cruelty","author":"Arunima","date":"July 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the peculiar facts of the present case, taking recourse to law, cannot be, by any stretch of imagination, labeled as an instance of cruelty.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203258","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203258"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203258\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}