{"id":203177,"date":"2018-10-05T13:15:27","date_gmt":"2018-10-05T07:45:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203177"},"modified":"2018-10-12T13:36:37","modified_gmt":"2018-10-12T08:06:37","slug":"no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"No departmental proceedings can be initiated against former employee unless provided for by relevant rules"},"content":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sambuddha Chakrabarti, J. allowed a writ petition which sought directions to the respondents to release post retiral benefits of the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was employed at the post of Director (Finance) in National Jute Manufacturers\u2019 Corpn. Ltd. He sought for issuance of a writ in nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to release post retiral benefits including gratuity, leave encashment, maximum allowance and perks as provided for in the conditions of employment. The question for consideration before the High Court was whether NJMC could withhold post retiral benefits of the petitioner on the ground that after his retirement, certain alleged irregularities have been detected.<\/p>\n

The High Court was of the opinion that a departmental enquiry is initiated by issuing a formal chargesheet against a delinquent employee. NJMC may have had a preliminary enquiry which was in nature of an informal enquiry but that was no legal basis to proceed against an employee. Moreover, now the petitioner had retired and it was observed as a settled principle of law that no departmental proceeding can be initiated against a former employee unless the relevant service rules provide for the same. The present was a case where neither NJMC Service Regulations, 1982 nor NJMC (Conduct, Discipline, and Appeal) Rules, 1982 contain any provision for initiation of any departmental proceeding against an employee after his retirement. Thus, no departmental proceeding could be initiated against the petitioner now that he had retired. In such case, the High Court held that respondents had no right to sit over retiral dues not released to the petitioner. They were accordingly directed to release the dues within six weeks with interest. The petition was allowed with costs of Rs 10,000 imposed on NJMC. [Sukanta Kumar Mondal v. National Jute Manufacturers’ Corp. Ltd.,2018 SCC OnLine Cal 6987<\/b><\/a>, dated 27-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sambuddha Chakrabarti, J. allowed a writ petition which sought directions to the respondents <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":52131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31981,30651,6031],"class_list":["post-203177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-departmental-proceedings","tag-employee","tag-retiral-benefits"],"yoast_head":"\nNo departmental proceedings can be initiated against former employee unless provided for by relevant rules | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No departmental proceedings can be initiated against former employee unless provided for by relevant rules\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sambuddha Chakrabarti, J. allowed a writ petition which sought directions to the respondents\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-05T07:45:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-12T08:06:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/\",\"name\":\"No departmental proceedings can be initiated against former employee unless provided for by relevant rules | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-05T07:45:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-12T08:06:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No departmental proceedings can be initiated against former employee unless provided for by relevant rules\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No departmental proceedings can be initiated against former employee unless provided for by relevant rules | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No departmental proceedings can be initiated against former employee unless provided for by relevant rules","og_description":"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sambuddha Chakrabarti, J. allowed a writ petition which sought directions to the respondents","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-05T07:45:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-12T08:06:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/","name":"No departmental proceedings can be initiated against former employee unless provided for by relevant rules | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2018-10-05T07:45:27+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-12T08:06:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/no-departmental-proceedings-can-be-initiated-against-former-employee-unless-provided-for-by-relevant-rules\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No departmental proceedings can be initiated against former employee unless provided for by relevant rules"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":318939,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/31\/taking-away-withholding-retiral-benefits-amounts-to-denial-of-right-to-life-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":203177,"position":0},"title":"Taking away\/withholding retiral benefits amounts to denial of \u2018Right to life\u2019: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court held that retiral benefits are earned by employees for their services and should not be deprived due to non-job-related legal matters.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219299,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/09\/jhar-hc-retiral-benefits-are-not-bounty-to-be-given-to-employees-rather-it-is-right-of-employees-to-get-retiral-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":203177,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Retiral benefits are not bounty to be given to employees; rather, it is right of\u00a0employees to get retiral benefits","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Dr S.N. Pathak, J., allowed the present petition, directing the respondents to make payment of the entire retiral benefits to the petitioner within 10 days. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for payment of his retiral dues i.e. pension, gratuity, arrears of pension\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216958,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/17\/all-hc-government-employee-not-entitled-to-death-cum-retiral-gratuity-until-conclusion-of-departmental-proceedings-or-judicial-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":203177,"position":2},"title":"All HC | Govt. employee not entitled to death cum retiral gratuity until conclusion of departmental proceedings or judicial proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Full Bench of Pankaj Mithal, Suneet Kumar and Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, JJ. dismissed a batch of writ petitions seeking entitlement to receive death-cum-retirement gratuity while judicial proceedings were pending. The petitioners were government employees (Lekhpal\/Police Officials), who had retired on attaining the age of superannuation, and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/10\/high-court-emphasizes-on-role-of-welfare-state-directs-authorities-to-release-pension-and-death-cum-retiral-benefits-within-60-days-or-pay-interest-thereon-from-your-own-pockets\/","url_meta":{"origin":203177,"position":3},"title":"Patna High Court emphasizes on role of Welfare State; directs authorities to \u201crelease pension and death-cum-retiral benefits\u201d","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J. while hearing a civil writ petition filed by a widow for payment of family pension and death cum post retiral benefits, came down heavily upon the State for the prolonged delay in making payment and emphasized on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204975,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/11\/only-gratuity-but-not-leave-encashment-can-be-withheld-of-a-retired-employee-pending-investigation-ph-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":203177,"position":4},"title":"Only gratuity but not leave encashment can be withheld of a retired employee pending investigation: P&H High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 11, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shekher Dhawan, J., dealt with a writ petition for the release of retiral benefits i.e. leave encashment to the petitioner.\u00a0 Petitioner had filed the instant petition for the release of leave encashment as a retiral benefit. Facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":266532,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/06\/illicit-deduction-of-amount-from-the-retiral-dues\/","url_meta":{"origin":203177,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Illicit deduction of amount from the retiral dues; Directions issued to refund the amount","author":"Editor","date":"May 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J. allowed a writ petition which was filed assailing the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 1-8-2018 whereby the excess amount of Rs.81,239\/- has been sought to be recovered from the gratuity payable to him. Petitioner was aggrieved by the order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203177"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203177\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}