{"id":203154,"date":"2018-10-05T11:15:08","date_gmt":"2018-10-05T05:45:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203154"},"modified":"2018-10-06T11:27:19","modified_gmt":"2018-10-06T05:57:19","slug":"relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/","title":{"rendered":"Relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution not available if efficacious alternative remedy present"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Meghalaya High Court:<\/strong> This petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case were that an application was filed by the petitioner before the Trial Court seeking interim relief. An ex parte interim relief was granted directing status quo regarding subject matter to be maintained. Respondent submitted the existence of two title suits. It was submitted before Trial Court that preliminary decree was still operative not challenged by anyone and suit property was the same. Court observed that interim order cannot be extended beyond the date already mentioned by the court. Petitioner was aggrieved by the above order and thus filed petition before the High Court where petition\u2019s maintainability was challenged as the petitioner had two alternate remedies available i.e. application for modification of interim relief under O. 39 R. 4 CPC and the second to file an appeal under O. 43 CPC. Respondent relied on the case of <em>State Bank of Travancore<\/em> v. <em>Mathew K.C.<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/41oe54TD\">(2018) 3 SCC 85<\/a> where it was observed that relief under Articles 226\/227 of the Constitution of India is not available if an efficacious alternative remedy is available to any aggrieved person.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court was of the view that respondents have not yet filed objections before the court. After the respondent file their objection the trial court ought to hear both parties in few weeks and then decide the matter. The petition was thus dismissed. [Md. Saquib v. Md. Ilyas,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0QPNz8tF\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Megh 177<\/b><\/a>, order dated 28-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Meghalaya High Court: This petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ, under Article 227 of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31975,31619,31976,2769],"class_list":["post-203154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-alternative-remedy","tag-article-226-constitution-of-india","tag-ex-parte","tag-relief"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution not available if efficacious alternative remedy present | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution not available if efficacious alternative remedy present\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Meghalaya High Court: This petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ, under Article 227 of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-05T05:45:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-06T05:57:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/\",\"name\":\"Relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution not available if efficacious alternative remedy present | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-05T05:45:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-06T05:57:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution not available if efficacious alternative remedy present\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution not available if efficacious alternative remedy present | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution not available if efficacious alternative remedy present","og_description":"Meghalaya High Court: This petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ, under Article 227 of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-05T05:45:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-06T05:57:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/","name":"Relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution not available if efficacious alternative remedy present | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-05T05:45:08+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-06T05:57:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/relief-under-articles-226-and-227-of-the-constitution-not-available-if-efficacious-alternative-remedy-present\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Relief under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution not available if efficacious alternative remedy present"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":154074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/04\/karnataka-hc-declines-relief-article-226-light-alternate-remedy-available-s-115-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":203154,"position":0},"title":"Karnataka HC declines relief under Article 226 in light of alternate remedy available under S. 115 CPC","author":"Saba","date":"December 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution praying to quash the order passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, rejecting the application filed by the petitioner, a Single Judge Bench of BV Nagarathna, J. held that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":154224,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/exercise-of-establishing-facts-before-the-civil-courts-cannot-be-bypassed-by-invoking-writ-jurisdiction-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":203154,"position":1},"title":"Exercise of establishing facts before the civil courts cannot be bypassed by invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution","author":"Saba","date":"September 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While passing the order in a writ petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution, a Single Judge Bench of Vineet Kothari, J. dismissed the petition holding that the petitioner has not allowed the respondent Authorities to consider the case on merits and proceed further\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268478,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/16\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-not-obligatory-for-the-court-to-entertain-writ-petition-when-efficacious-alternative-remedy-is-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":203154,"position":2},"title":"MP HC \u2502 Not obligatory for the Court to entertain writ petition when efficacious alternative remedy is available","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sujoy Paul and Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ., disposed of a petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy of appeal. Petitioner had\u00a0 filed Writ Petition challenging impugned order which was an interlocutory order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":359274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/06\/supreme-court-reinstatement-of-rajasthan-pradhan-suspension\/","url_meta":{"origin":203154,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court deprecates State Inaction; Orders immediate restoration of suspended Rajasthan Pradhan","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the normal course, we would not have entertained the petition of this nature, but the petitioner is seeking implementation of a relief that he has already got by invoking a remedy under Article 226\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Reinstatement of Rajasthan Pradhan","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reinstatement-of-Rajasthan-Pradhan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reinstatement-of-Rajasthan-Pradhan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reinstatement-of-Rajasthan-Pradhan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reinstatement-of-Rajasthan-Pradhan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":190594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/19\/matters-requiring-extensive-fact-finding-cannot-adjudicated-art-226\/","url_meta":{"origin":203154,"position":4},"title":"Matters requiring extensive fact finding cannot be adjudicated under Art. 226","author":"Saba","date":"February 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari, J., decided a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, wherein it declined to grant any relief as prayed for by the petitioner holding that it was not a fit case to be adjudicated under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":179164,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/29\/award-passed-lok-adalat-can-challenged-limited-grounds-initiating-proceedings-art-226-227-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":203154,"position":5},"title":"Award passed by Lok Adalat can only be challenged on limited grounds by initiating proceedings under Art 226 or 227 of Constitution","author":"Saba","date":"December 29, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Judicature at Madras: The Bench of\u00a0V. M. Velumani, J. recently addressed a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution which challenged the decree order of the Small Causes Court, dated 28\/10\/2010. The petitioner, also the claimant, had filed a case in the Motor Accident\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203154"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203154\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}