{"id":203018,"date":"2018-10-03T14:00:39","date_gmt":"2018-10-03T08:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=203018"},"modified":"2018-10-12T12:55:22","modified_gmt":"2018-10-12T07:25:22","slug":"one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018One cannot suffer for fault of advocate\u2019; order of Magistrate quashing the complaint set aside"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Calcutta High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Md. Mumtaz Khan, J. allowed a revision petition against the order of the Magistrate whereby the petitioner\u2019s complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The complaint filed by the petitioner was quashed in the exercise of power under Section 204(4) CrPC for want of requisites. Additionally, the Magistrate had also passed an order of acquittal of the accused under Section 256. The petitioner was asked to submit the requisites necessary to issue summons against the accused. However, after giving repeated opportunities, there was no submission of requisites by the petitioner. Even the show cause notice was not responded to. Resultantly, the Magistrate passed the above-mentioned order. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred the instant revision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court perused the record and was of the view that the order impugned was not sustainable. It was noted that one of the requisites to be submitted was the processing fee. Section 204(4) provides for dismissal of the complaint for non-payment of process fee. Moreover, the matter was at the stage of issue of summons. The accused had neither appeared in the case nor it was at the stage of evidence. Thus, the Magistrate was in error for exercising power under Section 256 and recording acquittal. Furthermore, as far as an order under Section 204(4) was concerned, the petitioner had shown sufficient cause for not being able to submit the requisites. The reason was shown to be fraud played by its advocate for which complaint had been registered with the police and also a complaint was given to the Bar Council. A copy of both the complaints were produced before the Court. The Court was of the view that <em>one could not be allowed to suffer for fault of the advocate<\/em>. In the opinion of the Court, the order impugned required interference. Therefore, in light of the above, the order passed by the Magistrate under Sections 204(4) and 256 CrPC was quashed. The complaint was restored to the file. The revision was allowed accordingly. [ACME Paints and Resin (P) Ltd. v. Deb Paints (P) Ltd.,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/53dS2a5z\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Cal 7054<\/b><\/a>, dated 28-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Md. Mumtaz Khan, J. allowed a revision petition against the order of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":52131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[4561,31934,31935],"class_list":["post-203018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acquittal","tag-fault-of-advocate","tag-order-of-magistrate"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u2018One cannot suffer for fault of advocate\u2019; order of Magistrate quashing the complaint set aside | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018One cannot suffer for fault of advocate\u2019; order of Magistrate quashing the complaint set aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Md. Mumtaz Khan, J. allowed a revision petition against the order of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-03T08:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-12T07:25:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018One cannot suffer for fault of advocate\u2019; order of Magistrate quashing the complaint set aside | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-03T08:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-12T07:25:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018One cannot suffer for fault of advocate\u2019; order of Magistrate quashing the complaint set aside\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018One cannot suffer for fault of advocate\u2019; order of Magistrate quashing the complaint set aside | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018One cannot suffer for fault of advocate\u2019; order of Magistrate quashing the complaint set aside","og_description":"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Md. Mumtaz Khan, J. allowed a revision petition against the order of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-03T08:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-12T07:25:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/","name":"\u2018One cannot suffer for fault of advocate\u2019; order of Magistrate quashing the complaint set aside | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2018-10-03T08:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-12T07:25:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/one-cannot-suffer-for-fault-of-advocate-order-of-magistrate-quashing-the-complaint-set-aside\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018One cannot suffer for fault of advocate\u2019; order of Magistrate quashing the complaint set aside"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":244861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/","url_meta":{"origin":203018,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming &#8216;member of RSS&#8217; quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Suresh Kumar Kait, J., quashed a complaint about defamation filed by a lawyer against Business Standard. It was held that the complainant had no locus to file the complainant. What do the petitioners want? Petitioner sought the quashing of Order as well as Complaint Case titled: Lohitaksha\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245665,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/16\/audi-alteram-partem\/","url_meta":{"origin":203018,"position":1},"title":"[Audi Alteram Partem] Raj HC | Whether complainant\u2019s revision against dismissal of his complaint, can be decided without giving an opportunity of hearing to the accused petitioner? Court explains\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"March 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., disposed of a petition which was filed against the order passed by the Additional Session Judge, Women Atrocity Cases No.1, Kota. The counsel for the petitioner, Mr Sudhir Jain submitted that the complainant had challenged the order passed by the Learned ACJM, Kota\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258949,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/23\/magistrate-required-to-exercise-judicious-discretion-before-ordering-interim-compensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":203018,"position":2},"title":"Magistrate required to exercise judicious discretion before ordering interim compensation, S. 143-A NI Act not mandatory: Kar HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Rajendra Badamikar, J.,\u00a0reversed an order of the Magistrate which had directed the petitioner accused to deposit 20% of the cheque amount before the court. The High Court said that Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is not a mandatory provision. Factual Matrix The respondent herein\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/07\/sikk-hc-criminal-proceedings-initiated-under-ss-186-290-and-353-of-ipc-found-non-heinous-and-quashed-as-parties-entered-into-a-compromise\/","url_meta":{"origin":203018,"position":3},"title":"Sikk HC | Criminal proceedings initiated under Ss. 186, 290 and 353 of IPC found non-heinous and quashed, as parties entered into a compromise","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: Arup Kumar Goswami, CJ. quashed a criminal case under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In the present case, the respondent filed an FIR as the petitioner insulted the respondent, where there was a possibility of her getting hit. A case was registered under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215124,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/29\/chh-hc-order-taking-cognizance-of-offence-under-ss-420-and-120-b-ipc-against-advocate-for-authenticating-an-agreement-set-aside-in-light-of-s-131-of-notaries-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":203018,"position":4},"title":"Chh HC | Order taking cognizance of offence under Ss. 420 and 120-B IPC against Advocate for authenticating an agreement set aside in light of S. 13(1) of Notaries Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Sanjay K. Agarwal, J. allowed a petition filed by an advocate against the order of Judicial Magistrate (First Class) whereby cognizance was taken against him, along with other accused persons, for the offences punishable under Section 420 read with Section 120-B IPC. The petitioner was working as a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/23\/cal-hc-rejection-of-complaint-under-s-1563-crpc-by-magistrate-without-taking-cognizance-under-s-1901a-is-an-error-in-law-correct-approach-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":203018,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | Rejection of complaint under S. 156(3) CrPC by Magistrate without taking cognizance under S. 190(1)(a) is an error in law; correct approach explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Madhumati Mitra, J., allowed a criminal revision application filed against the order of the Magistrate whereby he had rejected the petitioner's prayer under Section 156(3) CrPC to send the petition of complaint to the officer-in-charge of the police station for treating the same as first information report. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203018"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203018\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}