{"id":202920,"date":"2018-10-01T11:08:57","date_gmt":"2018-10-01T05:38:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=202920"},"modified":"2018-10-04T15:22:48","modified_gmt":"2018-10-04T09:52:48","slug":"application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/","title":{"rendered":"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge bench comprising of M.K. Hanjura, J. while dealing with an application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition, dismissed both the application as well as the petition on grounds of inordinate delay in filing the same.<\/p>\n

Brief facts of the case are that in a writ petition filed by the petitioners, the Hon\u2019ble Court made an observation with regards to engagement of 130 casual workers on the basis of an order dated 02-04-2012 and directed that the engagement of the petitioners also be considered. The instant review petition was filed for recalling the aforesaid order stating that since there was no order vide which 130 casual workers had been employed, therefore the question of providing similar treatment to the petitioners did not arise. The reason given for delay in filing the review petition was that as soon as the aforesaid anomaly came to the notice of petitioners, they sought advice from a senior counsel which led to a delay in filing the review petition and that the said delay was not intentional.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0 High court observed that the law of limitation has to be enforced with all its rigor and vigor. Section 5 of the J&K Limitation Act Samvat, 1995 stipulates that the applicant has to satisfy the court of sufficient cause for not preferring the application\/ appeal\/ review within the time period as prescribed in the statute.<\/p>\n

Relying on the judgment of the Apex Court in Union of India v Nripen Sarma, <\/em>(2013) 4 SCC 57<\/a>\u00a0and Esha Bhattacharjee v. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy<\/em>,\u00a0(2013) 12 SCC 649 <\/a>the court noted that there was a reckless delay of 1230 days in filing the review petition and the sequence of the events which prompted the petitioners to file the review petition after a long delay of more than three years had not been accounted. Further, the court also relied on the judgment in Northern India<\/em> Caterers v Lt. Governor Delhi, <\/em>(1980) 2 SCC 167\u00a0<\/a>and observed that the scope of a review petition is limited to dealing with an error apparent on the face of the record and it cannot be used as a forum to re-argue the matter.<\/p>\n

On the aforesaid holdings, the court dismissed the petitioner\u2019s application for condonation of delay and also dismissed the review petition. [Mohammad Akbar Lone v DG, Prasar Bharati,2018 SCC OnLine J&K 664<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 28-09-2018]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of M.K. Hanjura, J. while dealing with an application for condonation of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2552,31920,4841],"class_list":["post-202920","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Condonation_of_delay","tag-jk-limitation-act-samvat-1995","tag-review-petition"],"yoast_head":"\nApplication seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of M.K. Hanjura, J. while dealing with an application for condonation of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-01T05:38:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-04T09:52:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/\",\"name\":\"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-01T05:38:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-04T09:52:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay","og_description":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of M.K. Hanjura, J. while dealing with an application for condonation of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-01T05:38:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-04T09:52:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/","name":"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-01T05:38:57+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-04T09:52:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215189,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/30\/j-application-for-condonation-of-delay-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":202920,"position":0},"title":"J&K HC | Unending period for launching remedy may lead to an unending uncertainty and consequential anarchy; application for condonation of delay rejected \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. rejected an application for seeking condonation of delay in the filing review petition. The facts of the case were that the petitioner filed an RTI application against the order wherein respondent have denied filling up of 36 vacancies under the ST\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207127,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/21\/appeal-filed-along-with-application-for-condonation-of-delay-when-dismissed-is-a-decree-within-section-22-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":202920,"position":1},"title":"Appeal filed along with application for condonation of delay when dismissed is a decree within Section 2(2) CPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., dismissed a writ petition challenging the order passed by the Additional District Judge, whereby the Appellate Court had dismissed the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay.\u00a0 The petitioners were aggrieved by this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206979,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/18\/discretionary-order-for-condonation-of-delay-passed-by-quasi-judicial-powers-cannot-be-interfered-with-in-writ-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":202920,"position":2},"title":"Discretionary order for condonation of delay passed by quasi-judicial powers cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Kumar, J., dismissed the current writ petition invoked for quashing the order of the district judge whereby the appeal of the petitioner was held as non maintainable and the order passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner regarding the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219005,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/02\/pat-hc-limitation-to-file-revision-application-denied-condonation-on-grounds-of-unexplained-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":202920,"position":3},"title":"Pat HC | Limitation to file revision application denied condonation on grounds of unexplained delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. disposed of the revision petition saying that the Court did not find any ground to condone such delay of over eleven years as there was absolutely no explanation that came from the petitioners. The petitioners approached the Court under Sections 397 and 401 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/06\/time-consumed-in-party-bona-fidely-litigating-cause-before-wrong-forum-is-to-be-considered-for-condonation-of-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":202920,"position":4},"title":"Time consumed in party bona fidely litigating cause before wrong forum is to be considered for condonation of delay \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.M. Dhavale, J. allowed an appeal filed against the order of District Judge whereby appellant\u2019s application for condonation of delay in filing first appeal was dismissed. There was a partition between the appellant and his two sisters. Originally, in 2004, after\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276127,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/25\/madras-high-court-shiv-shanker-baba-limitation-sexual-harassment-self-styled-sexual-abuse-godman-fir-condonation-of-delay-ipc-crpc-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":202920,"position":5},"title":"Absence of application to condone delay barred by limitation; Madras High Court quashes FIR against self-styled Godman Shiva Sankar Baba","author":"Editor","date":"October 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madras High Court: In a criminal original petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for quashing of First Information Report (FIR) registered under Section 354 of the Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC\u2019) and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202920","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202920"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202920\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202920"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202920"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202920"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}