{"id":202576,"date":"2018-09-29T17:00:16","date_gmt":"2018-09-29T11:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=202576"},"modified":"2018-10-03T10:18:29","modified_gmt":"2018-10-03T04:48:29","slug":"sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Sufficient opportunity for cross-examination must be granted to defence; trial court directed to re-summon witnesses: Delhi HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby the two of the prosecution witnesses were discharged only after recording of their testimony and without cross-examination.<\/p>\n

The trial court had recorded the testimony of the said witnesses and thereafter discharged them. The petitioner submitted that sufficient opportunity was not granted for the defence counsel to be ready for cross-examination of those witnesses. Aggrieved by such discharging of the witnesses, the present petition was filed by the accused-petitioner.<\/p>\n

The High Court perused the orders passed by the trial court. They, inter alia<\/em>, showed that the matter was adjourned from time to time for examination and cross-examination and the same was being deferred either for want of FSL report or securing the presence of witness. It was seen that one of the witnesses was discharged after recording the testimony without cross-examination as on that date only a proxy counsel was present who sought passover or an adjournment which was not granted. Similarly, the opportunity for cross-examination of the other witness was not sufficient as the FSL report was produced by the Investigating Officer for the first time on the same date the witness was examined and discharged. In such facts and circumstances, the Court was satisfied that the petitioner was not afforded a sufficient opportunity to be ready for cross-examination. Thus, the petition was allowed and the trial court was directed to re-summon the witnesses concerned. [Deepak Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi),2018 SCC OnLine Del 11517<\/b><\/a>, dated 25-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[9121,3556,31909],"class_list":["post-202576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cross-examination","tag-defence","tag-re-summon"],"yoast_head":"\nSufficient opportunity for cross-examination must be granted to defence; trial court directed to re-summon witnesses: Delhi HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sufficient opportunity for cross-examination must be granted to defence; trial court directed to re-summon witnesses: Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-29T11:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-03T04:48:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Sufficient opportunity for cross-examination must be granted to defence; trial court directed to re-summon witnesses: Delhi HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-29T11:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-03T04:48:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sufficient opportunity for cross-examination must be granted to defence; trial court directed to re-summon witnesses: Delhi HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sufficient opportunity for cross-examination must be granted to defence; trial court directed to re-summon witnesses: Delhi HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sufficient opportunity for cross-examination must be granted to defence; trial court directed to re-summon witnesses: Delhi HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-29T11:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-03T04:48:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/","name":"Sufficient opportunity for cross-examination must be granted to defence; trial court directed to re-summon witnesses: Delhi HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-09-29T11:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-03T04:48:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/sufficient-opportunity-for-cross-examination-must-be-granted-to-defence-trial-court-directed-to-re-summon-witnesses-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sufficient opportunity for cross-examination must be granted to defence; trial court directed to re-summon witnesses: Delhi HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299056,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/delhi-hc-dismisses-petition-to-recall-seven-year-old-sexual-assault-victim-to-be-cross-examined\/","url_meta":{"origin":202576,"position":0},"title":"POCSO| Delhi High Court dismisses petition to recall 7-year-old victim for cross examination; says repeated opportunities do not necessarily indicate fair trial","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile balancing the right of the accused to a fair trial and upholding the intent of the legislation, the courts are duty bound to remain sensitive to the plight of the seven-year-old sexual assault victim.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":67861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/09\/courts-must-strike-balance-between-protecting-rights-of-accused-and-preventing-harassment-of-victims-and-witnesses-due-to-prolonged-trials\/","url_meta":{"origin":202576,"position":1},"title":"Courts must strike balance between protecting rights of accused and preventing harassment of victims and witnesses due to prolonged trials","author":"Saba","date":"September 9, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Setting aside the decision of the Court of Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, refusing the petitioner accused the right to recall an important witness for cross-examination, the Bench of Dr. P. Devadass, J., allowed the petitioners to recall the witness for cross-examination cautioning that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260790,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/fair-trial-is-the-hallmark-of-criminal-procedure\/","url_meta":{"origin":202576,"position":2},"title":"Fair trial is the hallmark of criminal procedure, it entails not only rights of victims but also interest of accused: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Manoj Kumar Ohri, J., while discussing the scope of Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with regard to recalling and cross-examining the witness expressed that, It is the duty of every Court to ensure that fair and proper opportunities are granted to the accused for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/31\/factors-guiding-exercise-of-discretion-by-judge-under-section-231-2-crpc-practice-guidelines-for-trial-court-in-conducting-criminal-trial-stated-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":202576,"position":3},"title":"Factors guiding exercise of discretion by Judge under Section 231 (2) CrPC, “practice guidelines” for trial court in conducting criminal trial stated: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 31, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. while allowing an appeal filed against the judgment of Kerala High Court, stated the factors guiding exercise of discretion by the Judges under Section 231 (2) CrPC and the practice guidelines to be followed by the trial courts while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273175,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/06\/tripura-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-code-of-criminal-procedure-re-summoning-witness-accused-examination-in-chief-irreparable-lacuna-justice-hostile-witness-legal-research-legal\/","url_meta":{"origin":202576,"position":4},"title":"Tripura High Court | Section 311 CrPC cannot be used to fill up the lacuna but re-examination can be done to meet the ends of justice","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Tripura High Court: In a case relating to a revision petition filed by the State, challenging the order of the Sessions Judge allowing the petition filed by the accused for re-examination of witnesses under Section 311 Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) at the stage of examination of accused\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":53371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/28\/advocates-required-to-maintain-a-balance-between-duty-towards-their-client-and-duty-towards-the-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":202576,"position":5},"title":"Advocates required to maintain a balance between duty towards their client and duty towards the Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 28, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: While dismissing the revision petition filed against the order of the Addition Sessions Judge, the Court said that it is duty of the lawyer to make a balance between client\u2019s interest and administration of justice The Petitioner had preferred an application under Section 311 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}