{"id":202558,"date":"2018-09-29T13:40:31","date_gmt":"2018-09-29T08:10:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=202558"},"modified":"2018-12-27T17:02:00","modified_gmt":"2018-12-27T11:32:00","slug":"the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge need not write extensively if “context and record” make clear that Judge had “a reasoned basis” for reducing petitioner’s sentence: SCOTUS"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of The United States: <\/strong>A Nine-Judge Bench comprising of CJ Roberts,\u00a0 Breyer, Thomas, Ginsburg and Alito, JJ., and for the dissenting opinion Kennedy, Sotomayor and Kagan, JJ. and Gorsuch, J., dismissed a writ of certiorari whereby it was held that when a Judge had a reasoned basis for exercising his own legal decision-making authority he need not give a detailed explanation for the same.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was found guilty of possessing methamphetamine along with the intent to distribute the same, for which the Judge after having reviewed the Guidelines ranging to be 135 to 168 months imposed a sentence at the bottom of the range. Further, the Sentencing Commission lowered the relevant range from 108 to 135 months. The petitioner sought a sentence reduction under \u00a73582(c)(2) to reduce the sentence to the bottom of the new range, but the Judge reduced petitioner’s sentence to 114 months instead of taking into account the motion and the relevant guidelines. Hence, this petition was filed expressing disdain to know the reasoned basis behind not considering petitioner\u2019s plea and imposing a “disproportionate” sentence reduction (sentence reduced to a different point in the amended Guidelines range than the previously selected in the original Guidelines range).<\/p>\n

It was contended by the respondent that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines require a sentencing Judge to first identify the recommended Guidelines sentencing range based on certain offender and offense characteristics and then it was up to his discretion to either choose a penalty within that Guidelines range, or by departing from the Guidelines and select a sentence outside the range. However he must state in open court the reasons for the same but quoting the case of Rita <\/em>v. United States,<\/em>2007 SCC OnLine US SC 62<\/b><\/a>, it was clearly held that how detailed the explanation must be has been left to the Judge\u2019s own professional judgment. Also, the statute governing sentence-modification motions was devoid of any express provisions directing a sentencing Judge to state his reasons for imposing a particular sentence and hence the conduct of the respondent here was sufficient. In this case, the proportionality of the sentence declared was in question but apparently it being a technical issue proving the sentence to be \u2018right\u2019 was difficult as the sentence was in the middle of the range. With respect to the form order, it was pointed out that it demanded severe penalty as a “significant quantity\u201d of methamphetamine was involved and going by the nature of the drug it yet again corroborates the reasons for the said sentencing.<\/p>\n

The petitioner argued that the Judge should have explained more relying on the presumption that the respondent would choose a point within the new lower Guidelines range that was “proportional” to the point previously chosen in the older higher Guidelines range. It was answered by the respondents that neither they were aware of any law nor this was a convincing reason to demand the same. Citing the case of Dillon <\/em>v. United States<\/em>,\u00a02010 SCC OnLine US SC 74<\/b><\/a> it was held that, “the court has no duty” to provide an “on-the-record explanation” of its reasons when the explanation fell within the scope of lawful professional judgment that the law confers upon the sentencing Judge.\u201d Additionally providing a more detailed statement of reasons often serves “a salutary purpose” separate and apart from facilitating appellate review.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, given the simplicity of this <\/em>case, the Judge’s awareness of the arguments along with consideration of the relevant sentencing factors, and the intuitive reason for the sentence above the very bottom of the new range, the Judge’s explanation (minimal as it was) fell within the scope of the lawful professional judgment that the law confers upon the sentencing Judge.<\/p>\n

Hence the appeal was affirmed.<\/p>\n

Dissenting opinion: <\/strong><\/p>\n

It was submitted by the Judge that a District Court’s reasoning shall be surmised from its terse and largely uninformative order. He asserts that \u201cIf the form were expanded to include just a few more categories covering the factors most often bearing on a trial court’s sentencing determination, the objections petitioner raises likely would be met.\u201d Thus it was insufficient to allow for meaningful appellate review.[Adaucto Chavez-Meza v. United States,\u00a02018 SCC OnLine US SC 81<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 18-06-2018]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of The United States: A Nine-Judge Bench comprising of CJ Roberts,\u00a0 Breyer, Thomas, Ginsburg and Alito, JJ., and for the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":32691,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts"],"yoast_head":"\nJudge need not write extensively if "context and record" make clear that Judge had "a reasoned basis" for reducing petitioner's sentence: SCOTUS | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Judge need not write extensively if "context and record" make clear that Judge had "a reasoned basis" for reducing petitioner's sentence: SCOTUS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of The United States: A Nine-Judge Bench comprising of CJ Roberts,\u00a0 Breyer, Thomas, Ginsburg and Alito, JJ., and for the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-29T08:10:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-27T11:32:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/\",\"name\":\"Judge need not write extensively if \\\"context and record\\\" make clear that Judge had \\\"a reasoned basis\\\" for reducing petitioner's sentence: SCOTUS | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-29T08:10:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-27T11:32:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Supreme Court of The United States\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Judge need not write extensively if “context and record” make clear that Judge had “a reasoned basis” for reducing petitioner’s sentence: SCOTUS\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Judge need not write extensively if \"context and record\" make clear that Judge had \"a reasoned basis\" for reducing petitioner's sentence: SCOTUS | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Judge need not write extensively if \"context and record\" make clear that Judge had \"a reasoned basis\" for reducing petitioner's sentence: SCOTUS","og_description":"Supreme Court of The United States: A Nine-Judge Bench comprising of CJ Roberts,\u00a0 Breyer, Thomas, Ginsburg and Alito, JJ., and for the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-29T08:10:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-27T11:32:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/","name":"Judge need not write extensively if \"context and record\" make clear that Judge had \"a reasoned basis\" for reducing petitioner's sentence: SCOTUS | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","datePublished":"2018-09-29T08:10:31+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-27T11:32:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Supreme Court of The United States"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/the-judge-need-not-write-extensively-if-the-context-and-the-record-make-clear-that-the-judge-had-a-reasoned-basis-for-reducing-the-petitioners-sentence-united-states-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Judge need not write extensively if “context and record” make clear that Judge had “a reasoned basis” for reducing petitioner’s sentence: SCOTUS"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":147771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/04\/reproducing-few-passages-from-the-trial-court-order-without-analysis-cannot-be-a-reasoned-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":202558,"position":0},"title":"Reproducing few passages from the trial Court order without analysis cannot be a \u2018reasoned order\u2019","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 4, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Discouraging the practice of the appellate courts of reproducing the passages of the lower court\u2019s order without proper analysis, the bench of Dipak Misra and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ said that quoting passages from the trial court judgment and thereafter penning few lines and expressing the view that there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/08\/eastern-caribbean-supreme-court-unveils-sentencing-guidelines-for-public-consultation\/","url_meta":{"origin":202558,"position":1},"title":"Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court unveils –Sentencing Guidelines for Public Consultation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The rule of law can only be maintained and strengthened by ensuring public confidence in the transparency and consistency of judicial approach. One of the areas of greatest public interest and comment, sometimes uninformed, is sentencing. The Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago, in the case of\u00a0Aguillera v The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "International Courts"","block_context":{"text":"International Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/international-courts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/ECSS.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/ECSS.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/ECSS.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/ECSS.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/ECSS.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236199,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/24\/know-thy-judge-justice-indira-banerjee\/","url_meta":{"origin":202558,"position":2},"title":"Know Thy Judge| Justice Indira Banerjee","author":"Editor","date":"September 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Sucheta Sarkar, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In "Know thy Judge"","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/indira-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/indira-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/indira-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/indira-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/indira-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244933,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/03\/suspended-sentences\/","url_meta":{"origin":202558,"position":3},"title":"Is there any legal basis in Antigua and Barbuda for imposition of suspended sentences? Read in regards to imposition of sentence for sexual intercourse offence with a girl below 14 years","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, In the Court of Appeal: The Bench of Davidson Kelvin Baptiste (Justice of Appeal), Mde. Gertel Thom (Justice of Appeal) and Paul Webster (Justice of Appeal [Ag.]) ruled that there is no jurisdiction in Antigua and Barbuda to impose suspended sentences in criminal cases. Factual Matrix\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Eastern-Caribbean-Court-of-Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Eastern-Caribbean-Court-of-Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Eastern-Caribbean-Court-of-Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Eastern-Caribbean-Court-of-Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Eastern-Caribbean-Court-of-Supreme-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358603,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/supreme-court-stays-rajasthan-high-court-adverse-remarks-pocso-judge\/","url_meta":{"origin":202558,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court stays Rajasthan High Court\u2019s directions containing adverse remarks against POCSO Judge","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court has directed a copy of the judgment passed by the trial judge to be sent to the Rajasthan Judicial Academy for the purpose of giving training on judgment writing.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court stay on Rajasthan HC adverse remarks","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Supreme-Court-stay-on-Rajasthan-HC-adverse-remarks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Supreme-Court-stay-on-Rajasthan-HC-adverse-remarks.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Supreme-Court-stay-on-Rajasthan-HC-adverse-remarks.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Supreme-Court-stay-on-Rajasthan-HC-adverse-remarks.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333593,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/22\/supreme-court-issues-guidelines-for-high-court-judges-regarding-time-limit-for-pronouncement-of-judgments\/","url_meta":{"origin":202558,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court issues guidelines for High Court Judges regarding time limit for pronouncement of judgments","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court emphasised that Judges must be mindful of the impact of their actions on society at large. Dealing with lakhs of litigation is no mean task, but at the same time, Judges must realize that instances do emerge leaving absolutely no margin for error.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SC Guidelines time limit pronouncement of judgments","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/SC-Guidelines-time-limit-pronouncement-of-judgments.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/SC-Guidelines-time-limit-pronouncement-of-judgments.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/SC-Guidelines-time-limit-pronouncement-of-judgments.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/SC-Guidelines-time-limit-pronouncement-of-judgments.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202558\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}