{"id":202554,"date":"2018-09-29T12:19:38","date_gmt":"2018-09-29T06:49:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=202554"},"modified":"2018-09-29T12:19:38","modified_gmt":"2018-09-29T06:49:38","slug":"shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/","title":{"rendered":"Shareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity"},"content":{"rendered":"

Constitutional Court of South Africa:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mogoeng, CJ. Dlodlo, Goliath, Petse, AJ, Froneman, Jafta, Khampepe, Madlanga, and Theron, JJ., unanimously granted the applicants rescission in terms of the Uniform Rules of Court and granted leave to intervene to applicants in the trial.<\/p>\n

This application was filed for leave to appeal against an order of Supreme Court Appeal where a refusal of rescission and dismissal of an application for leave to intervene by the High Court of South Africa was upheld. The issue before the Court was whether rescission and leave to intervene should have been granted.<\/p>\n

Facts of the case are that a group of individuals acquired a company to use the same as a vehicle for commercial opportunities for the benefit of black people. Applicants were shareholders of this company. The company was converted into a public company in order to open up the shareholding to more than 50 persons. It was renamed NC Housing Services and Development Co. Ltd. Due to failure to file annual company returns ROC removed the name of the company from companies register. Later company wanted to sell its major asset for which they applied for re-registration and were subsequently re-registered. A dispute arose between the applicants and the second and third respondents, regarding the proportion of shares owned by the various shareholders.<\/p>\n

The respondent filed an application in High Court against the company where the matter was referred to Trial. High Court held that the shareholders could not have been a party in trial as they could not have personally fought the case as they were representative directors. Supreme Court of Appeal held that although the applicants had been participating in the proceedings both as directors and as shareholders, the resolution passed by them barred them from participating in the litigation due to their failure to have set aside the above resolution.<\/p>\n

Therefore, this Constitutional Court held that when an individual shareholder is presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d in court proceedings, he becomes party in the litigation in his personal capacity. Orders of the Supreme Court of Appeal and High Court of South Africa were set aside. Court granted rescission in terms of the Uniform Rules of Court and leave to appeal to intervene in the trial. [Morudi v. NC Housing Services and Development Co. Ltd. , (2018) ZACC 32, dated 25-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Constitutional Court of South Africa: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mogoeng, CJ. Dlodlo, Goliath, Petse, AJ, Froneman, Jafta, Khampepe, Madlanga, and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":167554,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[3795,31906,12871,31907],"class_list":["post-202554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-litigation","tag-personal-capacity","tag-shareholder","tag-uniform-rules"],"yoast_head":"\nShareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Constitutional Court of South Africa: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mogoeng, CJ. Dlodlo, Goliath, Petse, AJ, Froneman, Jafta, Khampepe, Madlanga, and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-29T06:49:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/\",\"name\":\"Shareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-29T06:49:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity","og_description":"Constitutional Court of South Africa: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mogoeng, CJ. Dlodlo, Goliath, Petse, AJ, Froneman, Jafta, Khampepe, Madlanga, and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-29T06:49:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/","name":"Shareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg","datePublished":"2018-09-29T06:49:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":202554,"position":0},"title":"Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Eswatini High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of T.M. Mlangeni, J., granted an application for rescission of default judgment. This matter was with regard to an application for rescission of default judgment that was given against the applicant. The respondent submitted that the application for rescission was defective on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/10\/ccj-whether-an-application-seeking-to-challenge-the-maintainability-of-substantive-appeal-is-itself-maintainable-or-not-court-determines\/","url_meta":{"origin":202554,"position":1},"title":"CCJ | Whether an application seeking to challenge the maintainability of \u2018substantive appeal\u2019 is itself maintainable or not? Court determines","author":"Editor","date":"November 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ): A Full Bench of J Wit, M. Rajnauth-Lee and P. Jamadar JJ. dismissed the application for special leave to appeal on merits. \u00a0The briefly stated facts are that the Respondent i.e Blairmont Rice Investments Inc. agreed to purchase from the Applicants i.e. Kayman Sankar Investments\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/CCJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/CCJ.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/CCJ.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/CCJ.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/CCJ.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":167524,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/07\/biowatch-principle-applied-constitutional-matters-except-vexatious-litigations\/","url_meta":{"origin":202554,"position":2},"title":"Biowatch principle to be applied in all constitutional matters except vexatious litigations","author":"Saba","date":"November 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitutional Court of South Africa: A Constitutional Bench comprising of Nkabinde, ADCJ, Cameron, Froneman, Jafta, Khampepe, Madlanga, Mhlantla, Zondo, JJ along with Mojapelo and Pretorius AJJ, refused to grant leave to appeal against the order of the Supreme Court of Appeal. The applicant was an aspiring doctor seeking admission to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/12\/sat-dismiss-appeal-not-maintainable-shareholder-right-to-continue-litigation-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":202554,"position":3},"title":"SAT Mumbai dismisses appeal under S. 15T SEBI Act for not having filed by an ‘aggrieved person’","author":"Arunima","date":"July 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"SAT Mumbai observed that it is not open to a shareholder to complain about the scheme of arrangement before the SEBI or to the Stock Exchange nor is it open to the shareholder to make a representation and \/or file an appeal before this Tribunal under Section 15T of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"securities appellate tribunal, mumbai","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/securities-appellate-tribunal-mumbai.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300216,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/28\/writ-court-should-not-intervene-permit-activities-like-puja-amid-property-title-dispute-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":202554,"position":4},"title":"Writ Court should not intervene to permit activities like Puja amid property title dispute: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court suggested the respondent committee to approach the Civil Court through an appropriate interlocutory application for permissions related to puja.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277923,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/23\/constitutional-court-of-south-africa-defence-of-slapp-well-accommodated-in-doctrine-of-abuse-of-process-to-ensure-courts-own-protection\/","url_meta":{"origin":202554,"position":5},"title":"Constitutional Court of South Africa | Defence of SLAPP well accommodated in Doctrine of Abuse of Process to ensure Court’s own protection","author":"Editor","date":"November 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Constitutional Court of South Africa | A bench comprising of Kollapen, Madlanga, Majiedt*, Mathopo, Mhlantla, Theron, Tshiqi, JJ., Mlambo and Unterhalter AJ., unanimously held that Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAAP) are on a rise and that the common law doctrine of abuse of process can accommodate such\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202554"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202554\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/167554"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}