{"id":202387,"date":"2018-09-28T10:43:20","date_gmt":"2018-09-28T05:13:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=202387"},"modified":"2018-09-28T10:44:56","modified_gmt":"2018-09-28T05:14:56","slug":"sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/","title":{"rendered":"Sabarimala Temple Verdict| Constitution Bench to pronounce its verdict on the \u201cban on entry of women\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court: <\/strong>The 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra, Rohinton Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra JJ., is likely to pronounce its decision on the \u201cban on entry of women aged between 10 to 50 years\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple in Kerala. The decision was reserved by the Bench on 01-08-2018 after \u00a08- day long proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">During the hearings, the Bench had the following opinion in regard to the issue:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>CJI Dipak Misra: <\/strong><strong>Where a man can enter, even a woman can go. What applies to a man, applies to a woman.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Nariman J.,<\/strong>\u00a0The only reason is the paternalistic notion that during 41 days women cannot keep the Vratam, no other temple prohibits women.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Chandrachud J.:\u00a0<\/strong><em style=\"font-weight: inherit;\">Tagging religious belief with menarche is absurd. Exclusion on the basis of age of a woman is irrelevant, tagging age with menarche is even more so<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Chandrachud J.,<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cIn a patriarchal society, women are made to go through a certain social conditioning from birth, on how to behave, what to say, what to do, etc.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The following questions\/ issues are expected to be answered in today\u2019s decision:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether the exclusionary practice which is based upon a biological factor exclusive to the female gender amounts to \u201cdiscrimination\u201d and thereby violates the very core of Articles 14, 15 and 17 and not protected by \u2018morality\u2019 as used in Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution?<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether the practice of excluding such women constitutes an \u201cessential religious practice\u201d under Article 25 and whether a religious institution can 30 assert a claim in that regard under the umbrella of right to manage its own affairs in the matters of religion?<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether Ayyappa Temple has a denominational character and, if so, is it permissible on the part of a \u2018religious denomination\u2019 managed by a statutory board and financed under Article 290-A of the Constitution of India out of Consolidated Fund of Kerala and Tamil Nadu can indulge in such practices violating constitutional principles\/ morality embedded in Articles 14, 15(3), 39(a) and 51-A (e)?<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether Rule 3 of Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules permits \u2018religious denomination\u2019 to ban entry of women between the age of 10 to 50 years? And if so, would it not play foul of Articles 14 and 15(3) of the Constitution by restricting entry of women on the ground of sex?<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether Rule 3(b) of Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorization of Entry) Rules, 1965 is ultra vires the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Act, 1965 and, if treated to be intra vires, whether it will be violative of the provisions of Part III of the Constitution?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The Judgment of the Constitution Bench is awaited.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra, Rohinton Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra JJ., <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Sabarimala Temple Verdict| Constitution Bench to pronounce its verdict on the \u201cban on entry of women\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sabarimala Temple Verdict| Constitution Bench to pronounce its verdict on the \u201cban on entry of women\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra, Rohinton Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra JJ.,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-28T05:13:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-28T05:14:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/\",\"name\":\"Sabarimala Temple Verdict| Constitution Bench to pronounce its verdict on the \u201cban on entry of women\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-28T05:13:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-28T05:14:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sabarimala Temple Verdict| Constitution Bench to pronounce its verdict on the \u201cban on entry of women\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sabarimala Temple Verdict| Constitution Bench to pronounce its verdict on the \u201cban on entry of women\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sabarimala Temple Verdict| Constitution Bench to pronounce its verdict on the \u201cban on entry of women\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple","og_description":"Supreme Court: The 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra, Rohinton Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra JJ.,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-28T05:13:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-28T05:14:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/","name":"Sabarimala Temple Verdict| Constitution Bench to pronounce its verdict on the \u201cban on entry of women\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-09-28T05:13:20+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-28T05:14:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-verdict-constitution-bench-to-pronounce-its-verdict-on-the-ban-on-entry-of-women-into-the-sabarimala-temple\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sabarimala Temple Verdict| Constitution Bench to pronounce its verdict on the \u201cban on entry of women\u201d into the Sabarimala Temple"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":205029,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/12\/sabarimala-review-petitions-to-be-heard-tomorrow-against-the-supreme-courts-verdict\/","url_meta":{"origin":202387,"position":0},"title":"Sabarimala| Review Petitions to be heard tomorrow against the Supreme Court\u2019s verdict","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of CJ Ranjan Gogoi and R.F Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y. Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, JJ. will hear the review petitions in the Sabarimala Temple case against the decision allowing women\u2019s entry in Sabarimala Temple tomorrow\u00a0i.e. 13-11-2018 in chambers. Background: A 5-Judge Constitution Bench, by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/sabarimala-temple-patriarchal-notion-cant-trump-equality-in-devotion-entry-of-women-allowed-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":202387,"position":1},"title":"Sabarimala Temple| Patriarchal notion can&#8217;t trump equality in devotion; Entry of women allowed: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra, Rohinton Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra JJ., by a 4:1 majority, allowed the entry of women in Sabarimala Temple, Kerala. CJ Dipak Misra: Women no way inferior to men. On one hand, women are worshipped\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/18\/sabarimala-temple-ban-on-women-entry-where-a-man-can-enter-even-a-women-can-go-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":202387,"position":2},"title":"Sabarimala Temple| Ban on women entry: Where a man can enter, even a women can go: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra, Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra JJ., commenced the hearing on the well-known \u2018Sabarimala Temple case' yesterday right after reserving the judgment in the case dealing with the constitutionality of Section 377 IPC. The issue in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225204,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/sabarimala-can-reference-be-made-in-a-review-petition9-judge-bench-to-decide-along-with-other-issues\/","url_meta":{"origin":202387,"position":3},"title":"Sabarimala| Can reference be made in a review petition?9-judge bench to decide along with other issues","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A nine-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court will hear on February 6 argument on the issue whether the court can refer questions of law to a larger bench on a review petition after renowned jurist and senior advocate Fali Nariman objected to the manner in which the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/06\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-reserves-order-on-whether-a-reference-can-be-made-in-a-review-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":202387,"position":4},"title":"Sabarimala| 9-judge bench reserves order on whether a reference can be made in a review petition","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 9-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ and R Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan, L Nageswara Rao, M M Shantanagoudar, S A Nazeer, R Subhash Reddy, B R Gavai and Surya Kant, JJ, hearing the Sabarimala reference has reserved it's order on the legal issue of whether the Supreme Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198977,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/day-4-sabarimala-temple-if-a-person-has-a-belief-it-is-not-for-a-secular-judge-to-sit-in-judgment-of-that-belief-am-singhvi\/","url_meta":{"origin":202387,"position":5},"title":"[Day-4]\u00a0Sabarimala Temple| If a person has a belief, it is not for a secular Judge to sit in judgment of that belief: AM Singhvi","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, Dr DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra JJ., resumed with the fourth day of the proceedings on the \u2018Sabarimala Temple\u2019 hearing. AM Singhvi resumed with his arguments for the day in support of Travancore Devaswom\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202387\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}