{"id":202366,"date":"2018-09-28T10:01:51","date_gmt":"2018-09-28T04:31:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=202366"},"modified":"2018-10-01T10:21:51","modified_gmt":"2018-10-01T04:51:51","slug":"explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/","title":{"rendered":"Explaining use of mark by reverse deduction trivialize trademark rights; injunction granted against use of BURGER KING"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Pratibha M. Singh, J. granted injunction in favour of the plaintiff restraining the defendant from using the mark BURGER KING.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff, Burger King Corporation, was the registered owner of the mark BURGER KING and its logo. It started its first restaurant in 1954 with the same name in Miami, Florida. At present, it owns some 13,000 restaurants internationally. The present suit was filed alleging that the defendants were operating a restaurant by the name BURGER KING RESTAURANT\u00a0 in Varanasi. They had also applied for registration of the same. Registration was also sought by the defendants for the mark BURGER EMPEROR. The plaintiff issued a cease and desist notice in November 2011 which was not complied with. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff sought the permanent injunction against the defendants.<\/p>\n

The High Court was of the view that it had to consider balance of probabilities in respect of adoption and use of the said mark and logo. The Court found an uncanny resemblance between the two logos. The plaintiff showed the registration of the same dating back to the year 2000. The defendants were not able to show any use thereof prior to that date. Thus, the use of by the defendants of an imitative logo was held to be a violation of plaintiff\u2019s rights. In so far as the use of trademark BURGER KING was concerned, the defendants said that it was derived from the initials of their family members. It was observed that the explanation for the coinage of the mark makes it clear that the defendants were trying to adopt a process of reverse deduction to explain the use of the mark BURGER KING. Such an explanation, if adopted, would lead to trivializing trademark rights. In such facts and circumstances, the Court was of the view that the relief of injunction already granted in the year 2014 should be made absolute. Order was passed accordingly. However, the defendants were free to use the mark BURGER EMPEROR. The matter was disposed of in the terms above. [Burger King Corpn. v. Ranjan Gupta,2018 SCC OnLine Del 11484<\/b><\/a>, dated 24-09-2018]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Pratibha M. Singh, J. granted injunction in favour of the plaintiff restraining the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31886,2943,31885],"class_list":["post-202366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-burger-king","tag-injunction","tag-trademark-rights"],"yoast_head":"\nExplaining use of mark by reverse deduction trivialize trademark rights; injunction granted against use of BURGER KING | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Explaining use of mark by reverse deduction trivialize trademark rights; injunction granted against use of BURGER KING\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Pratibha M. Singh, J. granted injunction in favour of the plaintiff restraining the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-28T04:31:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-01T04:51:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/\",\"name\":\"Explaining use of mark by reverse deduction trivialize trademark rights; injunction granted against use of BURGER KING | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-28T04:31:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-01T04:51:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Explaining use of mark by reverse deduction trivialize trademark rights; injunction granted against use of BURGER KING\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Explaining use of mark by reverse deduction trivialize trademark rights; injunction granted against use of BURGER KING | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Explaining use of mark by reverse deduction trivialize trademark rights; injunction granted against use of BURGER KING","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Pratibha M. Singh, J. granted injunction in favour of the plaintiff restraining the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-28T04:31:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-01T04:51:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/","name":"Explaining use of mark by reverse deduction trivialize trademark rights; injunction granted against use of BURGER KING | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-09-28T04:31:51+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-01T04:51:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/28\/explaining-use-of-mark-by-reverse-deduction-trivialize-trademark-rights-injunction-granted-against-use-of-burger-king\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Explaining use of mark by reverse deduction trivialize trademark rights; injunction granted against use of BURGER KING"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":286635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/09\/delhi-high-court-rejects-plea-regarding-cancellation-of-registered-trademark-of-burger-king-for-insufficient-material-placed-on-record-legal-research-news-awareness-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":202366,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court holds plea regarding ‘invalidity of registrations’ granted in favour of the trademark BURGER KING as untenable","author":"Arunima","date":"March 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that no issue regarding the validity of the registrations of trademarks of the plaintiff is liable to be framed in the facts and circumstances of the present case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/dhc-declares-burger-king-as-a-well-known-trade-mark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":202366,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court declares \u2018BURGER KING\u2019 as a well-known trade mark","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDefendants are free to use trade mark \u201cBURGER EMPEROR\u201d\/and other \u201cBURGER EMPEROR\u201d\/ formative marks and logo\/device .\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302046,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/21\/delhi-hc-restrains-fraudulent-websites-from-using-burger-king-mark-under-garb-of-issuing-franchise-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":202366,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains fraudulent websites from using \u2018Burger King\u2019 mark under the garb of issuing franchise","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court recognises the need to take stringent action as the application reveals that there is misuse of the domain names and the two logos - Crescent Logo Design and Hamburger Refresh Design Logo.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290595,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/26\/delhi-high-court-stays-use-of-burger-king-mark-in-a-rectification-petition-filed-by-burger-king-co-llc-against-virendra-kumar-gupta-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":202366,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court stays use of \u2018BURGER KING\u2019 mark in a rectification petition filed by Burger King Co. LLC against a family restaurant","author":"Simranjeet","date":"April 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a rectification petition filed by Burger King Co. LLC against a family restaurant, the Delhi High Court stayed the operation of the mark \u2018BURGER KING\u2019 in Class 43 as it was identical to the well-known mark \u2018BURGER KING\u2019 and was likely to deceive public and create confusion.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324200,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/12\/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-to-dominos-selling-pizzas-burger-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":202366,"position":4},"title":"[Domino\u2019s v. Donito\u2019s] Delhi HC grants interim injunction to Dominos IP Holder for its mark Domino\u2019s in relation to pizzas and burgers","author":"Editor","date":"June 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court was satisfied that plaintiff 1 \u2014 Domino's IP Holder LLC had made out a prima facie case for grant of an ex-parte ad interim injunction, as they were likely to suffer irreparable harm in case the injunction was not granted.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"interim injunction to Dominos","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/interim-injunction-to-Dominos.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/interim-injunction-to-Dominos.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/interim-injunction-to-Dominos.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/interim-injunction-to-Dominos.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352720,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/legal-roundup-intellectual-property-right-roundup-june-2025-copyright-infringement-trade-mark-infringement-scc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":202366,"position":5},"title":"INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ROUNDUP: A quick recap of the latest Intellectual Property Rights rulings from June 2025.","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Covering all the important intellectual property rights cases across various High Courts and the Supreme Court, this roundup provides a quick summary of cases, latest legal updates in intellectual property rights and links to other roundups.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights Roundup June 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202366"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202366\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}