{"id":202243,"date":"2018-09-26T11:20:47","date_gmt":"2018-09-26T05:50:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=202243"},"modified":"2018-09-26T11:23:55","modified_gmt":"2018-09-26T05:53:55","slug":"breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Breaking| M. Nagaraj judgment on \u201cReservations in Promotions\u201d does not require reconsideration: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court: <\/strong>The 5-judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and Kurian Joseph, R.F. Nariman, S.K. Kaul and Indu Malhotra, JJ., held the decision in <em>M. Nagaraj v. Union of India,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/k0w8d9u0\">(2006) 8 SCC 212<\/a>, bad in law to the extent it requires quantifiable data for reservation in promotions because it is contrary to the decision in <em>Indira Sawhney v. Union of India<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/lZQIy0uP\">1992 Supp (3) SCC 217<\/a>. Also, Nagraj judgment does not require any reconsideration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Nagraj judgment raised the question of reservation in promotions for members of the SC\/ST communities and Apex Court had laid down the criteria regarding the same in <em>M. Nagaraj v. Union of India,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/k0w8d9u0\">(2006) 8 SCC 212<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Supreme Court held that the conditions laid down in the Nagaraj judgment need to be struck down as the condition of proving backwardness violates the 9-Judge Bench decision in <em>Indira Sawhney v. Union of India<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/lZQIy0uP\">1992 Supp (3) SCC 217<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Source: https:\/\/twitter.com\/TheLeaflet_in]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The 5-judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and Kurian Joseph, R.F. Nariman, S.K. Kaul and Indu Malhotra, JJ., <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[31880,31879,31279,14301],"class_list":["post-202243","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news","tag-backwardness","tag-m-nagaraj","tag-promotions","tag-reservations"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Breaking| M. Nagaraj judgment on \u201cReservations in Promotions\u201d does not require reconsideration: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Breaking| M. Nagaraj judgment on \u201cReservations in Promotions\u201d does not require reconsideration: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The 5-judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and Kurian Joseph, R.F. Nariman, S.K. Kaul and Indu Malhotra, JJ.,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-26T05:50:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-26T05:53:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Breaking| M. Nagaraj judgment on \u201cReservations in Promotions\u201d does not require reconsideration: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-26T05:50:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-26T05:53:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Breaking| M. Nagaraj judgment on \u201cReservations in Promotions\u201d does not require reconsideration: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Breaking| M. Nagaraj judgment on \u201cReservations in Promotions\u201d does not require reconsideration: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Breaking| M. Nagaraj judgment on \u201cReservations in Promotions\u201d does not require reconsideration: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court: The 5-judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and Kurian Joseph, R.F. Nariman, S.K. Kaul and Indu Malhotra, JJ.,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-26T05:50:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-26T05:53:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/","name":"Breaking| M. Nagaraj judgment on \u201cReservations in Promotions\u201d does not require reconsideration: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-09-26T05:50:47+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-26T05:53:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/26\/breaking-m-nagaraj-judgment-on-reservations-in-promotions-does-not-require-reconsideration-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Breaking| M. Nagaraj judgment on \u201cReservations in Promotions\u201d does not require reconsideration: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":202339,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/27\/applying-creamy-layer-principle-to-sc-st-not-invalid-collection-of-quantifiable-data-to-show-backwardness-not-allowed-nagaraj-case-not-to-be-reconsidered-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":202243,"position":0},"title":"Applying creamy layer principle to SC\/ST not invalid; collection of quantifiable data to show backwardness not allowed; Nagaraj case not to be reconsidered: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0The 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and Kurian Joseph, R.F. Nariman, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Indu Malhotra, JJ., disposed of a batch of petitions holding that the judgment in\u00a0M. Nagaraj v. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 212does not need to be referred to a 7-Judge\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260858,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/31\/reservation-in-promotion-the-6-issues-settled-by-supreme-court-on-collection-of-quantifiable-data-showing-inadequacy-of-representation\/","url_meta":{"origin":202243,"position":1},"title":"Reservation in promotion: The 6 issues settled by Supreme Court on collection of quantifiable data on inadequacy of representation\u00a0\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao*, Sanjiv Khanna and BR Gavai has answered following 6 crucial questions in relation to quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation in promotional posts: 1)What is the yardstick by which, according to M. Nagaraj v. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 212,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Reservation-in-promotion-The-6-issues-settled-by-Supreme-Court-on-collection-of-quantifiable-data-on-inadequacy-of-representation.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Reservation-in-promotion-The-6-issues-settled-by-Supreme-Court-on-collection-of-quantifiable-data-on-inadequacy-of-representation.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Reservation-in-promotion-The-6-issues-settled-by-Supreme-Court-on-collection-of-quantifiable-data-on-inadequacy-of-representation.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Reservation-in-promotion-The-6-issues-settled-by-Supreme-Court-on-collection-of-quantifiable-data-on-inadequacy-of-representation.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Reservation-in-promotion-The-6-issues-settled-by-Supreme-Court-on-collection-of-quantifiable-data-on-inadequacy-of-representation.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290049,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/19\/legal-analysis-of-recent-judgments-on-reservation-policies-in-india-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":202243,"position":2},"title":"Reservation Policies in India","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Reservation as a concept is very wide. Different people understand reservation to mean different things. One view of reservation as a generic concept is that reservation is an anti-poverty measure. There is a different view which says that reservation is merely providing a right of access and that it is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"judgments on reservation policies in india","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/judgments-on-reservation-policies-in-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/judgments-on-reservation-policies-in-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/judgments-on-reservation-policies-in-india.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/judgments-on-reservation-policies-in-india.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/06\/centre-given-green-signal-for-reservation-in-sc-st-employees-promotion-till-further-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":202243,"position":3},"title":"Centre given \u201cgreen\u201d signal for reservation in SC\/ST employees\u2019 promotion till further decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Vacation Bench comprising of Adarsh Kumar Goel and Ashok Bhushan JJ., allowed the Centre to go ahead with the reservation in promotion for employees belonging to the cadre of SC\/ST in accordance to law. Centre had stated various submissions for explaining their concern on the whole process\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":45601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/03\/rules-providing-for-reservation-in-promotions-for-scst-govt-employees-invalidated\/","url_meta":{"origin":202243,"position":4},"title":"Rules providing for reservation in promotions for SC\/ST govt employees, invalidated","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 3, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: While deciding a public interest litigation (PIL) questioning reservation in promotions, the Court quashed all\u00a0provisions granting promotions in the MP Public Service Promotion Rules, 2002, which introduced to reservation for SCs and STs in all posts at government departments. The state government in exercise of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/MPHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233146,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/30\/sc-dismisses-petition-seeking-review-of-the-2019-verdict-that-upheld-the-constitutionality-of-the-karnataka-reservation-act-2018\/","url_meta":{"origin":202243,"position":5},"title":"SC dismisses petition seeking review of the 2019 verdict that upheld the constitutionality of the Karnataka Reservation Act, 2018","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of UU Lalit and Dr. DY Chandrachud, JJ has refused to review it's verdict in B K Pavitra v Union of India, (2019) 16 SCC 129 wherein it had upheld the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority to Government Servants Promoted on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202243","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202243"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202243\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202243"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202243"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202243"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}