{"id":202223,"date":"2018-09-25T19:30:20","date_gmt":"2018-09-25T14:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=202223"},"modified":"2018-09-28T15:43:05","modified_gmt":"2018-09-28T10:13:05","slug":"law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/","title":{"rendered":"Law permitting parties to appear through attorneys doesn\u2019t bind Court to act mechanically, parties directed to appear in person"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. dismissed a petition impugning the order of Family Court whereby the petitioner and his wife were directed to appear in person before the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner and his wife were residents of USA. They applied for a decree of divorce under Section 13-B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 through their respective attorneys. The Family Court accepted the petition and allowed the first motion after interacting with the parties through video conferencing via <em>Skype<\/em>. The Family Court, in the order impugned, had observed that the parties were stated to be residing separately for 10 years, but were noticed to be living under the same roof. Furthermore, the wife did not seem very comfortable with the proceedings. The Family Court, thus directed the parties to be present in person for the second motion under 13-B(2), so that the Court could record satisfaction of their respective statements having been made independently and without undue influence. Aggrieved thereby, the husband filed the instant petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court perused the record and considered submissions made by the parties. It was noted that the relation between the parties and their respective power of attorneys was nowhere mentioned. Also, it was not a case where the parties could not make themselves present before the court. In fact, the petitioner was in Delhi at the time of filing of the petition. The Court observed that the consistent view of High Courts is that the statements through the h power of attorneys are permissible, but at the same time the Court should take necessary precautions and if it smells fraud being practiced, insist om personal appearance of the parties. Merely because the law permits the parties to act through attorney, even in matter of seeking dissolution of marriage, does not bind the Court to, even where it feels that personal presence of the parties is necessary and gives reasons, s therefore, act mechanically on the basis of petitions filed by attorneys and dissolve marriage after interacting with the attorneys of the parties only. The Court, in the facts of the case, held that the order impugned passed by the Family Court did not suffer from any infirmity and require no interference. The petition was, thus, dismissed. [Raja Banerji v. Alka Banerji,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9W6sQ06U\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Del 11397<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. dismissed a petition impugning the order of Family Court <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[27874,31875,31876],"class_list":["post-202223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appearance","tag-attorneys","tag-in-person"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Law permitting parties to appear through attorneys doesn\u2019t bind Court to act mechanically, parties directed to appear in person | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Law permitting parties to appear through attorneys doesn\u2019t bind Court to act mechanically, parties directed to appear in person\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. dismissed a petition impugning the order of Family Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-25T14:00:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-28T10:13:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/\",\"name\":\"Law permitting parties to appear through attorneys doesn\u2019t bind Court to act mechanically, parties directed to appear in person | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-25T14:00:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-28T10:13:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Law permitting parties to appear through attorneys doesn\u2019t bind Court to act mechanically, parties directed to appear in person\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Law permitting parties to appear through attorneys doesn\u2019t bind Court to act mechanically, parties directed to appear in person | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Law permitting parties to appear through attorneys doesn\u2019t bind Court to act mechanically, parties directed to appear in person","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. dismissed a petition impugning the order of Family Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-25T14:00:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-28T10:13:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/","name":"Law permitting parties to appear through attorneys doesn\u2019t bind Court to act mechanically, parties directed to appear in person | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-09-25T14:00:20+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-28T10:13:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/25\/law-permitting-parties-to-appear-through-attorneys-doesnt-bind-court-to-act-mechanically-parties-directed-to-appear-in-person\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Law permitting parties to appear through attorneys doesn\u2019t bind Court to act mechanically, parties directed to appear in person"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":185994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/06\/petitioner-allowed-appear-skype-family-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":202223,"position":0},"title":"Petitioner allowed to appear through \u2018Skype\u2019 in Family Court","author":"Saba","date":"February 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.S. Bopanna, J., decided a set of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, wherein the petitioner husband; residing abroad, was granted permission to appear in the Court through Skype. The matter related to a marriage dispute\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":312593,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/31\/practice-of-mentioning-caste-or-religion-of-litigants-should-be-ceased-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":202223,"position":1},"title":"\u201cPractice of mentioning caste or religion of litigants should be shunned and ceased\u201d: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe caste or religion of parties should not be mentioned in the memo of parties of a petition\/proceeding filed before the Court, irrespective of whether any such details have been furnished before the Courts below.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Mentioning of caste be ceased","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Mentioning-of-caste-be-ceased.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Mentioning-of-caste-be-ceased.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Mentioning-of-caste-be-ceased.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Mentioning-of-caste-be-ceased.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318470,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/27\/affidavit-of-disclosure-required-filed-by-wife-in-maintenance-cases-ex-parte-order-on-husband-jharkhand-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":202223,"position":2},"title":"Affidavit of Disclosure required to be filed by wife in maintenance cases, despite ex parte order on husband; Jharkhand High Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Even if the proceeding was ex-parte against the petitioner, still the required affidavit was to be filed by the wife so as to find out her assets\/liabilities\/source of income etc.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257951,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/01\/ker-hc-no-enquires-required-hc-lays-down-detailed-guidelines-for-speedy-disposal-of-petitions-seeking-judicial-endorsement-of-extrajudicial-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":202223,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | No enquires required; HC lays down detailed guidelines for speedy disposal of petitions seeking judicial endorsement of extrajudicial divorce","author":"Editor","date":"December 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A. Muhamed Mustaque and Kauser Edappagath, JJ., issued detailed guidelines for Family Courts for speedy disposal of petitions seeking the judicial endorsement of extra-judicial divorce. The unilateral extrajudicial divorce under Muslim Personal law is complete when either of the spouse pronounce\/declare talaq, talaq-e-tafweez\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":365556,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/03\/dhc-on-quashing-fir-based-on-unexecuted-settlement-agreement\/","url_meta":{"origin":202223,"position":4},"title":"&#8216;No implementation or execution of mutually settled agreement&#8217;: Delhi High Court refuses to quash FIR in matrimonial case","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"As per the settlement, the husband agreed to deposit a total sum of Rs. 30,00,000. However, the husband merely deposited cheques of certain amounts, which had not been released to the wife, due to husband\u2019s failure to appear in Family Court, resulting in dismissal of divorce petition.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"quashing FIR based on unexecuted settlement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/quashing-FIR-based-on-unexecuted-settlement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/quashing-FIR-based-on-unexecuted-settlement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/quashing-FIR-based-on-unexecuted-settlement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/quashing-FIR-based-on-unexecuted-settlement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321787,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/bhc-dismisses-plea-challenging-its-rules-for-presentation-conduct-of-proceedings-in-person-by-parties-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":202223,"position":5},"title":"Bombay High Court dismisses plea challenging its \u201cRules for Presentation and Conduct of Proceedings in Person by Parties\u201d","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The \u201cRules for Presentation and Conduct of Proceedings in Person by Parties\u201d does not apply if a party desires to appear in person when the proceedings are related to applications for temporary bail, parole, furlough, and habeas corpus.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202223\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}