{"id":201981,"date":"2018-09-19T12:30:47","date_gmt":"2018-09-19T07:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=201981"},"modified":"2018-09-19T11:29:32","modified_gmt":"2018-09-19T05:59:32","slug":"question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Question of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of criminal proceedings against the petitioners under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.<\/p>\n

The respondents had invoked the provision contained in Section 12 of the Act against one Lalit Mohan Joshi, husband of Respondent 1, since deceased<\/em>. The provision was also invoked against family members (present petitioners) of the husband. The petitioners approached the Court seeking quashing of the said proceedings on the grounds, inter alia<\/em>, that they were senior citizens, the allegations against them were small and bald, no case of domestic violence was properly brought out, intention of the respondent was to cause harassment and to gain wrongful possession of their property.<\/p>\n

The High Court, at the outset, observed that to say the least, the petition was wholly misconceived. Questions of facts cannot ordinarily, and in absence of evidence of unimpeachable character to the contrary, be properly inquired into or adjudicated upon in jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC. Reference in this connection was made to Rajiv Thapar <\/em>v. Madan Lal Kapoor<\/em>, (2013) 3 SCC 330<\/a>. Furthermore, it was observed that the fact of death of the husband cannot result in the criminal proceedings coming to an end. After all, allegations were also made against the petitioners who were related to the respondents by marriage or birth<\/em>. The Court held that the claim of the respondents for compensation for the injuries suffered as a result of alleged acts of domestic violence could not be brushed aside; it would need to inquired into and adjudicated upon in accordance with law. The petition was, thus, dismissed. [Vijay Laxmi v. Madhu Joshi, Crl. MC No. 4352 of 2015, dated 06-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30421,2641,31822,13021],"class_list":["post-201981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-death","tag-husband","tag-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005","tag-section-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nQuestion of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Question of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC for\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-19T07:00:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/\",\"name\":\"Question of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-19T07:00:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Question of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Question of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Question of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC for","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-19T07:00:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/","name":"Question of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-09-19T07:00:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/19\/question-of-facts-cannot-be-adjudicated-upon-under-section-482-crpc-death-of-husband-not-to-result-in-abatement-of-proceedings-under-dv-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Question of facts cannot be adjudicated upon under Section 482 CrPC; death of husband not to result in abatement of proceedings under DV Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":254911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/domestic-violence-act-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":201981,"position":0},"title":"Is it proper to invoke S. 482 CrPC for quashing Magistrate’s order in a proceeding under S. 12 r\/w S. 23 of Domestic Violence Act on the point of maintainability? Cal HC determines","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Bibek Chaudhari, J., considered the question as to whether Section 482 CrPC is applicable in relation to an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The following is a summary of High Court's determination on legal points that were before it for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/bombay-high-court-invoke-section-482-quash-dv-proceedings-domestic-violence-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":201981,"position":1},"title":"Distant relatives having no \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 roped to cause harassment and build pressure on husband; Bombay High Court invokes S. 482 CrPC to quash DV proceedings","author":"Arunima","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The power of the High Court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is of the widest amplitude, which can be exercised to secure ends of justice, unless barred by specific provision or by implication. Such power can be exercised to prevent unwanted harassment caused to a respondent with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":88341,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/28\/complaint-not-maintainable-under-domestic-violence-act-if-it-lacks-mentioning-of-specific-instances-of-domestic-violence\/","url_meta":{"origin":201981,"position":2},"title":"Complaint not maintainable under Domestic Violence Act if it lacks mentioning of specific instances of domestic violence","author":"Saba","date":"November 28, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Rajasthan: While deciding the validity and legality of the criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 CrPc, by the petitioners, the Bench comprising of P.K.Lohra, J., while exercising its power under Section 482 Cr PC, held that the criminal complaint filed against the petitioner, under Sections 498-A,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":337219,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/13\/kerala-hc-quashes-dv-case-mother-in-law-against-daughter-in-laws-parents-no-domestic-relationship\/","url_meta":{"origin":201981,"position":3},"title":"Kerala High Court quashes domestic violence case filed by mother-in-law against parents of daughter-in-law for lack of domestic relationship","author":"Editor","date":"December 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the proceedings under the DV Act are found to be an abuse of process of Court, in order to secure the ends of justice and to save the parties being put into a frivolous litigation, the High Court must exercise its power under Section 482 of CrPC or under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/14\/domestic-violence-act-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":201981,"position":4},"title":"Proceedings under Domestic Violence Act, whether criminal or civil, will challenge to them be maintainable under Art. 227 of Constitution? Madras HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G.R. Swaminathan, J., held that irrespective of whether the proceedings under Central Act 43 of 2005 are of civil or criminal nature, the power under Article 227 of the Constitution would always lie to quash the proceedings if a case is really made out. Instant petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":233038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":201981,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | “No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act”: Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 held that, legislature in its wisdom has provided for Appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against all \"orders\" and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201981\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}