{"id":201653,"date":"2018-09-11T15:00:06","date_gmt":"2018-09-11T09:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=201653"},"modified":"2018-09-12T12:06:31","modified_gmt":"2018-09-12T06:36:31","slug":"mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Mere apprehension as to future medical complications cannot regard a candidate as unfit for present employment: Hyderabad High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Hyderabad High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar and M. Ganga Rao, JJ., dismissed a writ petition against denying candidature on the ground of developing medical conditions in the future.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appointment of the respondent for Work Assistant at Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC) was rejected by the petitioner on the grounds that he was medically unfit in view of his morbid obesity, uncontrolled hypertension and sleep disorder as opined by the Medical Committee.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The matter went up to the Central Administrative Tribunal where the order of cancellation was rejected by stating that that a candidate could not be declared unfit for a particular post merely on the ground that he suffered from a disease or disorder without a clear finding that he could not perform the duties and responsibilities attached to that particular post and also the mere apprehension that he may develop complications in future cannot be accepted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The order was challenged, following which the Court stated that the nature of the work was not so onerous or strenuous that only a person in the pink of health could do it plus no specific standard of physical fitness other than visual acuity was required for appointment of a non-technical staff. Consequently, the fundamental level of the respondent was not impaired by his hypertension or being overweight.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court concluded by saying that the authorities seem to have gone on a witch-hunt to come up with new diseases\/disorders so as to show the respondent the door and hence being utterly devoid of merit the writ petition was dismissed and the employment of the respondent was allowed as per the orders of the tribunal. [Union of India v. Nenavath Suresh,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/zcn3WJDr\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Hyd 294<\/b><\/a>, order dated 31-08-2018]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hyderabad High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar and M. Ganga Rao, JJ., dismissed a writ petition against denying candidature <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31753,28744,31779],"class_list":["post-201653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-candidature","tag-employment","tag-medical-conditions"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Mere apprehension as to future medical complications cannot regard a candidate as unfit for present employment: Hyderabad High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mere apprehension as to future medical complications cannot regard a candidate as unfit for present employment: Hyderabad High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Hyderabad High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar and M. Ganga Rao, JJ., dismissed a writ petition against denying candidature\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-11T09:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-12T06:36:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/AP-TELANGANA-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Mere apprehension as to future medical complications cannot regard a candidate as unfit for present employment: Hyderabad High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-11T09:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-12T06:36:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mere apprehension as to future medical complications cannot regard a candidate as unfit for present employment: Hyderabad High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mere apprehension as to future medical complications cannot regard a candidate as unfit for present employment: Hyderabad High Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mere apprehension as to future medical complications cannot regard a candidate as unfit for present employment: Hyderabad High Court","og_description":"Hyderabad High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar and M. Ganga Rao, JJ., dismissed a writ petition against denying candidature","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-11T09:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-12T06:36:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/AP-TELANGANA-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/","name":"Mere apprehension as to future medical complications cannot regard a candidate as unfit for present employment: Hyderabad High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-09-11T09:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-12T06:36:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/11\/mere-apprehension-as-to-future-medical-complications-cannot-regard-a-candidate-as-unfit-for-present-employment-hyderabad-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mere apprehension as to future medical complications cannot regard a candidate as unfit for present employment: Hyderabad High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":261872,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/17\/unless-the-acquittal-in-criminal-trial-is-honourable-clean-the-employer-has-enough-discretion-to-find-a-candidate-to-be-unfit-for-employment\/","url_meta":{"origin":201653,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | Unless the acquittal in criminal trial is honourable\/clean, the employer has enough discretion to find a candidate to be unfit for employment","author":"Editor","date":"February 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sheel Nagu and Sunita Yadav, JJ. while hearing a petition under Article 227 against order the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench., dismissed the petition. The petition was moved to CAT against the order cancelling candidature of the petitioner to the post of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203775,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/16\/acquittal-due-to-hostile-prosecutrix-doesnt-make-applicants-character-unfit-for-purpose-of-employment-matter-directed-to-be-reconsidered-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":201653,"position":1},"title":"Acquittal due to hostile prosecutrix doesn&#8217;t make applicant\u2019s character unfit for purpose of employment; matter directed to be reconsidered: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cJudicial service is very different from other services and the yardstick of suitability that may apply to other services, may not be the same for judicial service.\u201d Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench comprising of Kurian Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Navin Sinha, JJ., while allowing an appeal filed by a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":303505,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/04\/sainik-school-denies-admission-to-student-for-being-medically-unfit-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":201653,"position":2},"title":"Sainik School denies admission to student for being medically unfit; Uttaranchal High Court dismisses petition seeking admission","author":"Editor","date":"October 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA candidate should be medically fit in the manner that he\/she must be in a good physical and mental health, free from any disease\/syndrome\/disability likely to interfere with the efficient performance, etc., but there should also be no evidence of any congenital deformities.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"uttaranchal high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/uttaranchal-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/14\/candidate-declared-unfit-for-the-post-of-district-judge-due-to-pendency-of-criminal-case-can-they-claim-reconsideration-after-acquittal-read-what-sc-says\/","url_meta":{"origin":201653,"position":3},"title":"Candidate declared unfit for the post of District Judge due to pendency of criminal case. Can they claim reconsideration after acquittal? Read what SC says","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where a man was tried for and later acquitted from charges under Section 498A\/406\/34 IPC, the bench of Ashok Bhushan and MR Shah, JJ held that the apprehension that a stigma shall continue with the name of the appellant is misconceived, as stigma, if any,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":277122,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/10\/impugnedorder-wherein-petitioner-declared-unfit-for-post-constable-held-denial-appointment-unjustified-directed-respondents-issue-letterofaappointment-within-8weeks-punjabandharyanahighcourt-legal-new\/","url_meta":{"origin":201653,"position":4},"title":"Denial of Appointment held unjustified; Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court directs State to issue a letter of appointment within a period of 8 weeks","author":"Editor","date":"November 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Punjab and Haryana High Court: While allowing the instant petition, preferred by the petitioner against the impugned order dated 19-01-2017 wherein the petitioner was declared unfit for the post of Constable, Jaishree Thakur, J., held that denial of appointment is unjustified and directed the respondents to issue letter\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196962,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/15\/people-suffering-from-varicose-veins-unfit-to-join-the-army\/","url_meta":{"origin":201653,"position":5},"title":"People suffering from varicose veins unfit to join the Army","author":"Saba","date":"June 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0\u00a0A Division Bench comprising of Hima Kohli and Pratibha Rani, JJ. has held that a person who suffers from varicose veins, and was operated on at an advanced stage of the ailment, may be medically fit for civilian jobs; however, he cannot be considered for military or paramilitary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201653\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}