{"id":201598,"date":"2018-09-10T13:30:45","date_gmt":"2018-09-10T08:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=201598"},"modified":"2018-09-12T15:46:44","modified_gmt":"2018-09-12T10:16:44","slug":"matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/","title":{"rendered":"Matching of DNA is a clinching evidence and sufficient by itself to prove crime; appeal of rape convict rejected"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and V. Kameswar Rao, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Sections 325, 363 and 376(2) IPC along with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.<\/p>\n

The appellant was convicted for raping an 8 years old minor girl. He was alleged to have kidnapped her while she was playing with her younger sisters and thereafter commit rape and aggravated penetrative sexual assault upon her. The appellant was tried and convicted by the trial court for the offences mentioned above. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant filed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n

The High Court perused the record and was of the view that the order impugned does not call for interference. The evidence against the appellant proved his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. As far as the testimony of the victim was concerned, the Court referred to Dattu Ramrao Sakhare<\/em> v. State of Maharashtra<\/em><\/strong>, (1997) 5 SCC 341<\/a> and observed that the only precaution which the Court has to bear in mind while assessing the evidence of a child witness is that the witness must be a reliable one. In the present case, the Court was of the view that victim\u2019s testimony inspired confidence as to its credibility. Furthermore, the evidence of matching of appellant\u2019s DNA with the semen stains found on victim\u2019s pyjama<\/em> was more than a clinching evidence to prove appellant\u2019s guilt. In such circumstances, the Court affirmed the order impugned and dismissed the appeal. [Gopi Nisha Mallah v. State (NCT of Delhi),2018 SCC OnLine Del 11021<\/b><\/a>, dated 04-09-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and V. Kameswar Rao, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2637,31774],"class_list":["post-201598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-DNA","tag-rape-convict"],"yoast_head":"\nMatching of DNA is a clinching evidence and sufficient by itself to prove crime; appeal of rape convict rejected | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Matching of DNA is a clinching evidence and sufficient by itself to prove crime; appeal of rape convict rejected\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and V. Kameswar Rao, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-10T08:00:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-12T10:16:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/\",\"name\":\"Matching of DNA is a clinching evidence and sufficient by itself to prove crime; appeal of rape convict rejected | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-10T08:00:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-12T10:16:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Matching of DNA is a clinching evidence and sufficient by itself to prove crime; appeal of rape convict rejected\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Matching of DNA is a clinching evidence and sufficient by itself to prove crime; appeal of rape convict rejected | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Matching of DNA is a clinching evidence and sufficient by itself to prove crime; appeal of rape convict rejected","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and V. Kameswar Rao, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-10T08:00:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-12T10:16:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/","name":"Matching of DNA is a clinching evidence and sufficient by itself to prove crime; appeal of rape convict rejected | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-09-10T08:00:45+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-12T10:16:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/10\/matching-of-dna-is-a-clinching-evidence-and-sufficient-by-itself-to-prove-crime-appeal-of-rape-convict-rejected\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Matching of DNA is a clinching evidence and sufficient by itself to prove crime; appeal of rape convict rejected"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":202130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/24\/refusal-of-father-to-accept-marriage-does-not-amount-to-false-pretext-by-accused-rape-convict-acquitted-in-light-of-consent\/","url_meta":{"origin":201598,"position":0},"title":"Refusal of father to accept marriage does not amount to false pretext by accused; rape convict acquitted in light of \u2018consent\u2019 \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajasekhar Mantha, J. allowed an appeal filed by the appellant against of the order of the trial court whereby he was convicted under Section 376 IPC. The prosecution case was that the appellant had committed rape on the prosecutrix on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/30\/utt-hc-fouler-the-crime-higher-the-proof-court-allows-appeal-of-convict-under-ss-376-511-penal-code-1860-and-s-6-of-pocso-act-acquits-him-in-absence-of-credible-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":201598,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | \u2019Fouler the crime higher the proof\u2019; Court allows appeal of convict under Ss. 376 & 511 Penal Code and S. 6 of POCSO Act, acquits him in absence of credible evidence","author":"Editor","date":"September 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Narayan Singh Dhanik, J., allowed a Criminal Jail Appeal which was filed from the jail against the judgment whereby the appellant had been convicted for the offences under Section 376\/511 Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200685,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/parameters-for-assessing-quantum-of-punishment-for-rape-upon-child-reiterated-sentence-of-imprisonment-for-life-modified\/","url_meta":{"origin":201598,"position":2},"title":"Parameters for assessing quantum of punishment for rape upon child reiterated; sentence of imprisonment for life modified","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi and I.S. Mehta, JJ. modified the sentence of the appellant convicted under Sections 363, 376(2)(i) and 506 IPC along with Sections 5(m) and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The appellant was accused of convicting rape\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204023,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/22\/improvisation-of-story-by-witnesses-raises-serious-doubt-on-prosecution-case-conviction-of-rape-modified-sentence-reduced-for-young-first-time-offender-tripura-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":201598,"position":3},"title":"Improvisation of story by witnesses raises serious doubt on prosecution case; conviction of rape modified; sentence reduced for young first time offender: Tripura HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Arindam Lodh, J. partly allowed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under the provision\u00a0of IPC and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The appellant was neighbor of the complainant -\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/17\/mp-hc-death-penalty-of-a-man-accused-of-rape-and-murder-of-his-6-year-old-daughter-commuted-to-life-imprisonment-after-balancing-aggravating-and-mitigating-circumstances\/","url_meta":{"origin":201598,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | Death penalty of man accused of rape and murder of daughter reduced to life imprisonment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of J.K. Maheshwari and Anjuli Palo, JJ. partly allowed a criminal petition filed by a person accused of rape and murder of his minor daughter, and commuted his death penalty to life imprisonment. In the instant case, the prosecutrix (since deceased) aged six\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196524,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/30\/sentence-of-a-rape-convict-reduced-in-light-of-mitigating-circumstances\/","url_meta":{"origin":201598,"position":5},"title":"Sentence of a \u2018rape convict\u2019 reduced in light of mitigating circumstances","author":"Saba","date":"May 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The sentence of the appellant who was convicted for kidnapping and rape, was reduced to the period already undergone by him, by a Single Judge Bench comprising of K.K. Sonawane, J. The appellant was accused of forcibly taking away the prosecutrix (victim), who was a minor at\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201598\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}