{"id":201416,"date":"2018-09-06T15:30:09","date_gmt":"2018-09-06T10:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=201416"},"modified":"2018-09-12T12:16:52","modified_gmt":"2018-09-12T06:46:52","slug":"order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., addressed an issue where petitioner was transferred and aggrieved by the same filed this writ petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case are that petitioner at the time of filing this writ petition was a Dy. Manager in the respondent Bank and was transferred to Katni from Jabalpur. Petitioner aggrieved by the transfer order filed representation on the ground that he was about to get retired in few months. Petitioner contended that he had been getting frequently transferred which is against transfer policy. Respondents did not consider his representation and a notice was issued to petitioner under Rule 40(3) of the State Bank of India Officers Service Rules, 1992 giving him 3 days to report on duty at Katni. Petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court wherein he was ordered to file a representation on the above notice and an application for stay on the orders of respondents. The representation was rejected by the impugned order after which petitioner filed this instant writ petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was contended by the petitioner that respondents did not consider the transfer policy in full and the fact that petitioner is the Vice President of SBI SC\/ST Employees Welfare Association thus exempted from transfer. Petitioner contended that impugned order did not contain the grounds mentioned by the petitioner in representation. After perusing the matter High Court was of the view that the respondents have not considered the grounds stated by the petitioner and thus impugned order was a non-speaking order. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside. [Chetram Choudhary v. State Bank of India,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5vp8dWSk\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine MP 508<\/b><\/a>, dated 31-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., addressed an issue where petitioner was transferred and aggrieved <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":172684,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31759,31760,25034],"class_list":["post-201416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-order-of-transfer","tag-sc-st-employee","tag-transfer-policy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., addressed an issue where petitioner was transferred and aggrieved\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-06T10:00:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-12T06:46:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-06T10:00:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-12T06:46:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., addressed an issue where petitioner was transferred and aggrieved","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-06T10:00:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-12T06:46:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/","name":"Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","datePublished":"2018-09-06T10:00:09+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-12T06:46:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":201278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":201416,"position":0},"title":"No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Petitioner had filed this petition before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., against the order of respondents where petitioner\u2019s representation with regard to his transfer was rejected. Facts of the case are that petitioner was working on the post of Patwari and was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216853,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/15\/raj-hc-an-employee-cannot-be-transferred-in-the-last-year-of-his-service-if-the-department-does-not-have-an-obvious-cause-for-the-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":201416,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | An employee cannot be transferred in the last year of his service, if the department does not have an obvious cause for the same","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Alok Sharma, J. allowed a civil writ petition filed by a person against his transfer order. As a result of which, another order was passed regarding its transfer, quashing the previous transfer order. \u00a0In the instant case, the petitioner was transferred to the post of RTO Alwar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238773,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/07\/hp-hc-service-law-state-cannot-make-arbitrary-orders-of-transfer-under-the-garb-of-public-interest-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":201416,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | [Service Law] State cannot make arbitrary orders of transfer under the garb of public interest; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"November 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J., while allowing the present petition, held the impugned transfer order to be arbitrary and inconsistent with the Service\/Appointment Rules. \u00a0Brief Facts The facts of the case are enumerated herewith; That in the year 1986, the petitioner on his appointment as Clerk, was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/transfer-orders\/","url_meta":{"origin":201416,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Courts should not interfere with transfer orders made in public interest; Petition dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"February 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J., dismissed a writ petition which was filed in the matter of transfer of public servants. The petitioner was appointed as Mukhya Sewika\/Supervisor in the Department of Women Empowerment and Child Development; she had joined her services on 05-04-2013. A complaint was sent to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":84031,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/08\/there-is-no-fundamental-or-civil-right-to-have-your-spouse-transferred-near-your-residence\/","url_meta":{"origin":201416,"position":4},"title":"There is no fundamental or civil right to have your spouse transferred near your residence","author":"Saba","date":"November 8, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While noting that there can be no claim of violation of a person\u2019s fundamental or\u00a0civil rights just because his wife is not being transferred near his residence, the Single Bench of\u00a0Raghvendra S. Chauhan, J. dismissed petitioner\u2019s writ petition praying for direction to include his wife\u2019s\u00a0name at the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216851,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/15\/jhar-hc-unexplained-deviation-from-a-transfer-policy-and-prescribed-procedure-renders-the-transfer-invalid-and-arbitrary\/","url_meta":{"origin":201416,"position":5},"title":"Jhar HC | Unexplained deviation from a transfer policy and prescribed procedure renders the transfer invalid and arbitrary","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Ananda Sen, J. allowed the writ petition of the petitioner and quashed his transfer order. The petitioner was working on the post of District Supply Officer, Ranchi in the year 2016. He was transferred to the post of Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Ranchi on 20-08-2016. He joined\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201416\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/172684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}