{"id":201394,"date":"2018-09-06T12:28:43","date_gmt":"2018-09-06T06:58:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=201394"},"modified":"2018-09-10T12:37:34","modified_gmt":"2018-09-10T07:07:34","slug":"convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/","title":{"rendered":"Convict under Section 302 IPC acquitted in light of \u2018serious gaping holes\u2019 in the prosecution story, no immediate provocation to cause murder"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi and I.S. Mehta, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment and order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant was convicted for murder of his co-brother (<em>sadoo<\/em>). It was alleged that <em>firstly<\/em>, the deceased was last seen with the appellant. <em>Secondly<\/em>, the knife used in the commission of crime was recovered on disclosure made by the appellant. <em>Thirdly<\/em>, the appellant went missing after the death of the deceased and his mobile phone was also switched off. <em>Fourthly<\/em>, police claimed to recover clothes of the accused with involvement of an independent witness. <em>Lastly<\/em>, the motive behind the commission of murder was said to be that the appellant was suspicious of an illicit relationship between his wife and the deceased. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302, against which the appellant had filed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court perused the record and considered the submissions made by the parties. The Court was of the view that there were <em>serious gaping holes <\/em>in the prosecution story. The matter was dealt in a point-wise manner. <em>Firstly<\/em>, the last seen theory was unacceptable because the there was a time gap of over five hours between last seen and the death of the deceased. Moreover, undigested food was found in the intestines of the deceased in the post-mortem report; there was no record as to when, where and with whom the deceased had his last meal. <em>Secondly<\/em>, the blood on the knife which was recovered from the bushes did not match with the blood group of the deceased. <em>Thirdly<\/em>, the fact that the appellant went missing and switching off his mobile phone was the only fact that raised suspicion of his involvement in the crime. <em>Fourthly<\/em>, the independent witness involved in recovery of the clothes allegedly of the appellant did not support the recovery during his examination and turned hostile. <em>Lastly<\/em>, as to the motive for murder, the Court observed that in Indian culture, the relationship between a sister-in-law and brother-in-law is known to evoke playful and fun-filled conversations. Even the appellant would have been aware of the fact. Even if he did not appreciate such interactions between his wife and the deceased, there was no <em>immediate provocation<\/em> prior to the murder to trigger such an act. In light of the above, the Court held that the appellant deserved the <em>benefit of doubt<\/em>. Accordingly, the appeal was allowed, the judgment impugned was set aside and the appellant was acquitted of the charges against him. [Dinesh Dass v. State (NCT of Delhi),<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ZK3qe7Jr\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Del 10970<\/b><\/a>, dated 29-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi and I.S. Mehta, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[26894,2948,30765],"class_list":["post-201394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-benefit-of-doubt","tag-murder","tag-section-302-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Convict under Section 302 IPC acquitted in light of \u2018serious gaping holes\u2019 in the prosecution story, no immediate provocation to cause murder | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Convict under Section 302 IPC acquitted in light of \u2018serious gaping holes\u2019 in the prosecution story, no immediate provocation to cause murder\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi and I.S. Mehta, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-06T06:58:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-10T07:07:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/\",\"name\":\"Convict under Section 302 IPC acquitted in light of \u2018serious gaping holes\u2019 in the prosecution story, no immediate provocation to cause murder | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-06T06:58:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-10T07:07:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Convict under Section 302 IPC acquitted in light of \u2018serious gaping holes\u2019 in the prosecution story, no immediate provocation to cause murder\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Convict under Section 302 IPC acquitted in light of \u2018serious gaping holes\u2019 in the prosecution story, no immediate provocation to cause murder | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Convict under Section 302 IPC acquitted in light of \u2018serious gaping holes\u2019 in the prosecution story, no immediate provocation to cause murder","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi and I.S. Mehta, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-06T06:58:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-10T07:07:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/","name":"Convict under Section 302 IPC acquitted in light of \u2018serious gaping holes\u2019 in the prosecution story, no immediate provocation to cause murder | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-09-06T06:58:43+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-10T07:07:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/convict-under-section-302-ipc-acquitted-in-light-of-serious-gaping-holes-in-the-prosecution-story-no-immediate-provocation-to-cause-murder\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Convict under Section 302 IPC acquitted in light of \u2018serious gaping holes\u2019 in the prosecution story, no immediate provocation to cause murder"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/20\/accused-convicted-under-section-302-ipc-in-light-of-no-alternative-theory\/","url_meta":{"origin":201394,"position":0},"title":"Accused convicted under Section 302 IPC in light of \u2018no alternative theory\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and Vinod Goel, JJ. dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was alleged to have murdered his wife. It was proved that the deceased\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/09\/culpable-homicide\/","url_meta":{"origin":201394,"position":1},"title":"Gau HC | \u201cNature of injury does not suggest that the appellant acted in cruelty\u201d; HC converts conviction for murder into culpable homicide","author":"Editor","date":"March 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: The Division Bench of Suman Shyam and Mir Alfaz Ali, JJ., heard the instant petition against the judgment and order dated 24-03-2011 rendered by Additional Sessions Judge, whereby, the appellant was convicted under Section 302 Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life. The case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":283521,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/delhi-high-court-modifies-conviction-from-section-302-to-section-304i-ipc-penal-code-legalnews-legalawareness-legalresearch\/","url_meta":{"origin":201394,"position":2},"title":"Absence of premeditation leads to Delhi High Court modifying murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder; Convict to be released","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Based on the weapon used for inflicting injuries to the deceased was a very heavy danda with nodes therein, the Trial Court has convicted the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. However, it failed to appreciate the fact that the alleged offence was not committed by pre-meditation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":199405,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/duration-of-episode-considered-while-modifying-conviction-under-302-ipc-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":201394,"position":3},"title":"Duration of episode considered while modifying conviction under Section 302\u00a0IPC: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Navin Sinha, J. delivered the judgment for the Full Court comprising of Ranjan Gogoi, R. Banumathi, JJ. and himself, wherein the appeal filed by a murder convict against his conviction was partly allowed. The appellant was convicted for murdering his neighbor. The facts were that the appellant had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/07\/conviction-under-section-302-ipc-upheld-in-light-of-direct-evidence-of-12-year-old-daughter-of-convict\/","url_meta":{"origin":201394,"position":4},"title":"Conviction under Section 302 IPC\u00a0upheld in light of direct evidence of 12 year old daughter of convict","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and V. Kameswar Rao, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was charged for murdering his wife by stabbing her with a knife. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":201890,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/18\/part-of-hostile-witness-testimony-found-trustworthy-can-be-taken-into-consideration-man-convicted-for-sons-murder-on-wifes-hostile-testimony\/","url_meta":{"origin":201394,"position":5},"title":"Part of hostile witness\u2019 testimony found trustworthy can be taken into consideration; man convicted for son\u2019s murder on wife&#8217;s hostile testimony","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of B.R. Gavai and Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was convicted for the murder of his son. On\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201394"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201394\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}