{"id":201353,"date":"2018-09-05T15:30:55","date_gmt":"2018-09-05T10:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=201353"},"modified":"2018-09-12T11:46:28","modified_gmt":"2018-09-12T06:16:28","slug":"appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/","title":{"rendered":"Appellate Authority under RTI Act not liable to any penal action; disciplinary action recommended by CIC quashed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of Rajendra Menon, CJ, and V. Kameswar Rao, J. dismissed an appeal preferred by the writ petitioner against the order of the Writ Court allowing the petition filed by the respondents against the order of Chief Information Commission.<\/p>\n

The appellant had filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The CPIO concerned refused to furnish the same while giving the appellant an opportunity to carry out inspection of the record and copies thereof. The appellant filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority prescribed under the Act. The Appellate Authority dismissed the appeal. Thereafter, the matter reached to the CIC who decided the matter in favour of the appellant and directed furnishing of certified copies while also recommending disciplinary action against the Appellate Authority. Challenging the order of CIC, a writ petition was filed by the Union of India which was allowed by the Writ Court. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant filed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n

The High Court perused Section 20 of the Act and observed that it was clear that sub-section (2) thereof makes only a CPIO liable for disciplinary action. Further, it was also observed that an Appellate Authority under Section 19(1) is classified as an officer senior in rank to the CPIO. meaning thereby that the CPIO is a different authority from the Appellate Authority. The legislative intent was only to take a disciplinary action against CPIO and not against the Appellate Authority as was evident from Section 20(2). Thus, it was held that no penal action could be taken against the Appellate Authority under RTI Act. As such the appeal was dismissed. [R.K. Jain v. Union of India,2018 SCC OnLine Del 10957<\/b><\/a>, dated 29-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Rajendra Menon, CJ, and V. Kameswar Rao, J. dismissed an appeal preferred by the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31752,6211,5061,30339,13821],"class_list":["post-201353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appellate-authority","tag-cic","tag-disciplinary-action","tag-inspection","tag-rti-act"],"yoast_head":"\nAppellate Authority under RTI Act not liable to any penal action; disciplinary action recommended by CIC quashed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Appellate Authority under RTI Act not liable to any penal action; disciplinary action recommended by CIC quashed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Rajendra Menon, CJ, and V. Kameswar Rao, J. dismissed an appeal preferred by the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-05T10:00:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-12T06:16:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/\",\"name\":\"Appellate Authority under RTI Act not liable to any penal action; disciplinary action recommended by CIC quashed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-05T10:00:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-12T06:16:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Appellate Authority under RTI Act not liable to any penal action; disciplinary action recommended by CIC quashed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Appellate Authority under RTI Act not liable to any penal action; disciplinary action recommended by CIC quashed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Appellate Authority under RTI Act not liable to any penal action; disciplinary action recommended by CIC quashed","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Rajendra Menon, CJ, and V. Kameswar Rao, J. dismissed an appeal preferred by the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-05T10:00:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-12T06:16:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/","name":"Appellate Authority under RTI Act not liable to any penal action; disciplinary action recommended by CIC quashed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-09-05T10:00:55+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-12T06:16:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/appellate-authority-under-rti-act-not-liable-to-any-penal-action-disciplinary-action-recommended-by-cic-quashed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Appellate Authority under RTI Act not liable to any penal action; disciplinary action recommended by CIC quashed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":243607,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/del-hc-to-avail-exemption-under-s-8-rti-act-public-authority-must-give-detailed-reasons-as-to-how-such-disclosure-would-affect-the-pending-investigation-court-remands-the-matter-back-to-cic\/","url_meta":{"origin":201353,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | To avail exemption under S. 8 RTI Act, public authority must give detailed reasons as to how such disclosure would affect the pending investigation; Court remands the matter back to CIC","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a petition seeking direction to quash the order of Central Information Commission, Jayant Nath, J. observed, \u201c\u2026where a public authority takes recourse to Section 8 (1) (h) of the RTI Act to withhold information, the burden is on the public authority to show that in what\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":338753,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/09\/cic-expresses-grave-displeasure-over-blatant-violations-and-mishandling-of-rti-application-by-former-cpio-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":201353,"position":1},"title":"CIC expresses grave displeasure over blatant violations and mishandling of RTI application by former CPIO","author":"Ritu","date":"January 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Information Commission condemned the lack of adherence to the RTI Act provisions and the inadequate checks and balances within the system.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CPIO","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/CPIO.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/CPIO.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/CPIO.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/CPIO.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214636,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/cic-information-sought-in-the-form-of-query-held-did-not-qualify-as-information-under-rti-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":201353,"position":2},"title":"CIC | Information sought in the form of query held did not qualify as \u2018information\u2019 under RTI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC): Information Commissioner, Suresh Chandra, partly allowed a second appeal filed before him in an issue related to non-receipt of the information raised by the appellant through his RTI application. The appellant filed an application on 25-08-2015 under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6239,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/11\/public-information-officers-and-appellate-authorities-must-mention-their-names-in-the-replies-to-rti-applications\/","url_meta":{"origin":201353,"position":3},"title":"Public Information Officers and Appellate Authorities must mention their names in the replies to RTI applications","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 11, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC): While taking note of the fact that CPIOs\u00a0failed to\u00a0mention\u00a0their\u00a0name\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0replies\u00a0to\u00a0RTI\u00a0applications, CIC reiterated that CPIOs and FAAs should\u00a0mention\u00a0their\u00a0name,\u00a0address,\u00a0telephone\u00a0and\u00a0fax\u00a0number\u00a0in\u00a0all correspondence\u00a0on\u00a0RTI\u00a0matters. CIC was hearing an appeal filed by an RTI applicant seeking\u00a0information\u00a0with\u00a0reference\u00a0to\u00a0a\u00a0Notification published\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0press,\u00a0inviting applications for\u00a0the post of House\u00a0Keeper\u00a0cum Peon. The appellant sought information regarding Government\u00a0guidelines relating to above\u00a0mentioned\u00a0notification, name and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":95301,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/29\/__trashed-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":201353,"position":4},"title":"Railway Board directed to amend Railway Rules regarding copying charges","author":"Saba","date":"December 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC):\u00a0While observing that the Copying Fee Rules of the Railway Board is not consistent with the RTI Rules, CIC has directed Railway Board to amend Railway Rules regarding copying charges to bring them in conformity with the letter and spirit of the RTI Act and Rules. Said\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/23\/cic-is-there-an-obligation-under-rti-act-for-public-authority-concerned-to-transfer-rti-application-in-case-of-subject-matter-not-being-under-its-ambit-commission-throws-light\/","url_meta":{"origin":201353,"position":5},"title":"CIC | Is there an obligation under RTI Act for public authority concerned to transfer RTI application in case of subject-matter not being under its ambit? Commission throws light","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission (CIC):\u00a0Amit Pandove (Information Commissioner) while addressing the present appeal observed the essence of Section 6(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. In the instant, RTI application information was sought pertaining to the Group-A officers who were drawing reimbursement of tuition fee for their children along with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201353"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201353\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}