{"id":201348,"date":"2018-09-05T14:30:13","date_gmt":"2018-09-05T09:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=201348"},"modified":"2018-09-19T17:16:31","modified_gmt":"2018-09-19T11:46:31","slug":"one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/","title":{"rendered":"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu\u00a0&amp; Kashmir\u00a0High\u00a0Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Janak Raj Kotwal, J., dismissed a petition filed under Section 561-A CrPC. to quash the criminal proceeding under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 120-B Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 pending before the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioners (accused) had opened office of a Finance Company under the name and style as \u201cGolden Land Development (India) Ltd,\u201d in Jammu City and in due course of their business they duped the respondent and twenty others, who had deposited money with the said Company.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The quashing was sought on the merits of the case, primarily, on the ground that petitioners and the respondents of the alleged offences have had entered into a compromise by virtue of the compromise deed after the charge sheet was filed by the Crime Branch.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The matter of concern before the court was whether one respondent could be allowed to enter into a compromise deed on behalf of twenty other respondents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court came to the conclusion that as only one person has been arrayed as the respondent, therefore, other victims cannot be said to have had entered into compromise on behalf of that respondent also nor that would have sufficed for the purpose of compounding the offences and hence the question of grant of permission to compound shall be considered only when made by all the respondents.[Vinod Mahajan v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/PZn94pw2\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 563<\/b><\/a>, order dated 04-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu\u00a0&amp; Kashmir\u00a0High\u00a0Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Janak Raj Kotwal, J., dismissed a petition filed under Section 561-A CrPC. to quash <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31751,31750,30517,29714],"class_list":["post-201348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compound","tag-compromise-deed","tag-criminal-proceeding","tag-quash"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu\u00a0&amp; Kashmir\u00a0High\u00a0Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Janak Raj Kotwal, J., dismissed a petition filed under Section 561-A CrPC. to quash\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-05T09:00:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-19T11:46:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/05\\\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/05\\\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\\\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-05T09:00:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-19T11:46:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/05\\\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":251,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Compound\",\"Compromise Deed\",\"Criminal proceeding\",\"quash\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/05\\\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/05\\\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/05\\\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\\\/\",\"name\":\"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\\\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-05T09:00:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-19T11:46:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/05\\\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/05\\\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/05\\\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\\\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents","og_description":"Jammu\u00a0&amp; Kashmir\u00a0High\u00a0Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Janak Raj Kotwal, J., dismissed a petition filed under Section 561-A CrPC. to quash","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-05T09:00:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-19T11:46:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents","datePublished":"2018-09-05T09:00:13+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-19T11:46:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/"},"wordCount":251,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Compound","Compromise Deed","Criminal proceeding","quash"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/","name":"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-09-05T09:00:13+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-19T11:46:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/05\/one-respondent-cannot-be-allowed-to-contemplate-compounding-compromise-on-behalf-of-the-other-respondents\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"One respondent cannot be allowed to contemplate compounding\/ compromise on behalf of the other respondents"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201348"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201348\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}