{"id":201278,"date":"2018-09-03T18:00:03","date_gmt":"2018-09-03T12:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=201278"},"modified":"2018-09-14T16:11:57","modified_gmt":"2018-09-14T10:41:57","slug":"no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>Petitioner had filed this petition before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., against the order of respondents where petitioner\u2019s representation with regard to his transfer was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case are that petitioner was working on the post of Patwari and was also the President of the District Unit of the &#8220;Patwari Association&#8221;. Petitioner was transferred in response of which he filed representation to cancel the transfer on the ground that his wife was seriously ill and he himself was suffering from 40 percent of physical disability. Since no action was taken, a writ petition was filed and respondents were directed to reply to representation made by petitioner thereafter the representation was rejected and his services were transferred. Again petitioner submitted representation against the above transfer of services where again the representation was not responded to and petitioner had to file a writ before this court whereby respondents were ordered to respond to representation of the petitioner. Respondents rejected his representation once more and aggrieved by the same petitioner had filed this instant petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner opposed the rejection of his representation on two grounds. First, that respondents should have taken a lenient approach by considering his disability and ill health of his wife. Second, that petitioner is immune from transfer as he was the Office Bearer of recognized Association. Court while responding to the first ground stated by petitioner, observed that humanitarian considerations for employees posting cannot outweigh administrative exigency in the posting. Court also observed that it cannot interfere unless the transfer order suffers from malafide exercise of powers. While referring to <em><strong>Sanjeet Hardaha v. Sachin Jain<\/strong>, W.A. No.50 of 2018, <strong>Ramesh Kumar Soni Vs. State of MP<\/strong>, W.P. 12231 of 2017 and <strong>Prashant Shrivastava v. State of M.P.<\/strong>, W.A. No.912 of 2018 <\/em>it was stated that petitioner failed to show any malafide or violation of statutory rules in passing the impugned order. Therefore, the writ petition was dismissed. [Jagendra Pipri v. State of M.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ITg2973E\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine MP 499<\/b><\/a>, dated 29-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: Petitioner had filed this petition before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., against the order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":172684,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31278,29439,31729],"class_list":["post-201278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-malafide","tag-statutory-rules","tag-transfer-order"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Petitioner had filed this petition before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., against the order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-03T12:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-14T10:41:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/\",\"name\":\"No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-03T12:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-14T10:41:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Petitioner had filed this petition before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., against the order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-03T12:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-14T10:41:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/","name":"No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","datePublished":"2018-09-03T12:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-14T10:41:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-malafide-or-violation-of-statutory-rules-found-in-transfer-order-of-petitioner-petition-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No malafide or violation of statutory rules found in transfer order of petitioner, petition dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":201416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/06\/order-of-transfer-set-aside-as-respondent-failed-to-provide-a-speaking-order-mp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":201278,"position":0},"title":"Order of transfer set aside as respondent failed to provide a speaking order: MP HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vandana Kasrekar, J., addressed an issue where petitioner was transferred and aggrieved by the same filed this writ petition. Facts of the case are that petitioner at the time of filing this writ petition was a Dy. Manager in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216853,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/15\/raj-hc-an-employee-cannot-be-transferred-in-the-last-year-of-his-service-if-the-department-does-not-have-an-obvious-cause-for-the-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":201278,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | An employee cannot be transferred in the last year of his service, if the department does not have an obvious cause for the same","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Alok Sharma, J. allowed a civil writ petition filed by a person against his transfer order. As a result of which, another order was passed regarding its transfer, quashing the previous transfer order. \u00a0In the instant case, the petitioner was transferred to the post of RTO Alwar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":261358,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/09\/couples-have-to-make-their-choice-at-the-threshold-between-career-prospects-and-family-life-hp-hc-observes-in-a-case-where-a-mother-seeks-job-transfer-to-be-with-her-daughter\/","url_meta":{"origin":201278,"position":2},"title":"Couples have to make their choice at the threshold between career prospects and family life; HP HC observes in a case where a mother seeks job transfer to be with her daughter","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Satyen Vaidya, JJ. dismissed the petition being devoid merits. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner was appointed as Staff Nurse at IGMC Shimla, however, prior to joining the respondents Department, marriage of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213439,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/11\/raj-hc-authorities-directed-to-consider-application-for-transfer-on-working-couple-ground\/","url_meta":{"origin":201278,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC | Authorities directed to consider application for transfer on \u2018working couple ground\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Arun Bhansali, J., allowed a petition filed for transfer on \u2018working couple ground\u2019. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the inter-zonal transfer of petitioner on the basis of the \u2018working couple ground\u2019 as per\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/13\/jk-hc-lack-of-medical-facilities-for-ailing-petitioner-consideration-for-allowing-transfer\/","url_meta":{"origin":201278,"position":4},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Lack of medical facilities for ailing petitioner: Consideration for allowing transfer","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Ali Mohammad Magrey, J., allowed the writ petition filed seeking a direction to the respondents to transfer the petitioner from District Kupwara to District Srinagar on health grounds. The petitioner claimed to be working as a teacher and was posted at Upper\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238705,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/06\/p-court-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":201278,"position":5},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Transfer is an incidence of service and would be open to interference by court only is it is established that transfer order was malafide; Court rules\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: While adjudicating a petition for quashing of a transfer order, Jaishree Thakur, J., dismissed the same being devoid of any merit. The instant petition of certiorari has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioner has pleaded for quashing of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201278\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/172684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}