{"id":201165,"date":"2018-09-03T09:22:31","date_gmt":"2018-09-03T03:52:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=201165"},"modified":"2018-09-03T09:34:21","modified_gmt":"2018-09-03T04:04:21","slug":"no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/","title":{"rendered":"No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): <\/strong>A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed seeking reduction in penalty imposed on the defaulting company and its Directors.<\/p>\n

The penalty was imposed on the company and its Directors for defaulting in filing the annual return in time which attracted punishment under Section 92(5) of the Companies Act, 2013. Also, for violation of Section 137 as financial statements adopted in the annual general meeting was not filed with Registrar of Companies, punishment under Section 137(3) was attracted. The Registrar of Companies had proposed a penalty of Rs 10,64,000 on the company and Rs 10 lakhs on each of the Directors. On appellants\u2019 (three Directors of the company) application under Section 441 for compounding of offences, the NCLT\u00a0 reduced the amount of penalty to Rs 3 lakhs both for the company as well as each of the three Directors. The instant appeal was filed against this decision of NCLT for further reduction in penalty\/compounding of the offences.<\/p>\n

The Appellate Tribunal noted the submission made by the appellants the company and the Directors were not in a position to pay Rs 3 lakhs as their financial condition was not sound. In view of such submission, the Appellate Tribunal asked the Company Secretary concerned to file the statement of accounts of the Directors to support such a plea. However, the appellants did not want to disclose the respective amount available in their accounts. In such circumstances, it could not be believed that the appellants were not in a position to pay the amount or that they were bankrupt. This apart, as the NCLT had already reduced the amount of the penalty proposed by the Registrar of Companies which was just and fair, the Appellate Tribunal was not inclined to interfere in the order impugned. The appeal was dismissed holding it to be sans merit. [S.D. Bio-Tech Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies, Company Appeal (AT) No. 35 of 2018, dated 30-01-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[31714,25174,31715,31713],"class_list":["post-201165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-companies-act-2013","tag-defaulting-company","tag-financial-condition","tag-reduction-in-penalities"],"yoast_head":"\nNo reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-09-03T03:52:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-03T04:04:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/\",\"name\":\"No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-09-03T03:52:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-03T04:04:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial)","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-09-03T03:52:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-03T04:04:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/","name":"No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2018-09-03T03:52:31+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-03T04:04:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/no-reduction-in-fine-imposed-under-section-925-of-companies-act-as-directors-not-disclosing-their-accounts-nclat\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No reduction in fine imposed under Section 92(5) of Companies Act as Directors not disclosing their accounts: NCLAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":212332,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/21\/nclat-company-and-its-directors-to-be-treated-equally-while-imposing-fine-for-delay-in-filing-cost-audit-report\/","url_meta":{"origin":201165,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT | Company and its directors to be treated equally while imposing fine for delay in filing Cost Audit Report","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial) held that the company and the directors have to be treated equally while imposing fine for delay in filing Cost Audit Report. The appeal was filed against the order of National Company Law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262177,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/22\/if-a-case-was-filed-under-ibc-can-penalty-be-imposed-under-companies-act-nclat-addresses\/","url_meta":{"origin":201165,"position":1},"title":"If a case was filed under IBC, can penalty be imposed under Companies Act? NCLAT addresses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Dr Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) held that if the Intervention Application was filed under the IBC, then, any penalty to be imposed should have been under the provisions of IBC and not Companies Act.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239110,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/16\/companies-amendment-act-2020-a-step-in-the-right-direction\/","url_meta":{"origin":201165,"position":2},"title":"Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020: A step in the right direction?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ananya Raghavendra\u2020and Eshvar Girish\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/compines-act.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/compines-act.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/compines-act.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/compines-act.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/compines-act.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/17\/i-insolvency-resolution-process-cannot-be-defeated-by-taking-resort-to-internal-dispute-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":201165,"position":3},"title":"I&B Code overrides Companies Act; Insolvency Resolution Process cannot be defeated by taking resort to internal dispute: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed by the Corporate Debtor against the initiation of Insolvency Resolution Process. The Financial Creditor had granted a loan of Rs 1.02 crores to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/17\/reduction-of-capital-is-a-domestic-affair-of-a-particular-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":201165,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a \u2018majority decision\u2019 which prevails: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Venugopal. M, Judicial Member and Kanthi Narahari, Technical Member, held that \u2018Reduction of Capital\u2019 is a \u2018Domestic Affair\u2019 of a particular company in which, ordinary, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300539,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-upholds-imposition-of-rupees-10-lakh-compounding-fees-for-non-compliance-with-s185-of-the-companies-act-2013\/","url_meta":{"origin":201165,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT upholds NCLT’s order imposing \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees for non-compliance with Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013","author":"Ritu","date":"September 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a matter concerning advancement of \u20b9360 crore loan by Hewlett Packard Enterprise India in violation of Section185 which only permit granting of loan for repayment of the loan and not for any other reason, the NCLT imposed \u20b9 10 Lakh compounding fees.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201165\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}