{"id":200896,"date":"2018-08-30T11:00:19","date_gmt":"2018-08-30T05:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200896"},"modified":"2018-09-03T16:51:57","modified_gmt":"2018-09-03T11:21:57","slug":"it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"It is imperative on the High Court to record reasons while deciding application under Section 378(3) CrPC\u2014Reiterated: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/strong>A.M. Sapre, J. speaking for himself and Uday U. Lalit, J. allowed an appeal filed by the State of U.P. against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court whereby the\u00a0 appellant\u2019s application under Section 378(3) CrPC was rejected and the judgment of Additional Sessions Judge acquitting the accused (respondents herein) was affirmed.<\/p>\n

The respondents were prosecuted and tried for commission of offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 120-B IPC. The Additional Sessions Judge, on appreciating the evidence adduced by the prosecution, acquitted the respondents of all the charges. Aggrieved by the acquittal, the appellant filed an application for leave to appeal under Section 378(3) before the High Court which was rejected vide the order impugned. Against this order of the High Court, the appellant preferred the instant appeal.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court referred to State of Maharashtra <\/em>v. Sujay Mangesh Poyarekar<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0(2008) 9 SCC 475<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>for looking at the parameters to be kept in mind by the High Court while deciding an application for leave to appeal. The Court perused the order impugned and felt constrained to observe that the High Court grossly erred in passing the same without assigning any reason. It was a clear case of non-application of mind, held the Supreme Court. The order impugned neither sets out the facts nor the submissions of the parties nor the findings nor the reasons as to why the leave to appeal was declined. In such circumstances, the order impugned was set aside and the matter was remanded back to the High Court for deciding the application afresh. The appeal was, thus, allowed. [State of U.P. v. Anil Kumar,2018 SCC OnLine SC 1223<\/b><\/a>, dated 29-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: A.M. Sapre, J. speaking for himself and Uday U. Lalit, J. allowed an appeal filed by the State of U.P. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[31665,11801,13961,31666,30325,31664],"class_list":["post-200896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-acqutting","tag-high-court","tag-ipc","tag-non-application-of-mind","tag-reasons","tag-section-378-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nIt is imperative on the High Court to record reasons while deciding application under Section 378(3) CrPC\u2014Reiterated: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"It is imperative on the High Court to record reasons while deciding application under Section 378(3) CrPC\u2014Reiterated: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: A.M. Sapre, J. speaking for himself and Uday U. Lalit, J. allowed an appeal filed by the State of U.P.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-30T05:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-03T11:21:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/\",\"name\":\"It is imperative on the High Court to record reasons while deciding application under Section 378(3) CrPC\u2014Reiterated: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-30T05:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-03T11:21:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"It is imperative on the High Court to record reasons while deciding application under Section 378(3) CrPC\u2014Reiterated: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"It is imperative on the High Court to record reasons while deciding application under Section 378(3) CrPC\u2014Reiterated: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"It is imperative on the High Court to record reasons while deciding application under Section 378(3) CrPC\u2014Reiterated: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court: A.M. Sapre, J. speaking for himself and Uday U. Lalit, J. allowed an appeal filed by the State of U.P.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-30T05:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-03T11:21:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/","name":"It is imperative on the High Court to record reasons while deciding application under Section 378(3) CrPC\u2014Reiterated: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-08-30T05:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-03T11:21:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/it-is-imperative-on-the-high-court-to-record-reasons-while-deciding-application-under-section-3783-crpc-reiterated-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"It is imperative on the High Court to record reasons while deciding application under Section 378(3) CrPC\u2014Reiterated: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213565,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/11\/ph-hc-suspicion-however-strong-cannot-take-place-of-the-positive-proof-and-cannot-be-made-basis-of-conviction\/","url_meta":{"origin":200896,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC | Suspicion, however strong, cannot take place of the positive proof and cannot be made basis of conviction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab And Haryana High Court: The Bench of Rajiv Sharma and Kuldip Singh, JJ., dismissed the application filed under Section 378(4) CrPC against the Judgment passed by the Additional Sessions Judge acquitting the accused-respondents of the charges framed against them under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/22\/gau-hc-s-372-crpc-appeal-against-order-of-assistant-sessions-judge-lies-in-the-court-of-sessions-judge-whether-the-impugned-order-pertains-to-conviction-or-not\/","url_meta":{"origin":200896,"position":1},"title":"Gau HC | S. 372 CrPC: Appeal against order of Assistant Sessions Judge lies in the Court of Sessions Judge, whether the impugned order pertains to conviction or not","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: Rumi Kumari Phukan, J. dismissed an application seeking leave to appeal against an Assistant Sessions Judge\u2019s order of acquittal, holding that the forum for preferring such an appeal would be the Court of Sessions Judge and not the High Court.\u00a0 The petitioner (herein) in the instant case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220393,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/chh-hc-s-3781b-crpc-bars-appeal-in-hc-against-acquittal-order-passed-by-magistrate-in-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":200896,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | S.378(1)(b) CrPC bars appeal in HC against acquittal order passed by Magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence, reiterated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Goutam Chourdiya, JJ. dismissed an application filed by the State seeking leave to appeal against the order of acquittal rendered by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, as not maintainable. The application by the State sought leave to appeal against the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":323525,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/04\/sikkim-hc-clarifies-limitation-period-for-govt-application-of-condonation-for-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":200896,"position":3},"title":"Limitation period for Government Applications governed by Art. 114(a) of Limitation Act, not Section 378 CrPC; Sikkim HC clarifies","author":"Editor","date":"June 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court was of the view that both, the applicant in viewing the requirement of filing the appeal within six months as per S. 378(5) CrPC; and the respondents contending that the appeal should have been filed within sixty days as per S. 378(5), were equally incorrect.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245170,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/06\/aim-of-every-court-is-to-discover-the-truth-but-it-should-be-done-judiciously-recording-of-reasons-for-reversal-of-lower-courts-decision-vital-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":200896,"position":4},"title":"Aim of every Court is to discover the truth but it should be done judiciously; Recording of reasons for reversal of lower court’s decision vital: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Wider the power, greater is the necessity of caution while exercise of judicious discretion\u201d;","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":151004,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/22\/sessions-court-does-not-have-any-jurisdiction-to-entertain-a-victims-appeal-under-s-372-crpc-when-acquittal-is-recorded-in-a-complaint-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":200896,"position":5},"title":"Sessions Court does not have any jurisdiction to entertain a victim\u2019s appeal under S. 372 CrPC when acquittal is recorded in a complaint case","author":"Saba","date":"August 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan: The appellate court had allowed the appeal of the respondent-complainant under Sections 372 and 378 CrPC and set aside the acquittal of the appellant recorded by the trial court and convicted the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. This decision of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200896\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}