{"id":200885,"date":"2018-08-30T12:30:05","date_gmt":"2018-08-30T07:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200885"},"modified":"2018-08-30T11:27:20","modified_gmt":"2018-08-30T05:57:20","slug":"stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Eswatini High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of T.M. Mlangeni, J., granted an application for rescission of default judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This matter was with regard to an application for rescission of default judgment that was given against the applicant. The respondent submitted that the application for rescission was defective on the ground that the applicant did not mention the legal regime under which he seeks rescission. It is to be noted that such applications can be filed on one or more legal regime, either under Rule 31, Rule 42 or common law. Applicant is supposed to show good cause in his founding papers satisfying conditions attached with it as was mentioned in the case of <strong><em>Chetty v. Law Society, Transvaal<\/em><\/strong>, <strong>1985(2) SA 750<\/strong>. The issue before Court was whether there was a requirement of stating the rule or regime under which an application for rescission of judgment or order was filed. To this issue Court was of the view that there was no such legal requirement of stating the rule or regime under which the applicant is seeking rescission of judgment or order. The Court while perusing if the applicant had made <em>bona fide<\/em> defence with prospects of success observed that besides allegation of fraud, applicant contended to have paid all dues to the respondent therefore if the above is proved it will be a <em>bona fide<\/em> defence. Therefore, application for rescission was granted. [Eugene Rochat v. Fernando Julius Manjeia, (1734\/16) [2018] SZHC (184), dated 10-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eswatini High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of T.M. Mlangeni, J., granted an application for rescission of default judgment. This matter <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":200902,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[31670,3556,31671,31669],"class_list":["post-200885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-default-judgment","tag-defence","tag-legal-regime","tag-recission"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Eswatini High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of T.M. Mlangeni, J., granted an application for rescission of default judgment. This matter\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-30T07:00:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-30T07:00:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court","og_description":"Eswatini High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of T.M. Mlangeni, J., granted an application for rescission of default judgment. This matter","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-30T07:00:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/","name":"Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg","datePublished":"2018-08-30T07:00:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/stating-legal-regime-for-rescission-of-default-judgment-not-required-eswatini-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Stating legal regime for rescission of default judgment not required: Eswatini High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Swaziland-High-Court-735x400.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":263283,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/08\/ph-hc-application-for-rescission-of-contract-mandatory-to-avail-the-relief-as-s-28-specific-relief-act-1963-doesnt-confer-indefeasible-right\/","url_meta":{"origin":200885,"position":0},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Application for rescission of contract &#8216;mandatory&#8217; to avail the relief, as S. 28, Specific Relief Act, 1963 doesn&#8217;t confer indefeasible right","author":"Editor","date":"March 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0 Sudhir Mittal, J. dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioners (in this case the judgment-debtors) against the action of the Executing Court for refusing to recall the impugned order. According to the petitioners, the execution order was passed, ex parte hence, the fundamental principle\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202554,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/29\/shareholder-when-presented-as-shareholder-means-he-is-party-in-litigation-in-his-personal-capacity\/","url_meta":{"origin":200885,"position":1},"title":"Shareholder when presented as \u201cshareholder\u201d means he is party in litigation in his personal capacity","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitutional Court of South Africa: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mogoeng, CJ. Dlodlo, Goliath, Petse, AJ, Froneman, Jafta, Khampepe, Madlanga, and Theron, JJ., unanimously granted the applicants rescission in terms of the Uniform Rules of Court and granted leave to intervene to applicants in the trial. This application was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322801,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/23\/sebi-issues-master-circular-on-stock-brokers-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200885,"position":2},"title":"SEBI issues Master Circular for Stock Brokers rescinding 12 circulars","author":"Kriti","date":"May 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India issues master circular rescinding circulars to the extent they relate to Stock Brokers.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Securities and Exchange Board of India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287616,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/23\/sebi-notified-master-circular-for-portfolio-managers-legal-research-legal-update-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200885,"position":3},"title":"SEBI notifies Master Circular for Portfolio Managers rescinding 32 circulars","author":"Kriti","date":"March 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"On 20-3-2023, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (\u2018SEBI\u2019) notified Master circular for Portfolio Managers (\u2018PMs\u2019). The provisions came into force on 20-3-2023. Key Points: Applicability of certain provisions: The provisions relating to \u201cWritten down policies by Portfolio Managers\u201d and \u201cFair and equitable treatment of all clients\u201d will come\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322855,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/24\/sebi-issues-master-circular-for-research-analysts-to-enable-comprehensive-access-for-user\/","url_meta":{"origin":200885,"position":4},"title":"SEBI issues Master Circular for Research Analysts to enable comprehensive access for users","author":"Editor","date":"May 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Master Circular includes all guidelines and directions issued till 15-05-2024 for better accessibility.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Securities and Exchange Board of India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/execution-court-application-s28-specific-relief-act-recission-contract-time-extention-jurisdiction-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200885,"position":5},"title":"Whether Execution Court can decide application under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act for recission of contract\/ time extension? SC answers","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Dismissing the appeal, the Court opined that the respondents had all throughout shown their intention to pay the balance consideration for execution of the sale deed whereas the appellants appeared interested only in challenging the decree before higher Courts.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Execution Court Section 28 Specific Relief Act recission of contract","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Execution-Court-Section-28-Specific-Relief-Act-recission-of-contract.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Execution-Court-Section-28-Specific-Relief-Act-recission-of-contract.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Execution-Court-Section-28-Specific-Relief-Act-recission-of-contract.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Execution-Court-Section-28-Specific-Relief-Act-recission-of-contract.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200885"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200885\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/200902"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}