{"id":200842,"date":"2018-08-29T15:30:41","date_gmt":"2018-08-29T10:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200842"},"modified":"2018-08-29T14:30:00","modified_gmt":"2018-08-29T09:00:00","slug":"defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Defaulting party needs to satisfy the Court on grounds of default on his part; appeal against ex-parte order dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of\u00a0SriLanka:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.M.A. Gafoor, J. dismissed an appeal against the order of the district court filed under Section 754 of the Civil Procedure Code.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant filed a petition to set aside the ex-parte judgment entered against him followed with evidence regarding his absence from the court which were not only inconsistent but he also failed to prove the same consequently questioning their credibility.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court was of the view that a party who relies on Section 86 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code to vacate an ex-parte decree should establish a reasonable ground for default. Considering the decision in <strong><em>Sanicoch Group of Company<\/em> v. <em>Kala Traders (P) Ltd.<\/em><\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/lGa5E118\">2015 SCC OnLine SL SC 52<\/a>, which held that inquiry on application to set aside an ex-parte decree is not regulated by any specific provision of the CPC but such inquiries must be conducted consistent with rules of natural justice and the requirement of fairness, the court stated that the appellant cannot be relied upon as he failed to satisfy the court on the reasons for his default. [Howpe Liyanage Edmund Edirisinghe v. Ahangama Vithanage Sumanadasa, C.A. No. 1394\/99(F), order dated 01-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of\u00a0SriLanka: A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.M.A. Gafoor, J. dismissed an appeal against <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":147611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[31654,31574,2805,31655],"class_list":["post-200842","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-defaulting-party","tag-ex-parte-order","tag-natural_justice","tag-section-754-of-the-civil-procedure-code"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Defaulting party needs to satisfy the Court on grounds of default on his part; appeal against ex-parte order dismissed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Defaulting party needs to satisfy the Court on grounds of default on his part; appeal against ex-parte order dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of\u00a0SriLanka: A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.M.A. Gafoor, J. dismissed an appeal against\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-29T10:00:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/\",\"name\":\"Defaulting party needs to satisfy the Court on grounds of default on his part; appeal against ex-parte order dismissed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-29T10:00:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Defaulting party needs to satisfy the Court on grounds of default on his part; appeal against ex-parte order dismissed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Defaulting party needs to satisfy the Court on grounds of default on his part; appeal against ex-parte order dismissed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Defaulting party needs to satisfy the Court on grounds of default on his part; appeal against ex-parte order dismissed","og_description":"Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of\u00a0SriLanka: A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.M.A. Gafoor, J. dismissed an appeal against","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-29T10:00:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/","name":"Defaulting party needs to satisfy the Court on grounds of default on his part; appeal against ex-parte order dismissed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","datePublished":"2018-08-29T10:00:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/defaulting-party-needs-to-satisfy-the-court-on-grounds-of-default-on-his-part-appeal-against-ex-parte-order-dismissed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Defaulting party needs to satisfy the Court on grounds of default on his part; appeal against ex-parte order dismissed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":196040,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/ex-parte-decision-of-trial-court-without-making-any-endeavours-towards-reconciliation-under-hindu-marriage-act-1955-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":200842,"position":0},"title":"Ex parte decision of trial court without making any endeavours towards reconciliation under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 set aside","author":"Saba","date":"May 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: In a first appeal referred to the Single Judge Bench comprising of Sharad Kumar Gupta, J., the impugned judgment and decree in regard to Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was dismissed. Appellant had filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":327095,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/interim-ex-parte-order-appeal-s37-commercial-court-arbitration-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200842,"position":1},"title":"Order granting\/declining ex-parte interim measure in Commercial Arbitration Dispute is appealable under S. 37, A&amp;C Act, 1996: Karnataka HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant appeal, the Court had to consider the interplay of Sections 9 and 37 of the A&C Act; Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Rule 9 of High Court of Karnataka Arbitration (Proceedings before the Courts) Rules, 2001.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":181504,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/16\/no-ex-parte-decree-can-passed-bombay-hc-order-viii-cpc-original-side\/","url_meta":{"origin":200842,"position":2},"title":"No ex parte decree can be passed by Bombay HC under Order VIII CPC on the original side","author":"Saba","date":"January 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: In a case involving application for recall of an ex parte decree, the Court held that an ex parte decree, on the original side, passed under Order VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 stands to be null and can be passed only in a notice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348551,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/22\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-warns-against-intemperate-remarks-contemptuous-language\/","url_meta":{"origin":200842,"position":3},"title":"\u2018No justifiable cause for levelling scandalous and contemptuous allegations\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC warns against intemperate remarks, contemptuous language","author":"Editor","date":"May 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNot only has the petitioner failed to indicate how he has been victimized in the matter at hand, he has also made scandalous remarks concerning the integrity of the justice dispensation mechanism.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":317149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/15\/dhc-dismisses-bloombergs-appeal-against-adjs-order-to-take-down-article-against-zee-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":200842,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses Bloomberg\u2019s appeal against ADJ\u2019s order to take down defamatory article against Zee Entertainment","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAppellants rushed to this Court without exploring the option of filing their reply to the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (\u2018CPC\u2019) and\/or application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC for modification of the ex-parte ad-interim order.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/06\/utt-hc-ex-parte-decree-set-aside-considering-sufficient-cause-under-or-9-r-13-of-the-code-of-civil-procedure-1908-court-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":200842,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Ex-parte decree set aside considering \u201csufficient cause\u201d under Or. 9 R. 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Court allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Alok Kumar Verma, JJ., allowed an appeal which was filed challenging an order passed by Judge, Family Court whereby, the application filed by the appellant, under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for setting aside\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200842","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200842"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200842\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/147611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}