{"id":200806,"date":"2018-08-29T09:45:54","date_gmt":"2018-08-29T04:15:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200806"},"modified":"2018-08-30T15:13:41","modified_gmt":"2018-08-30T09:43:41","slug":"constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shekhar Dhawan, J., addressed a writ petition in nature of certiorari for quashing of a notification for creation of new Panchayats.<\/p>\n

Facts of the case are that the Punjab Government issued a letter seeking application for forming of new Gram Panchayats\/Gram Sabha. The petitioner had submitted that respondent passed a resolution for the same without following the provisions of Punjab Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 i.e. Sections 23 and 24. They had applied to form new Gram Panchayat without the consent of 1\/3rd<\/sup> population of the village and panchas of newly proposed Gram Panchayat. The petitioner pointed out that under Section 24 of the Act quorum was not complete. There were 10 members in the existing Gram Panchayat and only 4 members were present when the resolution was passed.<\/p>\n

High Court observed that quorum was not in accordance with Section 24 of the Act at the time of passing of the resolution. In addition to that resolution was already set aside by competent authority. On perusing the facts of the case Court noticed that the impugned notification could not have been issued after the resolution was set aside. Therefore, impugned notification was quashed. [Labh Singh v. State of Punjab,2018 SCC OnLine P&H 1222<\/b><\/a>, decided on 23-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shekhar Dhawan, J., addressed a writ petition in nature of certiorari <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30699,19471,6281,31645],"class_list":["post-200806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-certiorari","tag-constitution","tag-gram-panchayats","tag-quoram"],"yoast_head":"\nConstitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shekhar Dhawan, J., addressed a writ petition in nature of certiorari\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-29T04:15:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-30T09:43:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/\",\"name\":\"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-29T04:15:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-30T09:43:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shekhar Dhawan, J., addressed a writ petition in nature of certiorari","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-29T04:15:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-30T09:43:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/","name":"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-29T04:15:54+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-30T09:43:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":49981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/01\/stay-on-constitution-of-gram-panchayats-in-80-villages-within-industrial-township-of-yamuna-expressway-industrial-developmental-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":200806,"position":0},"title":"Stay on constitution of Gram Panchayats in 80 villages within ‘industrial township’ of Yamuna Expressway Industrial Developmental Authority","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Deciding a petition challenging the validity of the elections held to the Gram Panchayats in 80 villages included within the territorial limits of Yamuna Expressway Industrial Developmental Authority which was declared to be an 'industrial township' by the Governor of\u00a0 State of Uttar Pradesh vide notification dated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203253,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/relationship-by-itself-does-not-prove-extent-of-interest-of-candidate-in-contract-under-section-141g-of-maharashtra-panchayats-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":200806,"position":1},"title":"Relationship, by itself, does not prove extent of interest of candidate in contract under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Panchayats Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of S.B. Shukre, J. dismissed a petition filed challenging the orders of Collector, Gadchiroli and Additional Commissioner, Nagpur under Section 14(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The petitioner, a candidate for Gram Panchayat elections, was disqualified under the said section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292517,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/right-to-life-encapsulates-right-to-road-punjab-and-haryana-high-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200806,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Right to life encapsulates right to construction of road, even to a solitary villager\u2019: Punjab and Haryana High Court to Gram Panchayat","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Even if a single individual may be benefitted from the construction of revenue \u2018rasta\u2019 at the instance of the Revenue Collector, it is not sufficient and well-informed reason for the Panchayat to resist compliance with orders of the Collector.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":54461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/02\/gram-panchayat-is-the-appointing-authority-for-posts-in-inferior-panchayat-services-in-the-state-of-gujarat\/","url_meta":{"origin":200806,"position":3},"title":"Gram Panchayat is the \u2018Appointing Authority\u2019 for posts in \u2018Inferior Panchayat Services\u2019 in the State of Gujarat","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 2, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the matter where the family of a deceased Safai Kamdar appointed by a Gram Panchayat, sought family pension, the question before the Court was to decide the deceased was a member of the Panchayat Service as envisaged by Section 203 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 (the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/contestant-for-sarpanch-should-not-have-more-than-two-children-on-date-of-filing-of-nomination-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200806,"position":4},"title":"Odisha Gram Panchayats Act | Contestant for Sarpanch elections should not have more than two children on date of filing of nomination: Orissa High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court considered the question that whether the election of a contestant for the post of Sarpanch, Nakhara Gram Panchayat was void as he has more than two children?","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":200806,"position":5},"title":"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dr Ravi Ranjan and Madhuresh Prasad, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition quashed the order of Gram Kutchery holding the same to be outside the scope of its jurisdiction. Facts of the case were that the respondent filed an application before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200806"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200806\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}