{"id":200667,"date":"2018-08-27T13:00:24","date_gmt":"2018-08-27T07:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200667"},"modified":"2018-08-30T18:10:26","modified_gmt":"2018-08-30T12:40:26","slug":"recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/","title":{"rendered":"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vibhu Bhakru, J. dismissed a writ petition filed for recovering the application fee deposited with the Medical Council of India for establishment of a new medical college.<\/p>\n

The petitioner had filed an application for establishing a new medical college before the MCI for the academic year commencing from 2014. However, the MCI rejected the application. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application for refund of the application fee deposited, which application was also rejected. Aggrieved thus, the petitioner filed the instant petition for recovery of Rs 7 lakhs deposited as application fee along with interest thereon.<\/p>\n

The High Court referred to Regulation 4 of the Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999. It was apparent on reading the said regulation that the application fee was non-refundable. On this count alone, the instant petition was liable to be dismissed. However, the High Court also noted that the petition was filed after more than four years from the date when the application was rejected by the MCI. Since the petition was filed after the period of limitation (3 years), the action was barred by the limitation, there being no credible explanation for the delay. It was observed that although Limitation Act, 1963 may not strictly apply to proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, however, it is a settled law that the courts do not extend the discretionary remedy to applicants who have failed to approach the court within time. Furthermore, recourse to proceedings under the Article is not available for recovering any amount where suit for recovery of that amount would be barred by limitation. In view of the aforementioned, the Court dismissed the petition. [Dr R.N. Gupta Technical Educational Society v. Union of India,2018 SCC OnLine Del 10749<\/b><\/a>, dated 17-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vibhu Bhakru, J. dismissed a writ petition filed for recovering the application fee <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31623,13381,3716,26724,31624],"class_list":["post-200667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-application-fee","tag-medical-college","tag-Medical_Council_of_India","tag-period-of-limitation","tag-refund-of-fees"],"yoast_head":"\nRecovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vibhu Bhakru, J. dismissed a writ petition filed for recovering the application fee\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-27T07:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-30T12:40:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/27\\\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/27\\\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-27T07:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-30T12:40:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/27\\\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":311,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Application Fee\",\"medical college\",\"Medical Council of India\",\"period of limitation\",\"Refund of Fees\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/27\\\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/27\\\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/27\\\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\\\/\",\"name\":\"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-27T07:30:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-30T12:40:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/27\\\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/27\\\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/27\\\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vibhu Bhakru, J. dismissed a writ petition filed for recovering the application fee","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-27T07:30:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-30T12:40:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0","datePublished":"2018-08-27T07:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-30T12:40:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/"},"wordCount":311,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Application Fee","medical college","Medical Council of India","period of limitation","Refund of Fees"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/","name":"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-27T07:30:24+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-30T12:40:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/27\/recovery-of-amount-which-is-barred-by-limitation-not-allowed-under-article-226-application-for-refund-of-fees-against-mci-rejected\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Recovery of amount which is barred by limitation not allowed under Article 226; application for refund of fees against MCI rejected \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":196867,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/a-brochure-at-most-is-an-administrative-instruction-cannot-have-overriding-effect-over-regulations\/","url_meta":{"origin":200667,"position":0},"title":"A brochure at most is an administrative instruction, cannot have overriding effect over Regulations","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of B.R. Gavai and Bharati. H.Dangre, JJ., allowed a petition filed seeking a transfer from a medical college in Miraj to a college in Mumbai\/Thane. The petitioner was aggrieved by the rejection of her application for transfer from Government Medical College, Miraj to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":185094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/31\/national-medical-commission-replace-mci\/","url_meta":{"origin":200667,"position":1},"title":"National Medical Commission to replace MCI","author":"Saba","date":"January 31, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"The National Medical Commission Bill, 2017, which has been cleared by the Cabinet, is set to replace the existing Medical Council Act, 1956. The new body gives longer rope to medical colleges, but has a say on fees. The new Bill looks at moving to a less regulated environment in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Business News"","block_context":{"text":"Business News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/business_news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MEDICAL-COUNCIL-OF-INDIA_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MEDICAL-COUNCIL-OF-INDIA_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MEDICAL-COUNCIL-OF-INDIA_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MEDICAL-COUNCIL-OF-INDIA_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MEDICAL-COUNCIL-OF-INDIA_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244988,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/04\/permission-cannot-be-granted-to-medical-colleges-which-lack-necessary-infrastructure-and-facilities-sc-directs-jharkhand-government-to-rectify-deficiencies\/","url_meta":{"origin":200667,"position":2},"title":"\u201cPermission cannot be granted to Medical Colleges which lack necessary infrastructure and facilities\u201d; SC directs Jharkhand government to rectify deficiencies","author":"Editor","date":"March 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of L. Nageswara Rao and Krishna Murari, JJ., dismissed the instant petition for grant of permission for Medical Colleges after observing infrastructural and faculty deficiencies. The Bench remarked, \u201cIt is clear that gross deficiencies still exist in spite of the affidavits and undertakings filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282208,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/court-fee-cannot-be-refunded-after-the-suit-is-decided-on-merits\/","url_meta":{"origin":200667,"position":3},"title":"Kerala High Court | Court fee cannot be refunded after the suit decided on merits","author":"Editor","date":"January 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court observed that when the suit is dismissed on finding that it is barred by law, the court fees cannot be refunded.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":295997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/05\/order-punishing-doctor-falsification-of-record-precise-exact-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":200667,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Order punishing doctor for falsification of record must be precise and exact\u2019; Delhi High Court sets aside order by Medical Council","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFalsification of records is an extremely serious matter. It partakes of crime and is coloured by criminal intent. Where the falsification takes place in connection with treatment of a patient, especially where the patient is dead, the seriousness of the misdemeanor increases manifold.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6709,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/15\/strict-adherence-to-the-time-schedule-is-mandatory-for-application-for-approval-of-academic-courses-affiliation\/","url_meta":{"origin":200667,"position":5},"title":"Strict adherence to the time schedule is mandatory for application for approval of academic courses\/affiliation","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 15, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Dismissing a writ petition, the Delhi High Court reiterated that applications to the Medical Council of India (MCI), inter alia, for approval of new courses and increase of seats are liable to be dismissed if they are filed after the cut-off date. The High Court followed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200667\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}