{"id":200637,"date":"2018-08-26T11:00:50","date_gmt":"2018-08-26T05:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200637"},"modified":"2018-08-25T23:31:37","modified_gmt":"2018-08-25T18:01:37","slug":"owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Owner of vehicle exonerated from recovery right granted to Insurer in view of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66 of MV Act  \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sunil Gaur, J. allowed an appeal filed against the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation awarded was ordered to be recovered from the appellant &#8211; owner of the insured vehicle involved in an accident.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Brief facts of the case are that on the fateful day, one Manoj Sharma was driving his motorcycle when he was hit by a water tanker being driven in a rash and negligent manner. The said water tanker was owned by the appellant. As a result of the accident, said Manoj Sharma died. On filing of the claim petition by the claimants under Sections 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, the Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs 11,83,400 (which was subsequently increased to Rs 23,79,000 in an appeal connected with the instant appeal). The owner of the insured vehicle challenged the order on the ground that the Tribunal had erroneously granted recovery rights to the insurer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court perused the record and found that the insured vehicle was granted contract for watering of plants by the Delhi Government. The Court also referred to Section 66 of the Act. In view of the Court, since the insured vehicle was plying for the purpose of watering plants and for conservancy purpose in pursuance of the contract awarded to the owner, so, in light of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66, the requirement of obtaining permit was dispensed with. In such circumstances, the grant of recovery rights to the insurer could not be sustained. The order impugned was accordingly modified while putting full liability on the insurer to pay the compensation. The appeal was disposed of in the terms above. [Jagjeet Singh v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., MAC Appeal No. 228 of 2013, dated 20-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sunil Gaur, J. allowed an appeal filed against the order of the Motor <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2728,3302,31610,31609],"class_list":["post-200637","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compensation","tag-insurer","tag-recovery-right","tag-section-66-mv-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Owner of vehicle exonerated from recovery right granted to Insurer in view of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66 of MV Act \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Owner of vehicle exonerated from recovery right granted to Insurer in view of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66 of MV Act \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sunil Gaur, J. allowed an appeal filed against the order of the Motor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-26T05:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/\",\"name\":\"Owner of vehicle exonerated from recovery right granted to Insurer in view of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66 of MV Act \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-26T05:30:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Owner of vehicle exonerated from recovery right granted to Insurer in view of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66 of MV Act \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Owner of vehicle exonerated from recovery right granted to Insurer in view of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66 of MV Act \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Owner of vehicle exonerated from recovery right granted to Insurer in view of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66 of MV Act \u00a0","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sunil Gaur, J. allowed an appeal filed against the order of the Motor","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-26T05:30:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/","name":"Owner of vehicle exonerated from recovery right granted to Insurer in view of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66 of MV Act \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-26T05:30:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/owner-of-vehicle-exonerated-from-recovery-right-granted-to-insurer-in-view-of-sub-section-3b-of-section-66-of-mv-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Owner of vehicle exonerated from recovery right granted to Insurer in view of sub-section 3(b) of Section 66 of MV Act \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":208065,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/14\/ph-hc-appeal-against-compensation-under-mv-act-dismissed-as-insurer-fails-to-show-drivers-license-was-invalid\/","url_meta":{"origin":200637,"position":0},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Appeal against compensation under MV Act dismissed as insurer fails to show driver&#8217;s license was invalid \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This appeal was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Lisa Gill, J., by the Insurance Company challenging its liability to pay compensation to the claimants which was awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Facts of the case were that the claim petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":201123,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/01\/lrs-of-deceased-cannot-maintain-claim-under-section-166-mv-act-if-accident-occurred-on-deceaseds-own-fault-or-rash-and-negligent-driving-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":200637,"position":1},"title":"LRs of deceased cannot maintain claim under Section 166 MV Act if accident occurred on deceased\u2019s own fault or rash and negligent driving: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench of N.V. Ramana and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ. allowed an appeal filed by the appellant (insurer) against the judgment and order of Tripura High Court whereby the insurer was directed to pay compensation to the respondents (legal representatives of the deceased) as awarded by the Motor\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239099,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/12\/mv-act-kar-hc-will-the-insurance-company-be-liable-for-compensation-if-the-vehicle-was-insured-as-private-vehicle-but-plyed-on-hire-at-the-time-of-accident-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":200637,"position":2},"title":"[MV Act] Kar HC | Will the insurance company be liable for compensation if the vehicle was insured as \u2018private vehicle\u2019 but plyed on \u2018hire\u2019 at the time of accident? HC decides","author":"Editor","date":"November 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Hemant Chandangoudar J., dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned award and judgment regarding compensation. The facts of the case are such that the claimants have sustained accidental injuries on 30-03-2010 due to rash and negligent driving of the Toofan Jeep, and thereby filed claim petitions under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218133,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/utt-hc-comprehensive-policy-covers-liability-of-insurer-for-payment-of-compensation-in-cases-of-car-accidents-such-claims-are-not-barred-by-s-167-of-mv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":200637,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | \u2018Comprehensive policy\u2019 covers liability of insurer for payment of compensation in cases of car accidents; such claims are not barred by S. 167 of MV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. remanded a matter pertaining to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and directed them to decide on the matter expeditiously.\u00a0 The appeal was filed as the appellant as she was aggrieved by the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The appellant\u2019s husband, Bhupesh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220606,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/09\/pat-hc-insurance-company-granted-the-right-to-recover-half-of-compensation-amount-from-the-owner-insurer-of-the-other-vehicle-involved-in-an-accident-caused-due-to-composite-negligence\/","url_meta":{"origin":200637,"position":4},"title":"Pat HC | Insurance Company granted right to recover half of compensation amount from owner\/ insurer of other vehicle involved in an accident caused due to composite negligence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: S. Kumar, J. dismissed the appeal filed by the insurance company on the grounds that the parties were liable severally as well as jointly. Although the company had the right to recover such compensation paid from the other party involved in the accident for which insurance was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/kar-hc-insurer-directed-to-pay-compensation-awarded-to-claimants-and-thereafter-recover-it-from-owner-of-the-vehicle\/","url_meta":{"origin":200637,"position":5},"title":"Kar HC | Insurer directed to pay compensation awarded to claimants and thereafter recover it from owner of the vehicle","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: H.T. Narendra Prasad, J. while allowing the appeal in part and condoning the delay ordered that the claimant was not entitled to the interest for the delayed period of 358 days. This Miscellaneous First Appeal was filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking enhancement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200637","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200637"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200637\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200637"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200637"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}