{"id":200624,"date":"2018-08-25T15:00:38","date_gmt":"2018-08-25T09:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200624"},"modified":"2018-08-25T14:05:36","modified_gmt":"2018-08-25T08:35:36","slug":"non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-compliance of SEBI directions seriously compromise regulatory framework; leniency in penalty would defeat intent of Section 15-HB SEBI Act: SEBI"},"content":{"rendered":"

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): <\/strong>A single member bench comprising of Santosh Shukla, Chief General Manager (Adjudicating Officer) exercised his powers under Section 15-I of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with Rule 5 of the Adjudication Rules and imposed a monetary penalty under Section 15-HB upon the defaulting noticees for non-compliance of SEBI directions.<\/p>\n

The SEBI, vide its order, had issued certain directions against the noticees which include, inter alia<\/em>, that the noticees shall disgorge the unlawful gain and interest thereon as directed from the date of listing of the IPO of Jet Airways. The noticees challenged the directions before the Securities Appellate Tribunal which set aside the SEBI order. Thereafter, the Supreme Court, in an appeal preferred by the SEBI, set aside the order of the Appellate Tribunal; consequent to which, the directions issued by the SEBI became final. The noticees defaulted in complying with the directions. In Recovery Proceedings, the disgorgement amount was paid by the noticees, however, they failed to pay the interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent as directed by the SEBI.<\/p>\n

The Adjudicating Officer, considered the allegations levelled against the noticees; their reply; and the material available on record. Notice was taken of the fact that the noticees defaulted in complying with the directions even after the Supreme Court decision. In the view of the Adjudicating Officer, the noticees had completely disregarded the directions of SEBI. Therefore, it was a fit case to impose penalty upon the noticees. Exercising his powers as mentioned hereinabove, the Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of Rs 2 lakhs. It was also observed that such defaults seriously compromise the regulatory framework and a lenient view in such cases would defeat the legislative intent of Section 15-HB of the SEBI Act. [Opee Stock-Link Ltd. and Ashok K. Bagrecha, In re, Adjudication Order Reference No. EAD-2\/SS\/VS\/22\/32-33\/2018-19, Order dated\u00a0 21-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): A single member bench comprising of Santosh Shukla, Chief General Manager (Adjudicating Officer) exercised his <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[31594,31592,31595,31593,31596],"class_list":["post-200624","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-jet-airways","tag-noticees","tag-sebi-directions","tag-section-15-i-of-the-sebi-act-1992","tag-unlawful-gain"],"yoast_head":"\nNon-compliance of SEBI directions seriously compromise regulatory framework; leniency in penalty would defeat intent of Section 15-HB SEBI Act: SEBI | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Non-compliance of SEBI directions seriously compromise regulatory framework; leniency in penalty would defeat intent of Section 15-HB SEBI Act: SEBI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): A single member bench comprising of Santosh Shukla, Chief General Manager (Adjudicating Officer) exercised his\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-25T09:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/security-exchange-board-of-india.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/\",\"name\":\"Non-compliance of SEBI directions seriously compromise regulatory framework; leniency in penalty would defeat intent of Section 15-HB SEBI Act: SEBI | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-25T09:30:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Non-compliance of SEBI directions seriously compromise regulatory framework; leniency in penalty would defeat intent of Section 15-HB SEBI Act: SEBI\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Non-compliance of SEBI directions seriously compromise regulatory framework; leniency in penalty would defeat intent of Section 15-HB SEBI Act: SEBI | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Non-compliance of SEBI directions seriously compromise regulatory framework; leniency in penalty would defeat intent of Section 15-HB SEBI Act: SEBI","og_description":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): A single member bench comprising of Santosh Shukla, Chief General Manager (Adjudicating Officer) exercised his","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-25T09:30:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/security-exchange-board-of-india.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/","name":"Non-compliance of SEBI directions seriously compromise regulatory framework; leniency in penalty would defeat intent of Section 15-HB SEBI Act: SEBI | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-25T09:30:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/non-compliance-of-sebi-directions-seriously-compromise-regulatory-framework-leniency-in-penalty-would-defeat-intent-of-section-15-hb-sebi-act-sebi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Non-compliance of SEBI directions seriously compromise regulatory framework; leniency in penalty would defeat intent of Section 15-HB SEBI Act: SEBI"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":252748,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/","url_meta":{"origin":200624,"position":0},"title":"SEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter","author":"Editor","date":"August 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Ananta Barua, Whole Time Member while exercising the powers conferred under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11(4A), 11A and 11B(1), 11B(2) and Section 12A(1) of SCRA, 1956 read with Section 19 and 11(2)(j) of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Rule 5 of the SEBI (Procedure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":246716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/08\/reliance\/","url_meta":{"origin":200624,"position":1},"title":"SEBI | Reliance m\u00e9nage in trouble; Irregular shareholding, default in trading regulations | Obtruded with a \u20b9 25 crore penalty","author":"Editor","date":"April 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): K Saravanan, Adjudicating authority, imposed a penalty of Rs 2 crore on Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL), while making the noticees responsible not only on their own behalf but also on behalf of the minor noticees, being their natural guardians. The issue herein was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":252159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/03\/sebi-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":200624,"position":2},"title":"SEBI | Deliberate act of creating fictitious volumes distorting market equilibrium suffers a monetary penalty even in the absence of disproportionate gains","author":"Editor","date":"August 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Maninder Cheema, Adjudicating Officer, while affirming the violations under Regulation 3 (a), (b), (c), (d) and 4 (1) and 4(2)(a) of PFUTP Regulations, imposed a monetary penalty of \u00a0Rupees Five Lakh, under Section 15-I of SEBI Act. In the instant case, it was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239840,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/28\/sebi-holds-promotors-of-ndtv-guilty-of-insider-trading-bars-them-from-securities-market-for-two-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":200624,"position":3},"title":"SEBI holds promotors of NDTV guilty of insider trading, bars them from securities market for two years","author":"Editor","date":"November 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI): S.K. Mohanty, (Whole Time Member) has barred two promoters of NDTV, namely Mr Prannoy Roy and Mrs Radhika Roy (the Noticees) from the securities market for 2 years and directed them to disgorge illegal gains of more than Rs 16.97 crore for indulging in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269458,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/02\/sebi-fines-rs-7-crores-on-nse-and-nearly-35-crores-on-guilty-officials-and-stockbrokers-in-dark-fibre-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":200624,"position":4},"title":"SEBI fines Rs. 7 crores on NSE and nearly 35 crores on guilty officials and stockbrokers in Dark Fibre Case","author":"Editor","date":"July 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Dark Fibre\/Leased Line connectivity allowed to certain Stock Brokers, the Adjudicating Officer In the matter relating to Dark Fibre\/ Leased Line connectivity allowed to certain Stock Brokers, the Adjudicating Officer Suresh B Menon has who was CEO of NSE at the relevant time;observed some\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286237,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/04\/sebi-restrained-promoters-sadhna-enterprises-including-arshad-warsi-wife-entities-from-buying-selling-dealing-in-securities-market-violating-provisions-of-sebi-act-sebi-pfutp-regulations-for-luring-i\/","url_meta":{"origin":200624,"position":5},"title":"SEBI imposes penalty on Arshad Warsi and his wife & 29 other entities; Bars from Securities Market for practicing fraudulent & unfair trade practices","author":"Kriti","date":"March 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"On 2-3-2023, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (\u2018SEBI\u2019) restrained the promoters of Sadhna Enterprises including Arshad Warsi along with other 29 entities from buying, selling or dealing in the securities market for violating the provisions of the SEBI Act, 1992 and SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Untitled-design-3.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200624","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200624"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200624\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}