{"id":200502,"date":"2018-08-22T11:45:18","date_gmt":"2018-08-22T06:15:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200502"},"modified":"2018-08-30T13:05:09","modified_gmt":"2018-08-30T07:35:09","slug":"relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Relatives of husband acquitted of charge under Section 498-A IPC on finding allegations to be omnibus and unspecific: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/strong>The Bench comprising of S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ. allowed a criminal petition filed against the judgment of Hyderabad High Court whereby appellants\u2019 petition under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed.<\/p>\n

Respondent 2-wife filed a complaint alleging harassment by her husband and his relatives including the appellants herein. The appellants were maternal uncles of the husband. Pursuant to the said complaint, an FIR was filed under Section 498-A IPC. The appellants filed the petition before the High Court for quashing the FIR. However, the High Court, vide the judgment impugned, dismissed the petition of the appellants. Aggrieved thus, the appellants filed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court perused the charge sheet and found that the appellants were not the immediate family members of the husband. Except for the statement that they support the husband who was harassing the wife, nothing showed their involvement in the offence alleged. The Court referred to Kans Raj <\/em>v. State of Punjab<\/em><\/strong>, (2000) 5 SCC 207<\/a> and Kailash Chandra Agarwal <\/em>v. State of U.P.<\/em><\/strong>, (2014) 16 SCC 551<\/a> and observed that the relatives of the husband should not be roped in on the basis of omnibus allegations unless specific instances of their involvement in the crime are made out. On the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Court held that not even a prima facie case was made out against the appellants. Resultantly, the appeal was allowed; the judgment impugned was set aside; and criminal proceedings qua the appellants, in the matter concerned, were quashed. [K. Subba Rao v. State of Telangana, 2018 SCC OnLine SC 1080<\/b><\/a>, dated 21-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ. allowed a criminal petition filed against the judgment of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[3612,3067,31555,13021,31299],"class_list":["post-200502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-charge_sheet","tag-FIR","tag-hyderabad-high-court","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-section-498-a-ipc"],"yoast_head":"\nRelatives of husband acquitted of charge under Section 498-A IPC on finding allegations to be omnibus and unspecific: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Relatives of husband acquitted of charge under Section 498-A IPC on finding allegations to be omnibus and unspecific: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ. allowed a criminal petition filed against the judgment of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-22T06:15:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-30T07:35:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Relatives of husband acquitted of charge under Section 498-A IPC on finding allegations to be omnibus and unspecific: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-22T06:15:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-30T07:35:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Relatives of husband acquitted of charge under Section 498-A IPC on finding allegations to be omnibus and unspecific: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Relatives of husband acquitted of charge under Section 498-A IPC on finding allegations to be omnibus and unspecific: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Relatives of husband acquitted of charge under Section 498-A IPC on finding allegations to be omnibus and unspecific: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ. allowed a criminal petition filed against the judgment of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-22T06:15:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-30T07:35:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/","name":"Relatives of husband acquitted of charge under Section 498-A IPC on finding allegations to be omnibus and unspecific: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-08-22T06:15:18+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-30T07:35:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/22\/relatives-of-husband-acquitted-of-charge-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-finding-allegations-to-be-omnibus-and-unspecific-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Relatives of husband acquitted of charge under Section 498-A IPC on finding allegations to be omnibus and unspecific: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":205465,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/19\/power-of-hc-under-section-482-crpc-to-prevent-abuse-of-process-not-restricted-only-to-stage-of-filing-of-fir-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":200502,"position":0},"title":"Power of HC under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process not restricted only to stage of filing of FIR: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court whereby it had dismissed appellant's\u00a0writ petition seeking to quash the FIR filed against them. The case arose out of a property matter between the appellants and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283524,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/petition-filed-under-section-1563-crpc-must-satisfy-the-essential-ingredients-to-attract-alleged-offences-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":200502,"position":1},"title":"Petition filed under Section 156(3) CrPC must satisfy the essential ingredients to attract alleged offences: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that if allegations in the petition are vague and are not specific with respect to the alleged offences, it cannot lead to an order for registration of an FIR and investigation on the accusation of commission of the offences alleged.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-343.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":297899,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/misuse-section-498a-ipc-increasing-implicating-relatives-husband-jharkhand-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":200502,"position":2},"title":"Misuse of Section 498-A, IPC by implicating husband’s relatives in matrimonial disputes; Jharkhand High Court quashes criminal complaint","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Jharkhand High Court reiterated the object of Section 498-A of IPC to punish cruelty by husband and his relatives.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jharkhand high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/kar-hc-while-deciding-the-petition-under-s-482-of-crpc-evidence-cannot-be-appreciated-as-it-lies-within-the-domain-of-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":200502,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC |\u00a0 While deciding the petition under S. 482 of CrPC evidence cannot be appreciated as it lies within the domain of Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Sreenivas Harish Kumar J. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the 1st petitioner is the husband of 2nd respondent. On certain allegations that the petitioners subjected the 2nd respondent to harassment in connection with demand for dowry, FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214769,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/hp-hc-fir-in-non-compoundable-offences-pertaining-to-matrimonial-disputes-can-be-quashed-if-the-parties-have-settled-dispute-amicably\/","url_meta":{"origin":200502,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | FIR in non-compoundable offences pertaining to matrimonial disputes can be quashed if the parties have settled dispute amicably","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. allowed a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR registered for offences under Sections 498-A and 506 of the Penal Code, 1860, on the ground that parties had entered into a compromise. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/del-hc-law-regarding-quashing-of-fir-in-non-compoundable-offence-under-s-498-a-ipc-culled-out\/","url_meta":{"origin":200502,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Law regarding quashing of FIR in non-compoundable offence under S. 498-A IPC culled out","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: R.K. Gauba, J., referring to the relevant authority on the subject, allowed a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of an FIR registered under Sections 498-A and 406 read with Section 34 IPC. The parties were married to each other. The wife had lodged the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200502\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}