{"id":200453,"date":"2018-08-21T14:25:21","date_gmt":"2018-08-21T08:55:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200453"},"modified":"2018-08-22T17:15:15","modified_gmt":"2018-08-22T11:45:15","slug":"providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Providing \u2018justifiable reasons\u2019 to support grant or refusal of stay is a sine qua non: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court:<\/strong> A Bench comprising of Abhay Manohar Sapre and Uday U. Lalit, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the order of Punjab and Haryana High Court wherein the application for stay as filed by the appellants herein was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellants had filed a writ petition against the State in the High Court, and during the pendency of the same, application was filed for grant of ad-interim stay in relation to the subject matter of the land in question. By the order impugned, the High Court declined to grant the ad-interim stay. Against the said order, the appellants filed the instant appeal by way of special leave.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Supreme Court, on perusing the record of the case, observed that no adequate reason was given in the order impugned for not granting stay. The reason given did not justify the rejection, having regard to the nature of the controversy involved. In short, <em>justifiable reasons<\/em> to support either grant or rejection need to be stated, keeping in view the facts and the law applicable to the controversy involved. It was not so found in the order impugned. Resultantly, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal; set aside the order impugned, and remanded the case to the High Court to decide the matter afresh. [Birwati Chaudhary v. State of Haryana,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/HCAKjuPt\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine SC 1020<\/b><\/a>, dated 20-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of Abhay Manohar Sapre and Uday U. Lalit, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the order of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[31538,31539,2551,18381],"class_list":["post-200453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-grnat-or-refusal","tag-justifiable-reasons","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-stay"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Providing \u2018justifiable reasons\u2019 to support grant or refusal of stay is a sine qua non: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Providing \u2018justifiable reasons\u2019 to support grant or refusal of stay is a sine qua non: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of Abhay Manohar Sapre and Uday U. Lalit, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the order of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-21T08:55:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-22T11:45:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Providing \u2018justifiable reasons\u2019 to support grant or refusal of stay is a sine qua non: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-21T08:55:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-22T11:45:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Providing \u2018justifiable reasons\u2019 to support grant or refusal of stay is a sine qua non: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Providing \u2018justifiable reasons\u2019 to support grant or refusal of stay is a sine qua non: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Providing \u2018justifiable reasons\u2019 to support grant or refusal of stay is a sine qua non: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of Abhay Manohar Sapre and Uday U. Lalit, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the order of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-21T08:55:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-22T11:45:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/","name":"Providing \u2018justifiable reasons\u2019 to support grant or refusal of stay is a sine qua non: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-08-21T08:55:21+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-22T11:45:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/providing-justifiable-reasons-to-support-grant-or-refusal-of-stay-is-a-sine-qua-non-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Providing \u2018justifiable reasons\u2019 to support grant or refusal of stay is a sine qua non: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":292909,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/23\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-refuses-interim-relief-for-blenders-pride-trade-mark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200453,"position":0},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court refuses interim relief in favour of \u2018Blenders Pride\u2019 trade mark against \u2018Royal Challenger American Pride\u2019","author":"Ridhi","date":"May 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court considered the seven parameters laid in Narendra Hirawat & Co. v. Sholay Media Entertainment (P) Ltd., 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1878 for granting interim injunction including the extent of damages, protection of plaintiff's interest, balance of convenience or inconvenience, etc.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347697,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/13\/hc-cannot-dismiss-substantive-portion-of-suit-while-hearing-appeal-against-rejection-of-interim-injunction-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":200453,"position":1},"title":"High Court cannot dismiss substantive portion of suit while hearing appeal against rejection of interim injunction: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"May 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court was considering an appeal appeal against an order of the High Court dismissing the suit while considering an application for an injunction.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Dismissal of suit","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Dismissal-of-suit.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/25\/power-to-grant-interim-stay-of-bail-order-only-be-exercised-exceptional-cases-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":200453,"position":2},"title":"Power to grant interim stay of operation of bail order can only be exercised in exceptional cases: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAn order granting a stay to the operation of the order granting bail during the pendency of the application for cancellation of bail should be passed in very rare cases\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Stay of bail order","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Stay-of-bail-order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Stay-of-bail-order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Stay-of-bail-order.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Stay-of-bail-order.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291068,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/01\/supreme-court-quashes-cheating-forgery-case-against-prakash-singh-badal-sukhbir-singh-badal-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200453,"position":3},"title":"Explained| Why Supreme Court quashed forgery, cheating case against late Prakash Singh Badal and son Sukhbir","author":"Editor","date":"May 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court's decision shall not affect the pending proceedings before the High Court of Delhi against the order of the ECI as the Court did not express anything on the Constitution of the Shiromani Akali Dal","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"prakash singh badal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/prakash-singh-badal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/prakash-singh-badal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/prakash-singh-badal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/prakash-singh-badal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204105,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/23\/stay-on-court-proceedings-in-presence-of-an-arbitration-clause-can-be-granted-to-either-of-the-parties-to-arbitration-only\/","url_meta":{"origin":200453,"position":4},"title":"Stay on court proceedings in presence of an arbitration clause can be granted to either of the parties to arbitration only","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Singapore: A Single Judge Bench of Choo Han Teck, J., dismissed appeals filed against the order of the Assistant Registrar, whereby the application for stay filed by the appellants on account of an arbitration clause, was dismissed. The main issue that arose before the Court was whether\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/SupremeCourtBuilding-Singapore-20070210.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264598,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/28\/hc-spends-9-months-on-deciding-appeal-from-an-unappealable-adjournment-order-sc-imposes-rs-5-lakhs-exemplary-cost-on-litigant-for-wasting-precious-judicial-time\/","url_meta":{"origin":200453,"position":5},"title":"HC spends 9 months on deciding appeal from an &#8216;unappealable&#8217; adjournment order. SC imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs exemplary cost on litigant for wasting &#8216;precious judicial time&#8217;","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a trade mark infringement case where interlocutory injunction was sought during the pendency of the suit, the bench of L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai*, JJ, was faced with a strange situation where at first, an adjournment order of the single judge of Calcutta High Court was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/HC-spends-9-months-on-deciding-appeal-from-an-unappealable-adjournment-order.-SC-imposes-Rs.-5-Lakhs-exemplary-cost-on-litigant-for-wasting-precious-judicial-time.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/HC-spends-9-months-on-deciding-appeal-from-an-unappealable-adjournment-order.-SC-imposes-Rs.-5-Lakhs-exemplary-cost-on-litigant-for-wasting-precious-judicial-time.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/HC-spends-9-months-on-deciding-appeal-from-an-unappealable-adjournment-order.-SC-imposes-Rs.-5-Lakhs-exemplary-cost-on-litigant-for-wasting-precious-judicial-time.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/HC-spends-9-months-on-deciding-appeal-from-an-unappealable-adjournment-order.-SC-imposes-Rs.-5-Lakhs-exemplary-cost-on-litigant-for-wasting-precious-judicial-time.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/HC-spends-9-months-on-deciding-appeal-from-an-unappealable-adjournment-order.-SC-imposes-Rs.-5-Lakhs-exemplary-cost-on-litigant-for-wasting-precious-judicial-time.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200453"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200453\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}