{"id":200435,"date":"2018-08-21T09:50:22","date_gmt":"2018-08-21T04:20:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200435"},"modified":"2018-08-22T18:17:39","modified_gmt":"2018-08-22T12:47:39","slug":"an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/","title":{"rendered":"An unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed a writ petition against the order of Respondent 5. The said order directed the petitioner to vacate the government accommodation given to him, by or before 08.08.2018.<\/p>\n

The main issue, in this case, was whether Respondent 5 was justified in issuing an order for vacating the said premises without adopting the due course of law.<\/p>\n

The Court, in this case, observed that it is an accepted fact that the petitioner was an unauthorized occupant of the said government premises because he ceased to hold the official status\/position and the allottee of a Government accommodation, may it be a Government Servant, Minister or a Legislator, is required to vacate the accommodation allotted to him, after he ceases to hold the official status\/position. The Court further applied the \u2018useless formality theory\u2019 according to which if there is no possibility of change or improvement in a situation even after hearing the person against whom the order is passed, then such a formality can be avoided.<\/p>\n

The Court held that since petitioner was an unauthorized occupant of the said government accommodation for a long time now, hence he has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing the order of eviction of public premises. Concluding that the petitioner has failed to show any valid and reasonable cause to retain the Government Accommodation in question after the petitioner ceased to be Minister or Member of State Legislative Assembly, hence his petition was dismissed.[Thakur Randhir Singh v. State of J&K,2018 SCC OnLine J&K 505<\/b><\/a>, order dated 13-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed a writ petition against the order of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[4531,4621,31531,7851,31530,31532],"class_list":["post-200435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-eviction","tag-government","tag-indefeasible-right","tag-premises","tag-unauthorized-occupant","tag-vacate"],"yoast_head":"\nAn unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"An unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed a writ petition against the order of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-21T04:20:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-22T12:47:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/\",\"name\":\"An unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-21T04:20:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-22T12:47:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"An unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"An unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"An unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him","og_description":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed a writ petition against the order of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-21T04:20:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-22T12:47:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/","name":"An unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-21T04:20:22+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-22T12:47:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/an-unauthorized-occupant-of-a-government-accommodation-has-no-indefeasible-right-to-be-heard-before-issuing-an-order-of-eviction-against-him\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"An unauthorized occupant of a Government accommodation has no indefeasible right to be heard before issuing an order of eviction against him"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219641,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/public-premises-eviction-of-unauthorised-occupants-amendment-act-2019-comes-into-force\/","url_meta":{"origin":200435,"position":0},"title":"Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act, 2019 comes into force","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Smooth & Speedy Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants from Government Residential Accommodation The Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Bill, 2019 which was passed by the Parliament during the Budget Session, 2019 has come into effect from yesterday, i.e. 16-09-2019. The Gazette Notification in this regard has been issued. This\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216084,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/25\/utt-hc-refusal-to-vacate-official-accommodation-by-one-might-create-inconvenience-to-others-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":200435,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | Refusal to vacate official accommodation by one, might create inconvenience to others; petition dismissed\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Manoj K. Tiwari, J. contemplated a writ petition where it was contended that petitioner was to retire in the month of March 2020, therefore, it was not justified to ask the petitioner to vacate the official accommodation. Petitioner was earlier posted in Rudrapur, as Chief Administrative Officer,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":252680,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/13\/right-to-government-accommodation\/","url_meta":{"origin":200435,"position":2},"title":"Right to Shelter v. Right to Government Accommodation | 15 years after superannuation, a Govt. Employee still accommodated at Govt. accommodation: Does SC finds this legitimized? Explained crisply","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDisplaced persons cannot occupy government accommodation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":131671,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/17\/cabinet-approves-amendment-of-public-premises-eviction-of-unauthorized-occupants-act-1971-enabling-summary-eviction-proceedings-in-residential-accommodation\/","url_meta":{"origin":200435,"position":3},"title":"Cabinet approves amendment of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 enabling summary eviction proceedings in residential accommodation","author":"Saba","date":"May 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Union Cabinet has given its approval for amendment in Section 2 and Section 3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (PPE Act, 1971), by inserting definition of 'residential accommodation occupation' in a new clause in Section 2 of the Act and inserting provisions relating to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":381564,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/19\/2026-scc-vol-3-part-3-latest-supreme-court-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":200435,"position":4},"title":"2026 SCC Vol. 3 Part 3: Key Supreme Court Cases on Constitution, Muslim Law, Government Contracts, Elections, & more","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"April 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases in 2026 SCC Vol. 3 Part 3 on Hiba under Muslim law, Letter of Intent, no-fault liability, eviction of unauthorized occupant, and more.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2026 SCC Vol. 3 Part 3","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/2026-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-3.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/2026-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-3.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/2026-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-3.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/2026-SCC-Vol.-3-Part-3.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255546,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/13\/municipal-council-delhi-whether-owner-or-licensee-of-the-land-transferred-by-the-government-supreme-court-clarifies-nature-of-the-title\/","url_meta":{"origin":200435,"position":5},"title":"Municipal Council Delhi, whether owner or licensee of the land transferred by the Government? Supreme Court clarifies nature of the title","author":"Editor","date":"October 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c...the letters dated 21-05-2008 and 08-07-2008 are interdepartmental communication and not any policy decision or circular meant for public. Thus, such interdepartmental communications are not the enforceable orders of the Union or of the Council.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200435"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200435\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}