{"id":200281,"date":"2018-08-18T12:30:53","date_gmt":"2018-08-18T07:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200281"},"modified":"2018-08-20T11:13:45","modified_gmt":"2018-08-20T05:43:45","slug":"non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-explanation of injuries to deceased is a strong circumstance pointing towards guilt of accused"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Gauhati High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of Ajit Singh, CJ, and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. held the accused-appellant guilty under Section 304 Part II IPC as he was unable to give any explanation for the injuries suffered by the deceased.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant was accused of murdering his wife. The dead body of the wife was found in the house of the appellant; it was found that except for the appellant and his three years old daughter, there was nobody else in the house; and as such, the appellant was expected to explain under what circumstances his wife died inside the house with injuries on her head. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302. Aggrieved thus, the appellant preferred the instant appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court perused the record and referred to the Supreme Court decision in <strong><em>Ganeshlal <\/em>v. <em>State of Maharashtra<\/em><\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/10LDpI1I\">(1992) 3 SCC 106<\/a> wherein mere denial of the prosecution case coupled with absence of any explanation was held to be inconsistent with the innocence of the accused. The same principles was reiterated in <strong><em>Trimukh Maroti Kirkan <\/em>v. <em>State of Maharashtra<\/em><\/strong>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Yz6i6QpT\">(2006) 10 SCC 681<\/a>. In the instant case, the appellant, in one instance, stated that the wife died due to over-consumption of alcohol. At another, he stated that he slapped her which resulted in her death. Both the statements were found to be not true in light of the medical report that showed that the deceased suffered serious head injury. The Court held that the appellant did not offer any explanation for the injuries suffered by the deceased, and as such, the appellant was the perpetrator of the crime. However, it was found that appellant as well as deceased used to consume alcohol and quarreled with each other. The Court was of the view that the appellant dealt a blow on the head of the deceased in a fit of anger. It was held that though the appellant had no intention to kill the deceased, however, he had knowledge that such an assault might cause her death. Resultantly, the conviction of the accused was modified from that under Section 302 to Section 304 Part II. The appeal was, thus, partly allowed. [Rajesh Mahali v. State of Assam,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7VAJ92Wr\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Gau 904<\/b><\/a>, dated 09-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ajit Singh, CJ, and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. held the accused-appellant guilty under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31489,31490,30765,31488],"class_list":["post-200281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-anger","tag-guilt-of-accused","tag-section-302-ipc","tag-section-304-part-ii-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Non-explanation of injuries to deceased is a strong circumstance pointing towards guilt of accused | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Non-explanation of injuries to deceased is a strong circumstance pointing towards guilt of accused\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ajit Singh, CJ, and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. held the accused-appellant guilty under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-18T07:00:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-20T05:43:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/\",\"name\":\"Non-explanation of injuries to deceased is a strong circumstance pointing towards guilt of accused | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-18T07:00:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-20T05:43:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Non-explanation of injuries to deceased is a strong circumstance pointing towards guilt of accused\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Non-explanation of injuries to deceased is a strong circumstance pointing towards guilt of accused | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Non-explanation of injuries to deceased is a strong circumstance pointing towards guilt of accused","og_description":"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ajit Singh, CJ, and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, J. held the accused-appellant guilty under","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-18T07:00:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-20T05:43:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/","name":"Non-explanation of injuries to deceased is a strong circumstance pointing towards guilt of accused | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-18T07:00:53+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-20T05:43:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/non-explanation-of-injuries-to-deceased-is-a-strong-circumstance-pointing-towards-guilt-of-accused\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Non-explanation of injuries to deceased is a strong circumstance pointing towards guilt of accused"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":198228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/07\/false-explanation-given-by-the-accused-may-be-used-to-fortify-the-finding-of-guilt-already-recorded\/","url_meta":{"origin":200281,"position":0},"title":"False explanation given by the accused may be used to fortify the finding of guilt already recorded","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of B.R. Gavai and Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment passed by the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC. The allegation against the convict was that he had murdered his wife. On a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/21\/conviction-under-s-302-modified-to-s-3041-ipc-in-absence-of-intention-to-cause-murder\/","url_meta":{"origin":200281,"position":1},"title":"Conviction under Section 302 modified to Section 304(1) IPC in absence of intention to cause murder","author":"Saba","date":"May 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC was modified to Section 304(1) by a Division Bench comprising of Sangeet Lodha and Virendra Kumar Mathur, JJ. The appellant was accused of causing the death of his wife by setting her ablaze. It was alleged that he used\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":198007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/04\/wife-convicted-for-murder-given-benefit-of-exception-1-to-section-300-ipc-in-light-of-grave-and-sudden-provocation-by-the-husband\/","url_meta":{"origin":200281,"position":2},"title":"Wife convicted for murder given benefit of Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC in light of grave and sudden provocation by the husband","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, JJ., decided a criminal appeal wherein the conviction of the appellant-wife under Section 302 IPC for the murder of her husband was altered to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304(II). The appellant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":197621,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/28\/conviction-modified-from-section-302-to-304-ii-ipc-holding-that-the-assault-was-committed-in-a-fit-of-rage\/","url_meta":{"origin":200281,"position":3},"title":"Conviction modified from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC holding that the assault was committed in a fit of rage","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Suman Shyam and A.M. Buzor Baruah, JJ., altered the conviction and sentence of the appellant from that under Section 302 to Section 304 Part II of Penal Code, 1860. The appellant was convicted for the homicidal death of his father-in-law. It was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":199019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/25\/conviction-altered-from-section-302-to-304ii-in-absence-of-mens-rea\/","url_meta":{"origin":200281,"position":4},"title":"Conviction altered from Section 302 to 304 (II) IPC in absence of mens rea","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Deshmukh and M.G. Giratkar, J., partly allowed a criminal appeal which was filed against the judgment of conviction under Section 302 IPC passed by the trial court. The convict was accused of throwing chilli powder at the deceased and other persons\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":171534,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/01\/burden-proof-falls-upon-person-special-knowledge-fact-known\/","url_meta":{"origin":200281,"position":5},"title":"Burden of proof falls upon the person who is in special knowledge of a fact known only to him","author":"Saba","date":"December 1, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sanghi and P.S. Teji, JJ, upheld the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court under Sections 498-A and 302 while acquitting him from charges under Section 304-B IPC. The appellant had been convicted by the trial court based on circumstantial\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200281"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200281\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}