{"id":200139,"date":"2018-08-14T14:02:57","date_gmt":"2018-08-14T08:32:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200139"},"modified":"2018-08-18T17:03:33","modified_gmt":"2018-08-18T11:33:33","slug":"rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases, reiterates J&#038;K High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J., allowed a writ petition filed against the order of Respondent 3, whereby the medical claim of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that his case was not covered under Rule 6(5) of Medical Attendance Cum-Allowance Rules, 1990.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner went to Mumbai where he fell ill and was subsequently admitted to a hospital where he was diagnosed with cancer. He incurred Rs 58,468 towards medical expenses during 2004-06, however his claim was rejected by Respondent 3 on the ground that his case was not covered under Rule 6(5) of the Rules of 1990. The main issue that arose before the Court, in this case, was whether the petitioner was entitled to get medical reimbursement for the cost incurred by him for his treatment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that it was an accepted fact that the case of petitioner was genuine and that he was actually diagnosed with cancer for which he incurred a specific sum of money towards medical expenses. Taking into account another decision of the same Court, it was further observed that the rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that the respondents had declared the petitioner\u2019s treatment to be genuine and hence merely saying that the case of the petitioner did not fall within the purview of Rule 6(5) of Rules of 1990 does not disentitle the petitioner to get the amount which the petitioner has actually incurred on the medical treatment. Finally, the impugned order was quashed and the respondents were directed to disburse an amount of Rs 58,468 incurred by the petitioner for his treatment at Tata Memorial Centre Hospital, Mumbai subject to furnishing of necessary bills for the amount incurred on his treatment. [Mohd. Younis v. State,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/sh0d4zqW\"> 2018 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 498<\/a>, order dated 09-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J., allowed a writ petition filed against the order of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31436,31437,6061],"class_list":["post-200139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-medical-attendance-cum-allowance-rules-1990","tag-medical-reimbursement","tag-medical-treatment"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases, reiterates J&amp;K High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases, reiterates J&amp;K High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J., allowed a writ petition filed against the order of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-14T08:32:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-18T11:33:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases, reiterates J&K High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-14T08:32:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-18T11:33:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases, reiterates J&#038;K High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases, reiterates J&K High Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases, reiterates J&K High Court","og_description":"Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J., allowed a writ petition filed against the order of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-14T08:32:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-18T11:33:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/","name":"Rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases, reiterates J&K High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-14T08:32:57+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-18T11:33:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/14\/rules-cannot-be-interpreted-to-operate-harshly-in-medical-treatment-cases-reiterates-jk-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rules cannot be interpreted to operate harshly in medical treatment cases, reiterates J&#038;K High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":360533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/17\/karnataka-high-court-denial-of-medical-reimbursement-hospital-name-change-same-legal-entity\/","url_meta":{"origin":200139,"position":0},"title":"Change in hospital\u2019s name not a ground to deny medical reimbursement: Karnataka High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that a hospital remains the same legal entity even after a change in its name.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"denial of medical reimbursement due to hospital name change","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/denial-of-medical-reimbursement-due-to-hospital-name-change.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/denial-of-medical-reimbursement-due-to-hospital-name-change.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/denial-of-medical-reimbursement-due-to-hospital-name-change.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/denial-of-medical-reimbursement-due-to-hospital-name-change.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":303688,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/05\/crpf-terminates-personnel-on-grounds-of-mental-illness-telanganahc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200139,"position":1},"title":"Telangana High Court upholds CRPF personnel\u2019s termination on grounds of mental illness and depression","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn an organisation like CRPF, which is India\u2019s largest paramilitary Force, a member with a mental condition cannot be expected to perform his duties with utmost commitment and discipline.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351695,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/27\/himachal-pradesh-hc-medical-claims-under-beneficial-policy-not-be-denied-flimsy-grounds\/","url_meta":{"origin":200139,"position":2},"title":"Medical claims under beneficial State policy should not be denied on flimsy or irrelevant grounds: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"June 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOnce a medical reimbursement claim is admissible under a beneficial policy of the State Government, it cannot be denied or curtailed on flimsy or irrelevant grounds.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"medical claims under beneficial State policy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/medical-claims-under-beneficial-State-policy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/medical-claims-under-beneficial-State-policy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/medical-claims-under-beneficial-State-policy.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/medical-claims-under-beneficial-State-policy.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350231,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/10\/bomhc-orders-reimbursement-heart-transplant-surgery-to-former-central-govt-employee\/","url_meta":{"origin":200139,"position":3},"title":"Bombay HC orders full reimbursement for heart transplant surgery to former Central Govt. employee for expenses incurred at private hospital","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA heart transplant is a serious ailment, and its surgery is critically important, and cannot be postponed, thus, is a special circumstance. Such surgeries are expedited in the interest of human life without an embargo of an expenditure which is secondary to human life.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281373,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/10\/delhi-high-court-directs-full-reimbursement-of-medical-expenses-incurred-in-excess-applicable-rates-approved-by-central-government-medical-attendance-rules-legalnews-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":200139,"position":4},"title":"Whether excess amount liable to be recovered from the beneficiary Government employee where the actual medical expenditure is more than the approved rates? Delhi High Court rules","author":"Editor","date":"January 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice CD Singh expressed his deep dismay as to how a petition seeking reimbursement for only Rs. 51, 824\/- has been pending since 16 years, and is being vehemently contested by the GNCTD.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":310059,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/cal-hc-dismisses-petition-due-to-lack-of-relief-entitlement-under-border-security-force-act-1968-and-rules-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":200139,"position":5},"title":"Provisional selection of candidate and lack of formal enrolment exclude the applicability of Border Security Force Act, 1968; Calcutta High Court dismisses petition","author":"Ritu","date":"December 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that applicable regulations protecting enrolled persons do not apply in present matter, as the petitioner was provisionally recruited, not enrolled.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200139\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}