{"id":200027,"date":"2018-08-10T15:19:26","date_gmt":"2018-08-10T09:49:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200027"},"modified":"2018-08-18T16:54:04","modified_gmt":"2018-08-18T11:24:04","slug":"karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> A Division Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari and S. Sujatha, JJ., decided an Income Tax Appeal wherein it was held that the income tax appellate tribunal has the power to give direction for fresh enquiry into the aspects of the subject matter of appeal filed before it either suo motu or on the grounds raised by any party.<\/p>\n

The appellant-assessee company bought back it\u2019s share from it\u2019s Holding Company at an extremely high price out of the Reserve and Surplus and on the directions of Dispute Resolution Panel, the same was taxed as a dividend under Section 115-O of the IT Act, 1961. Thereafter the appellant went for appeal before the ITAT, it held that as per Section 26-A of IT Act, the buyback of shares should be taxed as Capital Gains and ordered for the re-opening of the matter by Assessing Officer who should also decide the fair market value of shares. Hence, the present appeal.<\/p>\n

The appellant-assessee submitted that the Tribunal had exceeded its jurisdiction in opening the enquiry upon questions of market price of the shares\u2019 buy-back. Whereas, the respondent submitted that the Tribunal was completely justified in re-opening the assessment and the same was well within the parameters of the subject of appeal.<\/p>\n

The Court kept away from deciding the second issue of taxability in the light of Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India<\/em><\/strong>, (2012) 6 SCC 613<\/strong><\/a>. Thereafter, it held that ITAT has the power to give directions for fresh enquiry into the aspects of the subject matter of appeal filed before it either suo motu or on any grounds raised by either party to the appeal which have not been investigated or enquired into by the lower Authorities earlier and which may result in enhancement of tax liability of the assessee. The Court added that payment by the assessee to its holding company could not be taxed as dividend. The powers of the Tribunal are not limited or circumscribed by the grounds raised before it and it has the freedom to pass any order on important matters related to appeal. The appeal was thus dismissed.[ Fidelity Business Services India (P) Ltd v. CIT, \u00a02018 SCC OnLine Kar 756<\/b>,<\/a>\u00a0 dated 23-07-2018]<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: A Division Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari and S. Sujatha, JJ., decided an Income Tax Appeal wherein it <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31394,31392,31391,31393],"class_list":["post-200027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-assessing-officer","tag-dividend","tag-power-of-itat","tag-tax-liability"],"yoast_head":"\nKarnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: A Division Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari and S. Sujatha, JJ., decided an Income Tax Appeal wherein it\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-10T09:49:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-18T11:24:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/\",\"name\":\"Karnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-10T09:49:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-18T11:24:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari and S. Sujatha, JJ., decided an Income Tax Appeal wherein it","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-10T09:49:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-18T11:24:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/","name":"Karnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-10T09:49:26+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-18T11:24:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/karnataka-hc-rules-that-the-power-of-itat-to-make-an-order-is-not-limited-to-the-grounds-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":356786,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/16\/bom-hc-loan-for-non-business-purpose-taxable-as-deemed-dividend\/","url_meta":{"origin":200027,"position":0},"title":"Advance\/Loan amount used for purposes other than business execution is taxable as deemed dividend: Bombay High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Mere maintenance of running account by the appellant with GPIL, having continuous business transactions with them or mere repayment of advance within same financial year cannot be the reasons to admit that the amount of advance is actually utilized for execution of business transaction.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"loan for non-business purpose deemed dividend","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/loan-for-non-business-purpose-deemed-dividend.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/loan-for-non-business-purpose-deemed-dividend.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/loan-for-non-business-purpose-deemed-dividend.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/loan-for-non-business-purpose-deemed-dividend.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250265,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/24\/taxation\/","url_meta":{"origin":200027,"position":1},"title":"ITAT | Whether DTAA protection in respect of taxation of dividend in source jurisdiction, can be extended to ‘dividend distribution tax’ under S. 115-O, Income Tax Act, in the hands of a domestic company? Matter referred to larger Bench","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT): A two-Member Bench of Pramod Kumar, Vice President and Amarjit Singh, Judicial Member, referred a seminal question to be decided by a larger Bench of three or more Members of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (\"ITAT\"). The two-Member Bench dubbed it as: \"[A] macro issue\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231882,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/07\/itat-bar-council-of-delhis-dominant-purpose-is-advancement-of-general-public-utility-held-entitled-for-registration-under-s-12-aa-and-consequent-exemption-under-s-80-g-income-tax-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":200027,"position":2},"title":"ITAT | Bar Council of Delhi’s dominant purpose is advancement of general public utility: Held entitled for registration under S. 12-AA and consequent exemption under S. 80-G, Income Tax Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT):\u00a0A Division Bench of R.K. Panda (Accountant Member) and Kuldip Singh (Judicial Member), while addressing a matter held, \"Bar Council of Delhi being engaged in safeguarding the rights, privileges and interest of the advocates, its dominating purpose is the advancement of general public utility within the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/16\/assessing-officer-to-record-dissatisfaction-cogent-reasons-for-correctness-claim-assessee-bombay-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":200027,"position":3},"title":"Assessing Officer to record dissatisfaction with correctness of claim of Assessee in respect of expenditure with cogent reasons: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"April 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal of Income Tax Commissioner to disallow expenditure amounting to 94 Crore u\/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/25\/itat-rejects-congress-party-tax-exemption-appeal-rs-199-15-crores\/","url_meta":{"origin":200027,"position":4},"title":"Read why ITAT rejected Congress Party\u2019s appeal for exemption of Rs 199.15 Crores due to delay in filing ITR","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"July 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The ITAT reiterated that so far as an interpretation of such an exemption provision in a fiscal statute was concerned, a stricter interpretation had to be employed rather than a liberal one.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Congress party's tax exemption appeal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Congress-partys-tax-exemption-appeal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Congress-partys-tax-exemption-appeal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Congress-partys-tax-exemption-appeal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Congress-partys-tax-exemption-appeal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258124,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/05\/explained-can-itat-recall-an-order-while-exercising-powers-under-section-2542-of-the-income-tax-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":200027,"position":5},"title":"Explained| Can ITAT recall an order while exercising powers under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of jurisdiction of ITAT, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the powers under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act are only to correct and\/or rectify the mistake apparent from the record and not beyond that. In the present\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200027"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200027\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200027"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200027"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}