{"id":200024,"date":"2018-08-10T14:09:47","date_gmt":"2018-08-10T08:39:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=200024"},"modified":"2018-08-16T12:59:04","modified_gmt":"2018-08-16T07:29:04","slug":"in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/","title":{"rendered":"In limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar, JJ. allowed a writ petition filed challenging the order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, and remanded the matter back to be heard on merits.<\/p>\n

The petitioner filed an application under Section 17(1) of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest\u00a0 Act, 2002 questioning the initiation of action by the respondent bank under Section 13(4). The petitioner had bought the land concerned, the original owner of which was one Vipin Chopra. Subsequently, the petitioner executed a registered sale deed of the said land, in the name of her husband. The respondent bank claimed that the said Vipin Chopra had mortgaged the land with State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, and the right over the same was transferred to the respondent bank. The Debt Recovery Tribunal held that the respondent bank had a right over the land and not the petitioner. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal which rejected the appeal in limine<\/em> holding that the petitioner had no locus to proceed with the matter as she was no more the owner of the land in question and her husband who was a necessary party was not impleaded. Aggrieved thus, the petitioner filed the present petition.<\/p>\n

The High Court observed that the petitioner was not properly guided and informed that her husband should have been impleaded as a party. Moreover, the petitioner being a power of attorney holder, who had executed the sale deed, had interest in contending the proceedings. She was also residing in the property. The Court felt that the petitioner and her husband should not be denied a hearing on merits on account of technical lapse and failure to understand the impact and legal effect of executing the sale deed. The petitioner was misguided and did not have benefit of proper legal advice. Accordingly, the order impugned was set aside and the matter was remanded back to the Appellate Tribunal for hearing in merits. [Devender Kaur v. Punjab and Sind Bank,2018 SCC OnLine Del 10441<\/b><\/a>, dated 02-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar, JJ. allowed a writ petition filed challenging the order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12801,31388,31389,11641,31390],"class_list":["post-200024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-debt-recovery-tribunal","tag-dismissal-of-appeal","tag-legal-advice","tag-mortgage","tag-securitization-and-reconstruction-of-financial-assets-and-enforcement-of-security-interest-act-2002"],"yoast_head":"\nIn limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar, JJ. allowed a writ petition filed challenging the order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-10T08:39:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-16T07:29:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/\",\"name\":\"In limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-10T08:39:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-16T07:29:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar, JJ. allowed a writ petition filed challenging the order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-10T08:39:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-16T07:29:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/","name":"In limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-10T08:39:47+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-16T07:29:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/in-limine-dismissal-of-appeal-reversed-as-the-appellant-was-misguided-and-did-not-have-proper-legal-advice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In limine dismissal of appeal reversed as the appellant was misguided and did not have proper legal advice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":281935,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/violation-of-sarfaesi-rules-for-property-sale-under-drt-scope-beyond-article-226-kerala-high-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":200024,"position":0},"title":"Kerala High Court |Violation of SARFAESI Rules for Sale of property is under DRT’s Scope, beyond Article 226","author":"Editor","date":"January 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court dismissed a petition seeking setting aside of sale of property conducted in violation of SARFAESI Rules, and saidthat the relief sought is within the scope of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, and not Article 226 of the Constitution of India.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":200019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/induction-of-the-assignee-in-committee-of-creditors-quashed-holding-him-to-be-a-related-party-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":200024,"position":1},"title":"Induction of the \u2018assignee\u2019 in committee of creditors quashed holding him to be a \u2018related party\u2019: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai. The directors of Fortune Pharma (P) Ltd., Corporate Debtor, had executed a\u00a0 personal guarantee\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/01\/ker-hc-court-entertains-art-226-petition-for-last-and-final-indulgence-where-alternate-remedy-under-sarfaesi-act-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":200024,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Court entertains Art. 226 petition for last and final indulgence where alternate remedy under SARFAESI Act available","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Raja Vijayaraghavan V., J., disposed of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner here is the accused in the suit filed under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner took a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215013,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/ker-hc-court-passes-orders-in-writ-petition-despite-being-jurisdictionally-proscribed-imperative-order-passed-in-the-interest-of-the-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":200024,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Court passes orders in writ petition despite being jurisdictionally proscribed; imperative order passed in the interest of the parties","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Devan Ramachandran, J. granted peremptory order for the payment of the recovery amount in installments. A writ petition was filed in order to question proceedings initiated and being pursued by the respondent Bank under the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":348987,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/28\/the-conundrum-relating-to-the-restricted-right-of-appeal-available-to-borrower-under-section-18-of-the-sarfaesi-act-2002-owing-to-mandatory-requirement-of-pre-deposit\/","url_meta":{"origin":200024,"position":4},"title":"The Conundrum Relating to the Restricted Right of Appeal Available to Borrower under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 Owing to Mandatory Requirement of Pre-Deposit","author":"Editor","date":"May 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Pallav Saxena*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Conundrum Relating","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-28T175553.787.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-28T175553.787.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-28T175553.787.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/shared-image-2025-05-28T175553.787.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264487,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/26\/national-company-law-tribunal-orders-insolvency-proceedings-against-supertech\/","url_meta":{"origin":200024,"position":5},"title":"National Company Law Tribunal orders insolvency proceedings against Supertech: Indebted and defaulted repayment of loan","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi: The Coram of P.N. Prasad, Judicial Member and Rahul Bhatnagar, Technical Member, declared insolvency proceedings against the builder Supertech Limited. An application was filed to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Supertech Limited under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200024\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}