{"id":199742,"date":"2018-08-06T09:47:04","date_gmt":"2018-08-06T04:17:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=199742"},"modified":"2018-08-30T10:11:27","modified_gmt":"2018-08-30T04:41:27","slug":"insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/","title":{"rendered":"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):<\/strong> A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial), dismissed an appeal filed by the Financial Creditor, holding it to be sans merit.<\/p>\n

The appeal was filed by the appellant Bank (Financial Creditor) against the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai whereby and whereunder the application preferred by the Operational Creditor under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the Corporate Debtor was admitted, order of moratorium was passed and name of the Interim Resolution Professional was called for. It was submitted that the Bank had taken possession of certain lands of the Corporate Debtor, and therefore, the Corporate Debtor colluded with the Operational Creditor to file the application under Section 9.<\/p>\n

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal rejected the submission of the Bank in absence of evidence. Moreover, NCLT could not have decided the issue of collusion which could only be decided by a Court of competent jurisdiction. The contentions regarding insufficiency in service of Demand Notice to the Corporate Debtor were also rejected as the Corporate Debtor itself did not raise any such objection. It was observed that as per the Supreme Court decision in Innoventive Industries Ltd. <\/em>v. ICICI Bank<\/em><\/strong>, (2018) 1 SCC 407<\/a>, if the application under Section 9 is complete and there is no existence of dispute<\/em> and there is a debt <\/em>and default<\/em>, then the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) is bound to admit the application. The Appellate Tribunal also noted that the appellant Bank had already taken steps under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Interest Act, 2002. It was held, however, that such action could not continue as I&B Code prevails over SARFAESI Act. In the result, the appeal filed by the Bank was dismissed. [Canara Bank v. Sri Chandramoulishvar Spg. Mills (P) Ltd.,2018 SCC OnLine NCLAT 389<\/b><\/a>, order dated 03-08-2018]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial), <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[25934,31305,31306],"class_list":["post-199742","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-financial-creditor","tag-sarfaesi-act-2002","tag-section-9-of-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016"],"yoast_head":"\nInsolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial),\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-06T04:17:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-30T04:41:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/\",\"name\":\"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-06T04:17:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-30T04:41:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial),","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-06T04:17:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-30T04:41:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/","name":"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2018-08-06T04:17:04+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-30T04:41:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/06\/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-prevails-over-sarfaesi-act-2002-nclat\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prevails over SARFAESI Act, 2002: NCLAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/17\/i-insolvency-resolution-process-cannot-be-defeated-by-taking-resort-to-internal-dispute-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":199742,"position":0},"title":"I&B Code overrides Companies Act; Insolvency Resolution Process cannot be defeated by taking resort to internal dispute: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed by the Corporate Debtor against the initiation of Insolvency Resolution Process. The Financial Creditor had granted a loan of Rs 1.02 crores to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/nclat-resolution-professional-has-no-jurisdiction-to-determine-the-claim-filed-by-financial-creditor-he-can-only-collate-the-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":199742,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT | Resolution Professional has no jurisdiction to “determine” the claim filed by Financial Creditor, he can only “collate” the claim","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) dismissed an appeal filed by the Resolution Professional of PRC International Hotels (P) Ltd. against the decision of the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai whereby it had accepted\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200631,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/25\/limitation-on-initiation-of-process-by-financial-creditor-to-be-counted-from-the-date-when-section-7-ib-code-came-into-force-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":199742,"position":2},"title":"Limitation on initiation of \u2018process\u2019 by financial creditor to be counted from the date when Section 7 I&B Code came into force: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal whereby the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 preferred by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200117,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/13\/directors-of-the-corporate-debtor-held-to-be-financial-creditor-against-the-same-company-in-light-of-outstanding-unsecured-debt-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":199742,"position":3},"title":"Directors of the \u2018Corporate Debtor\u2019 held to be \u2018Financial Creditor\u2019 against the same company in light of outstanding unsecured debt: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 13, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial), dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi whereby Respondents 1 and 2 were held to be Financial Creditors. Factual matrix of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226105,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/nclat-notice-issued-to-financial-creditor-for-failing-to-reach-settlement-despite-accepting-settlement-amount-filing-of-s-7-ibc-application-with-malicious-intent-to-be-considered\/","url_meta":{"origin":199742,"position":4},"title":"NCLAT | Notice issued to Financial Creditor for failing to reach settlement despite accepting settlement amount; filing of S. 7 IBC application with malicious intent to be considered","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Alok Srivastava, Member (Technical), while deciding an appeal filed against Bank of India, stated that, \u201cBank of India once accepted amount is expected to reach a settlement, failing which the question, whether application under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/induction-of-the-assignee-in-committee-of-creditors-quashed-holding-him-to-be-a-related-party-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":199742,"position":5},"title":"Induction of the \u2018assignee\u2019 in committee of creditors quashed holding him to be a \u2018related party\u2019: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai. The directors of Fortune Pharma (P) Ltd., Corporate Debtor, had executed a\u00a0 personal guarantee\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199742","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199742"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199742\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}