{"id":199617,"date":"2018-08-04T13:44:43","date_gmt":"2018-08-04T08:14:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=199617"},"modified":"2018-08-08T13:42:00","modified_gmt":"2018-08-08T08:12:00","slug":"husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/","title":{"rendered":"Husband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manish Pitale, J., acquitted the appellant-husband who was convicted by the trial court Section 498-A and other sections of IPC.<\/p>\n

The appellant was married to the deceased and within one year of marriage she set herself on fire and committed suicide. It was alleged that the appellant and other co-accused demanded Rs 20,000 from her for treatment of appellant\u2019s father. The trial court convicted the appellant but acquitted the co-accused.<\/p>\n

The High Court observed, inter alia, that there were no separate or specific allegations made against the appellant. The trial court had found that the evidence on record was not sufficient to prove that case against the co-accused persons but the same evidence, the appellant was convicted. Moreover, the said demand of Rs 20,000 for treatment of his father such as to bring it under cruelty mentioned in Section 498-A IPC. In such circumstances, the High Court was of the view that conviction of the appellant, even when the co-accused were acquitted on the same evidence, was liable to be set aside. Therefore, the appeal was allowed and the appellant was acquitted of the charges framed against him. [Balaji v. State of Maharashtra,2018 SCC OnLine Bom 1955<\/b><\/a>, dated 02-08-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manish Pitale, J., acquitted the appellant-husband who was convicted by the trial court <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3468,2570,31299,2752],"class_list":["post-199617","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conviction","tag-Cruelty","tag-section-498-a-ipc","tag-Suicide"],"yoast_head":"\nHusband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Husband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manish Pitale, J., acquitted the appellant-husband who was convicted by the trial court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-04T08:14:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-08T08:12:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/\",\"name\":\"Husband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-04T08:14:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-08T08:12:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Husband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Husband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Husband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused","og_description":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manish Pitale, J., acquitted the appellant-husband who was convicted by the trial court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-04T08:14:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-08T08:12:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/","name":"Husband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2018-08-04T08:14:43+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-08T08:12:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Husband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":224166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/13\/del-hc-conviction-under-s-498-a-does-not-automatically-render-the-accused-liable-to-be-held-guilty-under-s-306-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":199617,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Conviction under S. 498-A does not automatically render the accused liable to be held guilty under S. 306 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., set aside the order of the trial court challenged by the appellant, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 498-A\u00a0(husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty)\u00a0and Section 306\u00a0(abetment of suicide)\u00a0of the Penal Code. The wife\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211505,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/07\/del-hc-conviction-in-a-dowry-death-case-set-aside-for-being-based-on-inherently-contradictory-approach\/","url_meta":{"origin":199617,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Conviction in a dowry death case set aside for being based on ‘inherently contradictory approach’","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0While wondering why the wife committed suicide, R.K. Gauba, J., acquitted the husband who was convicted under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC. The parties were married to each-other. On basis of the evidence available on record, it could be said that the parties seemed to be living a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/tri-hc-accused-under-section-498-a-acquitted-in-light-of-improvements-in-testimony-of-related-witnesses\/","url_meta":{"origin":199617,"position":2},"title":"Tri HC | Accused under Section 498-A acquitted in light of improvements in testimony of related witnesses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court:\u00a0The Bench of S. Talapatra, J. reversed the order of the trial court convicting the appellant for offence\u00a0punishable under Section 498-A IPC and sentencing him to suffer 3 years rigorous imprisonment. Father of the deceased alleged that the appellant (husband of the deceased) tortured her and subjected\u00a0her to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6519,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/03\/11\/interpretation-of-word-sasuralwale-to-include-husband-in-case-of-dowry-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":199617,"position":3},"title":"Interpretation of word \u2018sasuralwale\u2019 to include \u2018husband\u2019 in case of dowry death","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 11, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: While holding that the word \u2018sasuralwale\u2019 includes husband and relatives of husband normally residing under same roof, a bench of T.P. Sharma J upheld the conviction of the accused husband under Section 498-A and 306 of the IPC for abetment of suicide of the deceased in a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/Dowry-Death.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/Dowry-Death.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/Dowry-Death.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/Dowry-Death.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/Dowry-Death.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224303,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/18\/bom-hc-law-does-not-permit-trial-court-to-reconstruct-a-new-theory-of-its-own-from-residual-parts-of-prosecution-evidence-to-convict-the-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":199617,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | Law does not permit trial court to reconstruct a new theory of its own from residual parts of prosecution evidence to convict the accused\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: K.K. Sonawane, J., allowed an appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for committing the offence of cruelty to women punishable under Section 498-A IPC and for abetment of suicide punishable under Section 306 IPC.\u00a0 The appellant was the sister-in-law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221472,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/25\/del-hc-offensive-conduct-under-s-498-a-ipc-of-a-nature-so-as-to-drive-woman-to-commit-suicide-not-necessarily-to-be-in-connection-with-demand-of-dowry\/","url_meta":{"origin":199617,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Offensive conduct under S. 498-A IPC of a nature so as to drive woman to commit suicide not necessarily to be in connection with demand of dowry","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bhakru, J. dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for offences\u00a0punishable under Sections 498-A\u00a0(husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty)\u00a0and 306\u00a0(abetment of suicide)\u00a0of the Penal Code. H.S. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant, submitted that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199617"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199617\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}