{"id":199516,"date":"2018-08-02T17:23:53","date_gmt":"2018-08-02T11:53:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=199516"},"modified":"2018-08-16T18:21:19","modified_gmt":"2018-08-16T12:51:19","slug":"omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/","title":{"rendered":"Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)<\/strong>: The Bench comprising of R.K. Agarwal, J., M. Shreesha, Member, dismissed the revision petition filed against the order of Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent had purchased an insurance policy from Oriental Insurance Company which was valid till 28-12-2015, however, the respondent had requested for renewal of the said policy and subsequently, the petitioner-bank had deducted a sum of Rs. 4,726\/- from respondent\u2019s account for preparing a draft in favour of the insurance company. The draft was not submitted to the insurance company and hence the policy expired. Thereafter, petitioner\u2019s wife met with an accident and the petitioner had to spend Rs. 3,50,000\/- for his wife\u2019s treatment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Commission, in this case, observed that the fact about the existence of the demand draft was not contested by the petitioner-bank, neither it was denied that they had deducted Rs. 4,726\/- from respondent\u2019s account. Had the draft been deposited in time, the policy would have been renewed and the expenses incurred by petitioner would have been covered by the policy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Commission held that since the petitioner-bank had deducted the amount and also prepared the draft but did not give it to the insurance company, this amounted to deficiency in services on the part of the petitioner bank. The Commission upheld the order of the state commission, directing petitioner to pay Rs. 3,10,000\/- to the respondent as compensation on account of deficiency of services. [Oriental Bank of Commerce v. Rajesh Kumar,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/12550Fwl\">2018 SCC OnLine NCDRC 307<\/a>, order dated 30-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The Bench comprising of R.K. Agarwal, J., M. Shreesha, Member, dismissed the revision petition filed against <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":199533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[3090,31266,31265],"class_list":["post-199516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-bank","tag-haryana-state-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission","tag-insurance-policy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The Bench comprising of R.K. Agarwal, J., M. Shreesha, Member, dismissed the revision petition filed against\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-02T11:53:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-16T12:51:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/\",\"name\":\"Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-02T11:53:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-16T12:51:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019","og_description":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The Bench comprising of R.K. Agarwal, J., M. Shreesha, Member, dismissed the revision petition filed against","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-08-02T11:53:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-16T12:51:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/","name":"Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","datePublished":"2018-08-02T11:53:53+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-16T12:51:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/omission-on-part-of-bank-resulting-in-lapse-of-insurance-policy-amounts-to-deficiency-in-services\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Omission on part of bank resulting in lapse of insurance policy amounts to \u2018deficiency in services\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":308060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/30\/insurance-policy-issued-after-inspection-objections-misrepresentation-non-disclosure-cannot-raised-structure-in-fire-ncdrc\/","url_meta":{"origin":199516,"position":0},"title":"Policy issued after inspection, objections of misrepresentation or non-disclosure cannot be raised after structure was gutted in fire: NCDRC","author":"Ridhi","date":"November 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCDRC concluded that the Insurance Company failed to establish any misrepresentation or non-disclosure of material facts while obtaining the insurance policy.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national consumer disputes redressal commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336894,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/09\/ncdrc-remands-consumer-case-theft-scdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":199516,"position":1},"title":"NCDRC remands consumer case regarding theft to Madhya Pradesh SCDRC to be decided on merits","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCDRC noted that Reliance General Insurance did not take the issue of territorial jurisdiction before SCDRC; therefore, SCDRC basing its decision on the same, was bad in law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/27\/andhra-pradesh-insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":199516,"position":2},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court| Insurer not a necessary or proper party in medical negligence consumer complaints; impleadment rejected","author":"Arunima","date":"October 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner, along with other doctors from Yashoda Hospitals, was arrayed as an opposite party before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Guntur. The complainant alleged medical negligence and deficiency in service during treatment at the hospital.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"insurer not necessary party in medical negligence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/insurer-not-necessary-party-in-medical-negligence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321158,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/01\/repudiation-life-insurance-claim-by-aviva-insurance-upeld-ncdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":199516,"position":3},"title":"NCDRC upholds repudiation of claim by Aviva Life Insurance due to violation of ubberima fidei principle by the insured","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The wife of the Deceased Life Assured had filed claims as the nominee of her husband\u2019s life insurance policies. However, the claim was rejected as the DLA failed to disclose material facts while availing the policies, thereby violating the principle of ubberima fidei (utmost good faith)","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":176884,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/19\/ncdrc-complaint-liable-dismissed-filed-beyond-period-limitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":199516,"position":4},"title":"NCDRC: Complaint liable to be dismissed, if filed beyond the period of limitation","author":"Saba","date":"December 19, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission:\u00a0 The Commission held that if a complaint is filed beyond a period of two years from when the cause of action has happened the same will not be entertained, unless there are sufficient reasons for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The Consumer Forum\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/02\/bom-hc-consumer-not-penalised-insurer-cheque-negligence\/","url_meta":{"origin":199516,"position":5},"title":"Consumer cannot be penalised for insurer&#8217;s operational negligence with premium cheque: Bombay High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe dishonour was not due to insufficiency of funds but due to technical problems in the aftermath of the floods.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consumer insurer cheque negligence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/consumer-insurer-cheque-negligence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199516","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199516"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199516\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}