{"id":199225,"date":"2018-07-30T15:04:03","date_gmt":"2018-07-30T09:34:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=199225"},"modified":"2018-08-02T12:30:07","modified_gmt":"2018-08-02T07:00:07","slug":"section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 exempts the Post office to pay damages for delay in delivery"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Chhattisgarh High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay K. Agrawal in an order stated that \u201cPost office is not liable to pay damages for delay in delivery of speed post-postal articles in light of Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case stated that, the petition dealt with the issue of whether Permanent Lok Adalat, Public Utility Services is justified in granting damages to the respondent whose speed post in regard for an application for a post at Bastar University did not reach on time and in light of the said circumstance, the respondent reached before the Permanent Lok Adalat to claim damages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The contentions of the petitioner-Union of India rejecting the claim stated that in view of Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, for the delay in transmission of the postal article, the petitioner does not stand responsible as the delay did not occur due to any kind of fraud or willful intention of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, the High Court on careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and on perusal of Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 the court made clear that Post office is run by the Government and it shall not be liable for any delay caused during the delivery of the postal articles, except the liability which may be expressed by the Central Government. Hence the Court by setting aside the order by the Permanent Lok Adalat stated that petitioner is not liable to pay any damages and respondent is only entitled to compensation equal to the composite speed post charges that have been already paid.[Post Master, Main Post Office, Jagdalpur v. Rajesh Nag, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Cyy4o089\">2018 SCC OnLine Chh 552<\/a>, order dated 19-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chhattisgarh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay K. Agrawal in an order stated that \u201cPost office is not liable <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3755,3066,31207,31208],"class_list":["post-199225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-damages","tag-delay","tag-postal-articles","tag-section-6-of-the-indian-post-office-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 exempts the Post office to pay damages for delay in delivery | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 exempts the Post office to pay damages for delay in delivery\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay K. Agrawal in an order stated that \u201cPost office is not liable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-30T09:34:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-02T07:00:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/\",\"name\":\"Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 exempts the Post office to pay damages for delay in delivery | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-30T09:34:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-02T07:00:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 exempts the Post office to pay damages for delay in delivery\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 exempts the Post office to pay damages for delay in delivery | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 exempts the Post office to pay damages for delay in delivery","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay K. Agrawal in an order stated that \u201cPost office is not liable","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-30T09:34:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-02T07:00:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/","name":"Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 exempts the Post office to pay damages for delay in delivery | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-30T09:34:03+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-02T07:00:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/section-6-of-indian-post-office-act-1898-exempts-the-post-office-to-pay-damages-for-delay-in-delivery\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898 exempts the Post office to pay damages for delay in delivery"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":92601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/order-of-state-commission-imposing-compensation-upon-postal-department-for-delay-in-delivery-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":199225,"position":0},"title":"Order of State Commission imposing compensation upon Postal Department for delay in delivery, upheld","author":"Saba","date":"December 16, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0NCDRC has upheld an order of Rajasthan State Commission vide which Rs 25,000 has been imposed upon Postal Department for delay in delivery of an application form of a man for the post of a Civil Judge which made him miss the chance. An additional\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/02\/speed-post-sender-consumer-protection-act-postal-department-liablity-deficiency-of-service-scdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":199225,"position":1},"title":"Speed post sender is a consumer under Consumer Protection Act; Postal Dept. cannot escape liability by virtue of S 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898, SCDRC reiterates","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"State Commission relying on NCDRC precedents, upheld District Consumer Commission\u2019s decision to hold the Postal Department liable for delayed delivery of a speed post by 19 days which resulted the complainant\u2019s son to miss his chance to get admission in JNU.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"postal department speed post","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/postal-department-speed-post.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/postal-department-speed-post.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/postal-department-speed-post.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/postal-department-speed-post.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214316,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/jhar-hc-responsibility-of-railways-administration-after-termination-of-transit-under-railways-act-1989-compensation-for-damage-of-goods-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":199225,"position":2},"title":"Jhar HC | Responsibility of Railways administration after termination of transit, under Railways Act, 1989: Compensation for damage of goods granted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. allowed an appeal and set aside the order passed by Tribunal for disallowing the claim petition of the said appellant against the respondent Railways. The appellant contented to the Tribunal that delivery of goods was not within the stipulated time\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235110,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/31\/cal-hc-can-a-transferee-claim-that-he-being-the-transferee-of-an-establishment-is-not-liable-to-pay-dues-accruing-before-the-transfer-under-esi-act-hc-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":199225,"position":3},"title":"Cal HC | Can a transferee claim that he being the transferee of an establishment is not liable to pay dues accruing before the transfer under ESI Act? HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Ravi Krishan Kapur, J., while addressing an issue pertaining to Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, observed that, The ESI Act provides for certain benefits to employees in case of sickness, maternity and employment injury and makes provisions for certain other matters in relation thereto. A perusal of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233820,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/12\/chh-hc-in-a-matrimonial-dispute-cause-of-action-can-arise-several-times-even-if-the-dispute-is-settled-and-case-has-been-withdrawn\/","url_meta":{"origin":199225,"position":4},"title":"Chh HC | In a matrimonial dispute, cause of action can arise several times, even if the dispute is settled and case has been withdrawn","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J., while addressing a petition made an observation with regard to matrimonial disputes that, \"...in a matrimonial dispute, the cause of action can arise again and again, even if the dispute is settled and compromised before the court and the case has been withdrawn.\"\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":287356,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/20\/legal-service-authority-act-lok-adalat-have-no-adjudicatory-power-can-only-pass-award-based-on-compromise-between-parties-rajasthan-high-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":199225,"position":5},"title":"Rajasthan High Court | Lok Adalat have no adjudicatory power and can only pass award based on compromise between parties","author":"Editor","date":"March 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Rajasthan High Court perused the entire scheme under Chapter VI of the 1987 Act and stated that the Lok Adalat had no adjudicatory power and by allowing the prayer of the PP to withdraw prosecution, it had exercised adjudicatory jurisdiction which was not vested in it.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}