{"id":198930,"date":"2018-07-24T10:09:18","date_gmt":"2018-07-24T04:39:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=198930"},"modified":"2018-07-25T17:44:12","modified_gmt":"2018-07-25T12:14:12","slug":"gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/","title":{"rendered":"Gorkha Regiment personnel declined protection under Section 197(2) CrPC as acts done were not in discharge of official duty"},"content":{"rendered":"

Meghalaya High Court: <\/strong>Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ. sitting in a criminal petition seeking to quash a case against the petitioners (army men), declined to provide the protection under Section 197(2) CrPC.<\/p>\n

It was alleged against the petitioners (accused persons) that one of them, Sep Kamal Gurung, took up a fight with traffic police constables while they were doing their duty. The said petitioner was drunk at that time. He was taken to the police station to be sent for medical examination. However, in the meanwhile, the other petitioners (both Major in the army), reached the police station along with a troop of Gorkha Regiment; ordered the troop to load their sophisticated weapons; and took Kamal Gurung with them by causing criminal intimidation of death or grievous hurt. Consequently, a case was filed against them under Sections 353, 186, 323, 506(b), 225, 109\u00a0 read with Section 34 IPC. Judicial Magistrate of First Class took cognizance of the offences. In the present petition, it was submitted that the trial court was in error as cognizance was taken without previous sanction as required as required in terms of Section 197(2) CrPC.<\/p>\n

The High Court noted that the said section requires the previous sanction for taking cognizance of any alleged offence by army personnel for any act done in discharge of official duty. The Court observed that for the said protection, it was of paramount importance that the act was done in discharge of official duty. On the facts of the case, the Court held that act of the petitioners, precisely noted hereinabove, by any stretch of the imagination, could not be said to be an act done in discharge of official duty. Therefore, the protection under Section 197(2) was not available to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed. [Vikrant Sharma v. State of Meghalaya,2018 SCC OnLine Megh 89<\/a>, decided on 13-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Meghalaya High Court: Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ. sitting in a criminal petition seeking to quash a case against the petitioners (army men), <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[11941,31121,29244,31122],"class_list":["post-198930","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-crpc","tag-gorkha-regiment","tag-protection","tag-section-1972"],"yoast_head":"\nGorkha Regiment personnel declined protection under Section 197(2) CrPC as acts done were not in discharge of official duty | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gorkha Regiment personnel declined protection under Section 197(2) CrPC as acts done were not in discharge of official duty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Meghalaya High Court: Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ. sitting in a criminal petition seeking to quash a case against the petitioners (army men),\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-24T04:39:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-25T12:14:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/\",\"name\":\"Gorkha Regiment personnel declined protection under Section 197(2) CrPC as acts done were not in discharge of official duty | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-24T04:39:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-25T12:14:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gorkha Regiment personnel declined protection under Section 197(2) CrPC as acts done were not in discharge of official duty\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gorkha Regiment personnel declined protection under Section 197(2) CrPC as acts done were not in discharge of official duty | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gorkha Regiment personnel declined protection under Section 197(2) CrPC as acts done were not in discharge of official duty","og_description":"Meghalaya High Court: Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ. sitting in a criminal petition seeking to quash a case against the petitioners (army men),","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-24T04:39:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-25T12:14:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/","name":"Gorkha Regiment personnel declined protection under Section 197(2) CrPC as acts done were not in discharge of official duty | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-24T04:39:18+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-25T12:14:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/24\/gorkha-regiment-personal-declined-protection-under-section-1972-crpc-as-acts-done-were-not-in-discharge-of-official-duty\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gorkha Regiment personnel declined protection under Section 197(2) CrPC as acts done were not in discharge of official duty"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":342312,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":198930,"position":0},"title":"S. 197 CrPC | Excess use of power by Customs officers to \u2018extract truth\u2019 is an act done in discharge of official duty: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSanction of the Government, to prosecute a public officer, for any act related to the discharge of official duty, is imperative to protect the public officer from facing harassive, retaliatory, revengeful, and frivolous proceedings.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/25\/orissa-hc-quashes-criminal-proceedings-against-nesco-orissa-officials-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":198930,"position":1},"title":"Orissa HC quashes Criminal proceedings against NESCO Orissa Officials on grounds of absence of Sanction under Section 197 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"April 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The officers on duty cannot be subjected to undue harassment in the hands of unscrupulous litigants, to prevent malicious prosecution provisions such as Section 168 of the Electricity Act, 2003, are put in place.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351346,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/24\/police-officer-exceeding-official-duty-still-protected-under-section-197-crpc-patna-hc-scc-times-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":198930,"position":2},"title":"S. 197 CrPC | Police officer, allegedly exceeding official duty, is safeguarded by prior sanction if acts reasonably linked to official functions: Patna HC","author":"Editor","date":"June 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA mere excess or overreach in the performance of official duty does not, by itself, disentitle a public servant from the statutory protection mandated by law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":53721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":198930,"position":3},"title":"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The 3-judge bench of I. A. Ansari ACJ, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Navaniti Prasad Singh, JJ upheld the validity of Invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section (3) of Section 197 , the Notification dated 16.05.1980 issued by Bihar Government, invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324574,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/17\/cal-hc-reinstates-gorkha-janmukti-morcha-leader-bimal-gurung-accused-madan-tamang-murder-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":198930,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court reinstates Bimal Gurung Gorkha Janamukti Morcha Leader as accused in Madan Tamang Murder Case","author":"Arunima","date":"June 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The case relates to the murder of Madan Tamang, the then-president of the All-India Gorkha League (AIGL) in broad daylight at Darjeeling Mall on 21-05-2010.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/section-197-crpc-sanction-required-for-criminal-complaint-against-police-officer-phhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":198930,"position":5},"title":"Sanction required under Section 197 CrPC for criminal complaint against Police Officer: Punjab and Haryana HC","author":"Ridhi","date":"December 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It was contended on part of the State that since the complaint was filed by the Court itself, no sanction under Section 197 of CrPC was required.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"punjab and haryana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198930"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198930\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198930"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}