{"id":198828,"date":"2018-07-21T13:36:46","date_gmt":"2018-07-21T08:06:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=198828"},"modified":"2018-08-02T16:15:01","modified_gmt":"2018-08-02T10:45:01","slug":"section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 3(4) of National Security Act, 1980 does not allow laxity in reporting the detention to the State Government: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court: <\/strong>The Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and AM Khanwilkar and Dr DY Chandrachud JJ., allowed an appeal by setting aside the order of the Manipur High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present matter dealt with the essence of Section 3(4) of the National Security Act, 1980, specifically the meaning of \u2018forthwith\u2019 in the said provision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant challenged the order of preventive detention as the detaining authority violated the provision of Section 3(4) of the NSA, 1980. He contended that the District Magistrate had failed to report the State Government \u2018forthwith\u2019 his report of detention under the said provision of NSA, 1980, as the district magistrate reported it to the government after a lapse of 5 days.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, on careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Supreme Court found that the report to the state government was sent after 5 days for which no reason was stated causing the order to be vitiated. Supreme Court relied on the case <strong>S.K. Salim v State of West Bengal, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/vzgK0oP1\">(1975) 1 SCC 653 <\/a><\/strong>for emphasising the interpretation of laws of preventive detention along with the point that the report to be sent under Section 3(4) should not carry any laxity with it in reporting to the Government. The appeal was allowed in the present case for the above-said reasons and the order of the High Court of Manipur was dismissed. [Hetchin Haokip v. State of Manipur,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/483zs6P7\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine SC 713<\/b><\/a>, dated 20-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and AM Khanwilkar and Dr DY Chandrachud JJ., allowed an appeal by setting <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[3365,31079,30320],"class_list":["post-198828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-detention","tag-national-security-ac","tag-order"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Section 3(4) of National Security Act, 1980 does not allow laxity in reporting the detention to the State Government: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 3(4) of National Security Act, 1980 does not allow laxity in reporting the detention to the State Government: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and AM Khanwilkar and Dr DY Chandrachud JJ., allowed an appeal by setting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-21T08:06:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-02T10:45:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Section 3(4) of National Security Act, 1980 does not allow laxity in reporting the detention to the State Government: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-21T08:06:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-02T10:45:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 3(4) of National Security Act, 1980 does not allow laxity in reporting the detention to the State Government: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 3(4) of National Security Act, 1980 does not allow laxity in reporting the detention to the State Government: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 3(4) of National Security Act, 1980 does not allow laxity in reporting the detention to the State Government: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and AM Khanwilkar and Dr DY Chandrachud JJ., allowed an appeal by setting","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-21T08:06:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-02T10:45:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/","name":"Section 3(4) of National Security Act, 1980 does not allow laxity in reporting the detention to the State Government: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-07-21T08:06:46+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-02T10:45:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/21\/section-34-of-national-security-act-1980-does-not-allow-laxity-in-reporting-the-detention-to-the-state-government-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 3(4) of National Security Act, 1980 does not allow laxity in reporting the detention to the State Government: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":196646,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/02\/order-of-detention-quashed-on-grounds-of-violation-of-section-10-of-national-security-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":198828,"position":0},"title":"Order of detention quashed on grounds of violation of Section 10 of National Security Act","author":"Saba","date":"June 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Manipur High Court: A writ petition filed against the order of detention passed by the District Magistrate was allowed by the Division Bench comprising of N. Kotiswar Singh, ACJ and Kh. Nobin Singh. J. The petition was filed against the detention order passed against appellant who was a member of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256613,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/01\/national-security-act-delay-in-considering-representation-and-non-communication-of-rejection-strikes-at-the-heart-of-fundamental-rights-of-detenu-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":198828,"position":1},"title":"National Security Act| Delay in considering representation; non-communication of rejection strike at the heart of fundamental rights of detenu: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPreventive detention in independent India is to be exercised with utmost regard to constitutional safeguards.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379513,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/27\/all-hc-preventive-detention-under-nsa-public-order-law-and-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":198828,"position":2},"title":"Constitutional freedoms cannot be exercised at the cost of human lives: Allahabad HC upholds preventive detention order under NSA","author":"Editor","date":"March 27, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere potentiality of the act is to disturb the even tempo of the life of the community, it would be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Preventive detention under NSA","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Preventive-detention-under-NSA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Preventive-detention-under-NSA.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Preventive-detention-under-NSA.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Preventive-detention-under-NSA.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":360444,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/17\/madhya-pradesh-hc-denies-relief-to-man-who-opened-fire-in-public\/","url_meta":{"origin":198828,"position":3},"title":"\u201cRightly detained for his conduct\u201d: Madhya Pradesh HC denies relief to man who opened fire in public and uploaded the video on social media","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSometimes offences are grievous, and sometimes, the manner in which a person behaves (someone with criminal antecedents) also creates fear amongst people. Therefore, for maintaining public order, peace, and tranquility in the region, this is a restraining step required in the attending set of facts.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Man who Opened Fire In Public","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Man-who-Opened-Fire-In-Public.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Man-who-Opened-Fire-In-Public.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Man-who-Opened-Fire-In-Public.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Man-who-Opened-Fire-In-Public.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6487,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/23\/person-responsible-for-posting-objectionable-comments-on-social-networking-site-set-at-liberty\/","url_meta":{"origin":198828,"position":4},"title":"Person responsible for posting objectionable comments on social networking site set at liberty","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 23, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: In a yet another case related to posting of objectionable comments on the social networking site, a division bench of Prashant K. Mishra and Goutam Bhaduri JJ, set the detenu at liberty on the ground that at the first instance, District Magistrate cannot detain a person for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213482,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/10\/manipur-hc-manipur-journalist-detained-under-nsa-set-at-liberty-detention-order-found-vitiated-for-non-supplying-of-material\/","url_meta":{"origin":198828,"position":5},"title":"Manipur HC | Manipur journalist detained under NSA set at liberty; detention order found vitiated for non-supplying of material","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Manipur High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Lanusungkum Jamir and Kh. Nobin Singh, JJ., released Kishorchandra Wangkhem, the 39-year old journalist who was detained under the National Security Act, 1980 for criticising the Government through Facebook posts. At about 2 pm on 27-11-2018, Kishorchandra was picked up by some unidentified persons on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198828\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}