{"id":198767,"date":"2018-07-20T11:33:30","date_gmt":"2018-07-20T06:03:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=198767"},"modified":"2018-07-23T15:31:08","modified_gmt":"2018-07-23T10:01:08","slug":"single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/","title":{"rendered":"Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Valmiki Mehta, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC\u00a0 against the judgment of the trial court whereby appellant\u2019s suit for possession and mesne profits was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The suit was dismissed by the trial court holding that the appellant being only one of the co-owners, could not claim possession in absence of support from other co-owners. It was held that a\u00a0 single landlord could not terminate the tenancy. Aggrieved thus, the appellant preferred the instant appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court relied on <strong>Sk. Sattar Sk. Mohd. Choudhari v. Gundappa Amabadas Bukate, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FaAt7a5a\">(1996) 6 SCC 373<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0and <strong>Jagdish Dutt v. Dharam Pal, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Mk52Oe02\">(1999) 3 SCC 644<\/a><\/strong> to hold that one co-owner\/co-landlord is not entitled on his own, in the face of opposition from other co-owners\/co-landlords, to terminate the tenancy for seeking possession of the tenanted property and\/or mesne profits. In the present case, the other co-owners had infact opposed the termination of tenancy as well as the suit filed by the appellant. Observing that the appeal was completely frivolous, the High Court held that the suit was rightly dismissed by the trial court. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. [Navin Chander Anand v. Union Bank of India,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Pgf7o77i\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Del 9902<\/b><\/a>, 17-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Valmiki Mehta, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC\u00a0 against <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[21404,20111,9741,31063],"class_list":["post-198767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-mesne-profits","tag-section-96-cpc","tag-tenancy","tag-terminate"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Valmiki Mehta, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC\u00a0 against\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-20T06:03:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-23T10:01:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/\",\"name\":\"Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-20T06:03:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-23T10:01:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Valmiki Mehta, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC\u00a0 against","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-20T06:03:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-23T10:01:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/","name":"Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-20T06:03:30+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-23T10:01:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":202167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/24\/mesne-profits-under-section-212-cpc-also-include-interest-payable-thereon-some-honest-guess-work-while-calculation-acceptable\/","url_meta":{"origin":198767,"position":0},"title":"Mesne profits, under Section 2(12) CPC, also include interest payable thereon; some honest guess work while calculation acceptable","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Valmiki Mehta, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-tenant impugning the judgment of the trial court whereby mesne profits were awarded to the respondent-landlord. The appellant was a tenant in the subject premises. The tenancy commenced in 1986 and was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206856,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/","url_meta":{"origin":198767,"position":1},"title":"Landlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.M. Dhavale, J. dismissed a second appeal filed against the order made in first appeal wherein it was held that the plaintiffs were not entitled to claim damages for wrongful possession of rented premises by the defendant. The plaintiffs were owners of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325145,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/26\/mesne-profits-payable-continuation-possession-tenant-after-expiry-determination-forfeiture-termination-lease\/","url_meta":{"origin":198767,"position":2},"title":"Mesne Profits on continuation of possession payable only after \u2018expiry of lease\u2019 or even after \u2018determination, forfeiture or termination\u2019? SC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the matter at hand, the Court directed the tenant to deposit Rs.5,15,05,512\/-, considering the location of the demised premises in the heart of Kolkata, the rent, the alleged non-payment of rent, the default in payment of interest, as alleged.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Mesne Profits on continuation of possession","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Mesne-Profits-on-continuation-of-possession.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222706,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/del-hc-landlord-entitled-for-judgment-on-admissions-in-a-suit-for-ejectment-where-tenant-unequivocally-admits-the-ingredients-to-be-established-by-the-landlord\/","url_meta":{"origin":198767,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Landlord entitled for judgment on admissions in a suit for ejectment where tenant unequivocally admits the ingredients to be established by the landlord","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., allowed a petition that challenged the impugned order whereby petitioner's application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC for judgment on admissions was rejected. The petitioner (landlord) had filed a suit for possession of the suit property which was owned by her. She had prayed for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":40841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/","url_meta":{"origin":198767,"position":4},"title":"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 30, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While disposing of an appeal relating eviction of tenant on the ground of termination of tenancy the Court held that, the tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband would definitely come within the category of shared household but as long as the tenancy survives. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":313295,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/07\/cal-hc-refers-matter-to-chief-justice-for-resolution-by-third-judge-due-to-difference-of-opinion-on-question-of-fact-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":198767,"position":5},"title":"Unanimity on Questions of Law; differences on Questions of Facts: Division Bench refers matter to Calcutta High Court Chief Justice for resolution by third Judge","author":"Ritu","date":"February 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Division bench agreed to the monthly occupation charges but disagreed on the time period for payment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198767"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198767\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}