{"id":198764,"date":"2018-07-20T10:39:15","date_gmt":"2018-07-20T05:09:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=198764"},"modified":"2018-07-23T15:20:18","modified_gmt":"2018-07-23T09:50:18","slug":"court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/","title":{"rendered":"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of trial court whereby petitioner\u2019s application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC was rejected.<\/p>\n

In the abovesaid application, the petitioner had prayed to the court that a revenue expert be appointed to prepare excerpt and to report the history of the suit land as per pedigree table, as in its absence, the petitioner won\u2019t be able to prove his case. Trial court rejected the application holding that it was for the petitioner to prove his case by leading his own evidence. Aggrieved thus, the petitioner filed the instant petition.<\/p>\n

The High Court found no merit in the petition. It noted that the suit was filed somewhere in 2008; issues were framed and evidence was led. It was at that stage of hearing that the said application was filed. The Court observed that before ordering any investigation under the said rules, the court has to be satisfied that the same shall be necessary for the purpose of adjudication. Further, in the present case, the matter being a property dispute, the onus was on the petitioner to prove his case. Neither scientific investigation was required, nor the court deemed a local investigation necessary for the purpose of elucidating evidence. The Court also observed that it is not a right conferred upon a party to call upon the court to order an investigation. Accordingly, the petition was found sans merit and was dismissed. [Rajinder Singh v. Ran Singh,2018 SCC OnLine HP 889<\/b><\/a>, dated 18-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[27414,2521,31061],"class_list":["post-198764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cpc","tag-Evidence","tag-revenue-expert"],"yoast_head":"\nCourt cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-20T05:09:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-23T09:50:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-20T05:09:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-23T09:50:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":281,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"CPC\",\"Evidence\",\"revenue expert\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/\",\"name\":\"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-20T05:09:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-23T09:50:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/20\\\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-20T05:09:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-23T09:50:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected","datePublished":"2018-07-20T05:09:15+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-23T09:50:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/"},"wordCount":281,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","keywords":["CPC","Evidence","revenue expert"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/","name":"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2018-07-20T05:09:15+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-23T09:50:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":309602,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":198764,"position":0},"title":"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: Himachal Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen it is a matter of record that the petitioner had sought amendment in the suit on the ground that during the pendency of the suit, certain part of the suit land stood encroached by the respondent, this pre-supposes that the petitioner was aware of his boundaries.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"himachal pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/06\/andhra-pradesh-hc-upholds-the-order-dismissing-application-under-order-viii-rule-2-of-cpc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":198764,"position":1},"title":"Relevance of the documents sought under Order VII Rule 2 of CPC should be stated in the affidavit: Andhra Pradesh High Court upholds Order dismissing application","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not stated in the affidavit as to how the documents are relevant to the suit except stating that, the documents are important and crucial documents to prove that the promissory note suit is a rank forged and materially altered.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":317658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/18\/delhi-high-court-upholds-trial-court-order-dismissing-order7-rule11-application-due-procedural-considerations-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":198764,"position":2},"title":"Issue of limitation cannot be decided without recording of evidence, once it becomes a mixed question of law and fact: Delhi High Court upholds Trial Court\u2019s dismissal of Order 7 Rule 11","author":"Arunima","date":"March 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court held that the dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was warranted, emphasizing the need to focus solely on the allegations in the plaint at the preliminary stage because the issues regarding limitation and adverse possession required further evidence and examination, which could\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365880,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/06\/application-for-consolidation-of-suits-under-section-10-cpc-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":198764,"position":3},"title":"Application for consolidation of multiple suits is not maintainable under S. 10 CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 10 CPC relates to the principle of res subjudice wherein, a subsequent suit filed between the same parties on the same cause must be stayed in the light of the pendency of the earlier suit. It is not concerned with the issue of clubbing or consolidating the cases.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consolidation of suits under Section 10","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":155204,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/","url_meta":{"origin":198764,"position":4},"title":"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity","author":"Saba","date":"September 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court:\u00a0The petitioner aggrieved by an order of rejection of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Senior Civil Judge, Rajgarh preferred a petition. The respondent filed a suit for eviction and mesne profit against the petitioner-defendant before the Civil Judge, Rajgarh, Churu. During the pendency\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":325390,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/delhi-hc-dismisses-hershey-india-plea-for-recalling-summons-of-witnesses\/","url_meta":{"origin":198764,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Records summoned will reveal basis of dispute between parties\u2019: Delhi HC dismisses Hershey India\u2019s plea for recalling summons of witnesses","author":"Editor","date":"July 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the respondent merely seeks to summon the record, which was not in his possession but was in the possession of the petitioner, which right cannot be denied to him.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198764"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198764\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}